User talk:Sesu Prime: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:37, 24 June 2009 editArtichoker (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,994 edits →Game Informer: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:52, 24 June 2009 edit undoArtichoker (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,994 edits →Game Informer: cmtNext edit →
Line 63:		Line 63:

	Hey man, I noticed you just a review by '']'' to the review table in the FR/LG article. Do you perhaps have access to the issue of the magazine? If you do, any critical reception from the review that is added to the article would be much appreciated. Cheers, ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)		Hey man, I noticed you just a review by '']'' to the review table in the FR/LG article. Do you perhaps have access to the issue of the magazine? If you do, any critical reception from the review that is added to the article would be much appreciated. Cheers, ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
			:Oh good. As for Nintendo Power, if there really are five separate scores for the game, I suppose averaging them would be the best course of action (of course you would need to note in the article that you performed that calculation.) ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:52, 24 June 2009

IT'S SPELLED "Pokémon"

NOT "Pokemon"

NOT "pokémon"

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award Sesu Prime this anti-vandalism barnstar for his stellar work in keeping all Pokémon articles free from such incessant vandalism and cruft. Keep up the good work! Artichoker 21:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello my fellow Wikipedians! Leave me a message here on my talk page and I'll get back to you on your talk. It's easy! -sesuPRIME

Archives

2009
February-June

Misplaced Pages Signpost: 15 June 2009

Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
Misplaced Pages in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost: 22 June 2009

Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Game Informer

Hey man, I noticed you just added a review by Game Informer to the review table in the FR/LG article. Do you perhaps have access to the issue of the magazine? If you do, any critical reception from the review that is added to the article would be much appreciated. Cheers, Artichoker 16:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh good. As for Nintendo Power, if there really are five separate scores for the game, I suppose averaging them would be the best course of action (of course you would need to note in the article that you performed that calculation.) Artichoker 16:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)