Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:08, 1 July 2009

| Archive page

Order of the Collar of Saint Agatha

I'd like to ask you try not to call edits in a content dispute vandalism, although I understand how frustrating it is to keep reverting POV-pushing over and over. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

This article has been biased if not slanderous. I expanded on some of the subjects and added refrences to sources that would constitute the other side of the argument while retaining the earlier texts with only editorial corrections. When did introducing such references constitute vandalism??

Now: I have been an internet user since 1992 (good ole usenet...) but only recently started to edit things in WikiPediaWikipedia. I stand by my previous edits and would welcome further improvements and additions to them. I shall revert back to my version and ask of Yolpi or whoever to contribute, not axe outright. Or is Yolpi really doing the right thing here?

--Samspensclason (talk) 00:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear Sam..thing, first read WP:NOR, WP:RELY and specially WP:SPS. You added only self-published sources about exceptional claim, and thus you must conform with WP:REDFLAG, this mean that for your claims you must have high-quality sources. If such sources are not available, the material should not be included. --Yopie 08:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Duchy of Münsterberg (Ziębice)

Thanks for your edit, but please remember that this is the English and not the Czech Misplaced Pages. According to the naming conventions English names are preferred. Vilém Opavský was duke of a duchy which is called Duchy of Troppau here. The English equivalent of Vilém is William, and the duke should therefore be called William of Troppau. At least thats how I understand WP:UE. Karasek (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

List of micronations

I have reversed your UNDO of my change to this article. The material I removed already exists as a dedicated article at List of leaders of micronations --203.166.245.85 (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I have reversed your UNDO of my change to this article. The material I added which you removed is simply an addition of Wirtland's flag and leader's name - which are required columns of your table. Contact me if you have any questions, please. Witizen (talk) 19:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Witizen

Reverted - your change was much more than just "an addition of flag and leader's name". Please discuss first. --Ckatz_spy 19:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: edit of 18:03, 28 June 2009 (- not notable) It is, in fact, notable locally. Has been the subject of media attention and appears in the book referenced. Your/wikipedia's definition of 'notable' before I revert the changes? Thanks.DominicCyninge (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.10.124 (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You say it himself - this micronation is notable only locally. Please, read WP:N.--Yopie 16:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

External links were deleted, because they don't comply with WP:ELNO, as was explained. For example "Links normally to be avoided - Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace and Facebook), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists."--Yopie 11:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Wirtland

External links were deleted, because they don't comply with WP:ELNO, as was explained. For example "Links normally to be avoided - Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace and Facebook), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists."--Yopie 11:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for this clarification. In that case, it would be nice if the rest of deleted links would be restored. As I explained, in writing the Wirtland entry, we followed the model of Atlantium article. I am willing to comply with all requirements, of course, and wish to thank everybody for valuable edits. However, we see that features acceptable in Atlantium article are under attack in Wirtland article. Same applies to notices about conflict of interest and self-published sources, inserted in Wirtland entry. I hope we don't have double standards here? Witizen (talk)Witizen

Please

1) use talk page of article, not personal.

2) read

3) Atlantium was corrected, but have only one "wrong" link, your article was with many.

4) Don´t copy and paste text from other pages.--Yopie 12:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Masaryk University

Hi Yopie. May I copy your comment to Talk:Greek love? It's probably a better place for the discussion. I already replied there. --Vejvančický (talk) 22:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, of course.--Yopie 23:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)