| Revision as of 18:26, 22 July 2009 editTimmeh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,169 edits United States presidential election, 2004← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:15, 23 July 2009 edit undoTimmeh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,169 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on United States presidential election, 2004. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ==United States presidential election, 2004== | ==United States presidential election, 2004== | ||
| Hi. Please do not change the images or their sizes at ]. Yours were much too large and didn't match with each other (closeup of Bush, full-body of Kerry). If you do not like the images as they are now, please bring up the issue on the article's talk page, explaining why you think they should be changed. Thank you. ]] 18:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | Hi. Please do not change the images or their sizes at ]. Yours were much too large and didn't match with each other (closeup of Bush, full-body of Kerry). If you do not like the images as they are now, please bring up the issue on the article's talk page, explaining why you think they should be changed. Thank you. ]] 18:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:United States presidential election, 2004|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]] 00:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | |||
Revision as of 00:15, 23 July 2009
May 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States presidential election, 1936, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United States presidential election, 1936 was changed by 82.16.113.24 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-05-24T20:28:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to say Hoover was from California, you'll need to cite a reliable source. Tom Harrison 20:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I have temporarily suspended your editing rights. Tom Harrison 11:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Nick Cotton
We don't yet know if he's dead or not, so I've reverted your edit. As you say, viewers will find out in due course and there is no need for us to speculate. Rodhullandemu 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
United States Presidential Election Articles
Please stop adding material about who won New York State and New York City to presidential election articles, unless it happens to be notable in regard to that specific election. I have removed several edits of this nature because it had no particular relevance to the article. While New York state and city has millions of voters it is not necessary to mention it in every article. In the United States presidential election, 1960 article you repeatedly have added info about how close it was (which it was not close as defined by consensus here at wikipedia) in New York and how if different the election would have had a different ramifications. This can also be said for several other states some of which were actually close.
I have also removed numerous edits of yours similar to this one in the 1936 election article "Roosevelt carried all the famous cities in the United States, including New York City, Los Angeles, San Antonio, Dallas, Houston, Chicago and Boston". This was removed because it was unreferenced, expressed POV (your opinion of which cities are famous) (What about Detroit, Philadelphia are these not famous cities?) This info also has no place in the lead of an article if it were to be notable enough for inclusion, which it is not it would belong in the results section. Highground79 (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to ZIP code. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. --JBC3 (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
United States presidential election, 2004
Hi. Please do not change the images or their sizes at United States presidential election, 2004. Yours were much too large and didn't match with each other (closeup of Bush, full-body of Kerry). If you do not like the images as they are now, please bring up the issue on the article's talk page, explaining why you think they should be changed. Thank you. Timmeh 18:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election, 2004. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Timmeh 00:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.