Revision as of 14:47, 20 June 2009 editCuchullain (talk | contribs)Administrators83,895 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:33, 21 June 2009 edit undoCuchullain (talk | contribs)Administrators83,895 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
=="Scholars"== | =="Scholars"== | ||
You've been told again and again why your edits are not acceptable. Do not add challenged material back into the article again or you will be blocked from editing.--] ]/] 14:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | You've been told again and again why your edits are not acceptable. Do not add challenged material back into the article again or you will be blocked from editing.--] ]/] 14:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:As to your comments to various other editors, please see ]: "To avoid disrupting the consensus building process on Misplaced Pages, editors should keep the number of notifications small, keep the message text neutral, and not preselect recipients according to their established opinions." Please cease.--] ]/] 13:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:33, 21 June 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Edit warring on Aisha
Do not continue to add that challenged material back into Aisha while discussion is underway, it is highly unproductive. Because of your pattern of edit warring I have protected the page.--Cúchullain /c 13:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Gnosisquest. You have new messages at Debresser's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Aisha
Please be aware that I have been one of those advocating unprotection of Aisha. You may not be aware of it, but there has been quite some discussion about this. The bottomline is that unprotection of this article means that if problems arise, they will be settled by blocking the user who makes them. Therefore I advice you to be cautious in your edits. I say this without making any accusations whatsoever, just as a word of caution.
I have had a look at your recent edits to Aisha, and have noticed that most of them have been reverted. I personally agree with the reasons mentioned by the reverting editors in the edit-summaries. Please study those. Debresser (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks.I would like to tell you what my view is.
According to[REDACTED] newespaper citations can not be used to edit articles regarding history and I agree.I am using the newspaper article not to edit history but under the section Scholarly view.(P.S Opinion of scholars are considered of extreme importance in Islam.)
Regarding Maria al Qibtah http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=4579&CATE=1 There is a difference in opinion whether she married the Prophet or not and only the negative opinion is being highlighted in the section Story of the honey (For more info on Shaykh Abdurrahman please see http://www.whitethreadpress.com/authors/shaykh_abdurrahman.htm )
So either both opinions should be mentioned or the disputed opinion should be removed.
Please respond if you are not busy and thanks once again.--Gnosisquest (talk) 22:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Opinion of sholars
Salam
Adil Salahi teaches Islamic Studies at the Markfield Institute of Higher Education, Leicester, England. After working for the BBC Arabic Service for several years, he worked for the Arabic daily, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat. He continues to publish a column, "Islam in Perspective", in its sister publication, Arab News, an English daily published in Saudi Arabia.
He has produced an English translation of several volumes of Sayyid Qutb's commentary, In the Shade of the Quran (Leicester, Islamic Foundation), as well as several other books on Islamic subjects.
But acceptability of his views in general forums is not clear furthermore using him as source on Misplaced Pages may not be wise especially on the article where you intend to use it. I have been monitoring those set of articles for quiet some time. If you want to quote him anyway first do research on him and be prepared for tedious edit-war and talk-war.
Best of luck! Was'salam.
--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 06:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
"Scholars"
You've been told again and again why your edits are not acceptable. Do not add challenged material back into the article again or you will be blocked from editing.--Cúchullain /c 14:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- As to your comments to various other editors, please see WP:CANVASS: "To avoid disrupting the consensus building process on Misplaced Pages, editors should keep the number of notifications small, keep the message text neutral, and not preselect recipients according to their established opinions." Please cease.--Cúchullain /c 13:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)