Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chris G: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:20, 11 July 2009 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,830 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Chris G/Archives/2009/July. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 01:58, 12 July 2009 edit undoTedder (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators62,275 edits OTDB deleted a talk page to an article that exists: stop the bot.Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:
I just stumbled about the fact that there is a bot deleting orphaned talk pages. But where is more info about what he does? And did the community approve this? Lastly, why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages, which looks like a much more helpful approach to me? ] (]) 10:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC) I just stumbled about the fact that there is a bot deleting orphaned talk pages. But where is more info about what he does? And did the community approve this? Lastly, why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages, which looks like a much more helpful approach to me? ] (]) 10:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
:Yes '''she''' (bots are like ships :P) is ]. "why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages" why waste admin time when a bot can do just as good a job? There is a shortage of admins so any bot that can help clear out the backlogs is a good idea IMO. --] 11:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC) :Yes '''she''' (bots are like ships :P) is ]. "why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages" why waste admin time when a bot can do just as good a job? There is a shortage of admins so any bot that can help clear out the backlogs is a good idea IMO. --] 11:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

== OTDB deleted a talk page to an article that exists ==

] was deleted today, . So why was it deleted? ] (]) 01:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

:Um, '''you need to stop the bot'''. I looked through the ] and it seems to be widespread- not all, but perhaps over 50%. ] (]) 01:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:58, 12 July 2009

User:Chris G User talk:Chris G Special:Emailuser/Chris G User:Chris G/Bots User:Chris G/Awards
User Talk Email Bots Awards

Template:Archive box collapsible

Chris G Bot 3

Could you take a look?Juliancolton |  06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Should be fixed. --Chris 08:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned talkpage deletion bot Problem

Somebody (or somebodies, I haven't looked into who yet) has configured ClueBot III incorrectly for talk page archiving. This has caused ClueBot III to archive a whole bunch of talk pages at "Talk:Page 1" instead of "Talk:Page/Archive 1". Your bot is deleting those archive pages. This is content that really needs to be kept and moved to the correct place. ClueBot III should protect against this, but it would also be good for your bot to check for this. If a page is created by one of the archiving bots and is linked to from another page (especially from ClueBot's index pages), it's probably something that needs to be fixed vs. deleted. There are quite a few pages that need restoration and fixing. I'll put a similar note at ClueBot III's talk to ask it's operator to put a check in place. I'll also post a note at WP:AN to see if people want to help with the clean-up. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Responded at AN. --Chris 02:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 6 July 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

More infos, pls! And why deleting?

I just stumbled about the fact that there is a bot deleting orphaned talk pages. But where is more info about what he does? And did the community approve this? Lastly, why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages, which looks like a much more helpful approach to me? Gray62 (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes she (bots are like ships :P) is approved. "why delete pages, instead of listing the links on the user pages" why waste admin time when a bot can do just as good a job? There is a shortage of admins so any bot that can help clear out the backlogs is a good idea IMO. --Chris 11:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

OTDB deleted a talk page to an article that exists

Talk:Ed Dickson was deleted today, the article has existed for over a week. So why was it deleted? tedder (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Um, you need to stop the bot. I looked through the trial log and it seems to be widespread- not all, but perhaps over 50%. tedder (talk) 01:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC)