| Revision as of 11:52, 14 June 2009 editMariomassone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,643 edits ←Created page with 'Now see here you, have you even read my responses on the discussion page? Nothing you have written is accompanied by a verifiable reference. In fact, you have even …' | Revision as of 12:23, 14 June 2009 edit undoLeaveSleaves (talk | contribs)Rollbackers42,926 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Siberian Tiger. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Now see here you, have you even read my responses on the discussion page? Nothing you have written is accompanied by a verifiable reference. In fact, you have even modified existing text to completely contradict their own references (which are from notable, scientific sources by the way). There is a word for that: vandalism. I have already notified the administrators, and this persistant vandalism of yours is not helping you in any way.] (]) 11:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | Now see here you, have you even read my responses on the discussion page? Nothing you have written is accompanied by a verifiable reference. In fact, you have even modified existing text to completely contradict their own references (which are from notable, scientific sources by the way). There is a word for that: vandalism. I have already notified the administrators, and this persistant vandalism of yours is not helping you in any way.] (]) 11:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Siberian Tiger|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <sup>'']''</sup>''']''' 12:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:23, 14 June 2009
Now see here you, have you even read my responses on the discussion page? Nothing you have written is accompanied by a verifiable reference. In fact, you have even modified existing text to completely contradict their own references (which are from notable, scientific sources by the way). There is a word for that: vandalism. I have already notified the administrators, and this persistant vandalism of yours is not helping you in any way.Mariomassone (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Siberian Tiger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Sleaves 12:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)