Misplaced Pages

User talk:Theleftorium: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:43, 24 June 2009 editArtichoker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,994 edits Citing quotations: cmt← Previous edit Revision as of 16:54, 24 June 2009 edit undoArtichoker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,994 edits Citing quotations: cmtNext edit →
Line 214: Line 214:
Per your summary in edit, I was wondering which page says that a citation must immediately follow a quote. Everything I've read just mentions that the quote must be attributed (which it was at the end of the paragraph in the old case). Thanks, ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Per your summary in edit, I was wondering which page says that a citation must immediately follow a quote. Everything I've read just mentions that the quote must be attributed (which it was at the end of the paragraph in the old case). Thanks, ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:I almost think you're taking that too literally. True it states that it should be placed directly after the citation, but I think that is rather to contrast with its other recommended placement. I believe that the way the page was written did not account for the possibility that more info about the review/paper would follow the quote. It simply makes more sense to cite the entire thought, as opposed to attributing every sentence to the same citation. I see I am not alone in my thinking as other video game articles, such as ], take ] just as liberally. What do you think? ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC) :I almost think you're taking that too literally. True it states that it should be placed directly after the citation, but I think that is rather to contrast with its other recommended placement. I believe that the way the page was written did not account for the possibility that more info about the review/paper would follow the quote. It simply makes more sense to cite the entire thought, as opposed to attributing every sentence to the same citation. I see I am not alone in my thinking as other video game articles, such as ], take ] just as liberally. What do you think? ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
::Good idea. I have a query. ''']'''<sup><nowiki>]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 16:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:54, 24 June 2009

Archive
Archives
  1. July–December 2008
  2. January–June 2009

WikiCup Newsletter XXI

The WikiCup Newsletter

The WikiCup Newsletter
Round III, Issue 3 - June 22, 2009

Archive before | Archive after

Pool leaders

In this round of the WikiCup, the top contestant from each pool, along with four wildcards, will advance to the next round. The pool leaders are:

Pool A
  1. Switzerland Sasata (221)
Pool B
  1. Iceland Scorpion0422 (279)
Pool C
  1. Denmark Candlewicke (291)
Pool D
  1. Sweden Theleftorium (336)
Wildcard leaders
  1. Republic of Ireland Juliancolton (217)
  2. Mexico Durova (114)
  3. Japan Wrestlinglover (112)
  4. Colombia ThinkBlue (107)

Content Leaders

As of this newsletter, the following is a list of participants in this round with the most:

WikiCup At a Glance

As of this newsletter, the WikiCup participants have collected a Round 3 total of:

This combines with the Round 1 totals and the Round 2 totals to make a grand total of:


Biggest Jumps

The difference between each contestant's point total from last week, and their point total from this week are:

Rank User LF TF D
1 Iceland Scorpion0422 51 279 225
2 Switzerland Sasata 46 221 175
3 Denmark Candlewicke 171 291 120
4 Sweden Theleftorium 228 336 108
5 Republic of Ireland Juliancolton 118 217 99
6 Colombia ThinkBlue 37 107 70
6 Thailand Rlevse 15 85 70
8 Michigan the_ed17 14 70 56
9 Japan Wrestlinglover 59 112 53
10 Maryland Ottava Rima 46 94 48
  • LF = Last Week's score, TF = This Week's score, D = Difference between last week and this week's scores
  • This was generated from this diff.

From the Judges

Lots of big jumps this week. Some are past/approaching 300, and our current top 8 are all above 100!

Sorry for the late delivery! 'weburiedoursecretsinthegarden,  iMatthew :  Chat  , and The Helpful One


If you don't wish to receive this newsletter in the future, remove your name from this list. If you are not a participant, but would still like to receive this newsletter, feel free to add your name to the list.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 22 June 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:National parks of Sweden

Your Sandbox version looks excellent! Copy that into the article and I think I'm ready to support! Reywas92 16:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
For your excellent work on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Behind the Music that Sucks. I wish more people did like you, respect. Power.corrupts (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Citing quotations

Per your summary in this edit, I was wondering which page says that a citation must immediately follow a quote. Everything I've read just mentions that the quote must be attributed (which it was at the end of the paragraph in the old case). Thanks, Artichoker 15:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I almost think you're taking that too literally. True it states that it should be placed directly after the citation, but I think that is rather to contrast with its other recommended placement. I believe that the way the page was written did not account for the possibility that more info about the review/paper would follow the quote. It simply makes more sense to cite the entire thought, as opposed to attributing every sentence to the same citation. I see I am not alone in my thinking as other video game articles, such as Halo: Combat Evolved, take WP:Citations#When quoting someone just as liberally. What do you think? Artichoker 15:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Good idea. I have composed a query. Artichoker 16:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)