Revision as of 06:59, 28 March 2009 editCroctotheface (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,855 edits →Indiana University study: this is better--it's still about the same topic (Mitchell's op/ed), so it belongs in the same paragraph← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:10, 30 July 2009 edit undoVanished user 58234729 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,248 edits →Al Franken: rm stuff about lawsuit; is only marginally related to criticism of O'Reilly, and O'Reilly's affirmation of his pursual of the lawsuit is not a response to the criticism in the bookNext edit → | ||
(160 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --> | |||
{{Refimprove|date=March 2009}} | |||
{{AfDM|page=Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination)|date=2009 July 29|substed=yes|origtag=afdx|help=off}} | |||
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> | |||
Over the years, there have been several issues highlighted in American political commentator ]'s print and broadcast work. He has drawn criticism from several individuals and groups including ], ],<ref name="Bill Moyers">{{cite web|url=http://www.freepress.net/node/41488|title=Bill O'Reilly Thinks You're Crazy|publisher=Free Press|accessdate=2008-08-28|author=Silver, J}}</ref> ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
Over the years, there have been several issues highlighted in American political commentator ]'s print and broadcast work. He has drawn criticism from several individuals and groups, which include media personalities such as ], ],<ref name="Bill Moyers">{{cite web|url=http://www.freepress.net/node/41488|title=Bill O'Reilly Thinks You're Crazy|publisher=Free Press|accessdate=2008-08-28|author=Silver, J}}</ref> ], ], and ]. He has also been criticized by progressive media watchdog groups such as ], ], and ]. | |||
==Analysis of Bill O'Reilly and his methods== | ==Analysis of Bill O'Reilly and his methods== | ||
===Indiana University study=== | ===Indiana University study=== | ||
In early 2007, researchers from the ] School of Journalism published a report in the ] ''Journalism Studies'' that analyzed the Talking Points Memo segment |
In early 2007, researchers from the ] School of Journalism published a report in the ] ''Journalism Studies'' that analyzed the Talking Points Memo segment. Using analysis techniques developed in the 1930s by the ], the researchers compared O'Reilly's comments and style to a 1939 study of Father ]. The study found that O'Reilly used ] far more often than Coughlin, was three times more likely to engage in ], and consistently cast non-Americans as threats and never in the role of victim or hero."<ref>{{cite web|author = Indiana University|url= http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/5535.html|title = Content analysis of O'Reilly's Rhetoric find spin to be a 'factor'}}</ref><ref>Mike Conway, Maria Elizabeth Grabe, and Kevin Grieves, "," ''Journalism Studies'' 8:2 (2007).</ref> | ||
O'Reilly criticized the study, asserting that "the terms '],' '],' '],' '],' '],' 'traditional' |
O'Reilly criticized the study, asserting that "the terms '],' '],' '],' '],' '],' 'traditional' and ']' were considered name-calling if they were associated with a problem or social ill." The study's authors responded that those terms were only considered as name-calling when linked to derogatory qualifiers, for instance "Kool-Aid left".<ref name="LATimes-Conway">Mike Conway, Maria Elizabeth Grabe and Kevin Grieves, ], , May 16, 2007. Retrieved May 18, 2007.</ref> O'Reilly also claimed that Indiana University has received millions of dollars from ]' ],<ref>O'Reilly B, , ''Foxnews.com'', May 4, 2007. Accessed May 10, 2007.</ref> to which the authors responded that they had "received no funding for this study".<ref name="LATimes-Conway" /> | ||
Fox News producer Ron Mitchell |
Fox News producer Ron Mitchell wrote an op-ed in which he accused the study's authors of seeking to manipulate their research to fit a predetermined outcome. Mitchell argued that by using tools developed for examining propaganda, the researchers presupposed that O'Reilly propagandized.<ref>Mitchell R, , ''LATimes.com (Opinion)'', May 10, 2007, Accessed May 10, 2007.</ref> | ||
=== Marvin Kitman and his O'Reilly biography=== | |||
===FAIR's Peter Hart=== | |||
Peter Hart, a media analyst for ], co-authored ''The Oh Really Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly.''<ref>{{cite web | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2008-05-20 | url = https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/592/t/6157/shop/item.jsp?storefront_KEY=56&t=&store_item_KEY=285 | title = ''The Oh Really? Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly'' }}</ref> In the 2004 documentary '']'', Hart states that '']'' is a "perfect example" of what is wrong with Fox News, alleging that the ] gets favored treatment over the ] on O'Reilly's show, as well as the network in general.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.outfoxed.org/docs/outfoxed_transcript.pdf |format=PDF| title = Outfoxed - transcript pgs 49-50 | accessdate = 2007-05-05 }}</ref> | |||
In January 2007, ] released the biography ''The Man Who Would Not Shut Up: The Rise of Bill O'Reilly'', written by longtime '']'' TV critic Marvin Kitman. O'Reilly initially cooperated with the author by giving him 29 interviews. According to Kitman, O'Reilly was going to help promote and publicize the book until, just prior to publication, they had a disagreement over the inclusion of a chapter covering ]' 2004 sexual harassment lawsuit against O'Reilly.<ref>{{citenews | first=Frank | last=Lovece | coauthors= | title=O'Reilly bio may surprise fans and foes |date=2007-01-18 | publisher=Newsday.com | url=http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:hsc2TXHKEY0J:www.newsday.com/features/booksmags/ny-etkit5055225jan18,0,883143.story+%22Marvin+Kitman%22+biography+reilly&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=42&gl=us | work= | pages= | accessdate =2007-06-22 }}Accessed via Google cache</ref>{{Dead link|date=March 2009}} After the book came out with the chapter included, Kitman asserted that O'Reilly attempted to bury it by "intimidating" and "terrorizing" Fox News prime time shows to keep them from inviting Kitman.<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman">{{cite web|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17419934/ |title='Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for March 1 - Countdown with Keith Olbermann - MSNBC.com |publisher=MSNBC |date=2007-03-02 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
=== Selective editing === | |||
On the June 24, 2004, edition of ]'s ''The O'Franken Factor'', a show humorously named after ''The O'Reilly Factor'', ] law professor ] told host ] about an incident that occured while he appeared on the June 21 edition of O'Reilly's show. Cole claimed that as the episode's Talking Points Memo segment was being taped, O'Reilly told his producers to re-record the segment in order to prevent the airing of footage showing ] governor and ] chairman ] confirming that no evidence was found to suggest a link between ]'s regime in ] and the ] terrorist network. After this was done, Cole alleged, O'Reilly then claimed that Kean had confirmed that there was indeed a link between the two groups, without playing the footage. Cole also claimed that when he directly challenged O'Reilly for his deception in the subsequent interview, O'Reilly went "berserk", called his guest an "]", and "said I would never, ever be invited to be on the show again." Cole finally claimed that when the interview was finally broadcast that night, the portion of the interview showing Cole's confrontation and O'Reilly's subsequent outburst was edited out by Fox News producers<ref>, Media Matters for America, 30 June, 2004</ref>. | |||
In an interview with Keith Olbermann, Kitman criticized O'Reilly as "kind of a hypocrite" by pointing out O'Reilly's belief that journalists should not attempt to flatter or indulge the people they cover.<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman"/> Kitman also said he found it strange that O'Reilly sought to suppress the book when it cast him in a generally favorable light. Kitman said, "This is the only book that‘s ever said anything positive about Bill, except for the six he wrote about himself."<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman"/> Several critics agree that the book's portrayal is fair.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6396133.html |title=Social Sciences - 12/15/2006 - Library Journal |publisher=Libraryjournal.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6387979.html |title=Nonfiction Reviews: Week of 11/6/2006 - 11/6/2006 - Publishers Weekly |publisher=Publisher Weekly |date=2006-11-06 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
In an ''O'Franken Factor'' television broadcast on the ], Franken criticized O'Reilly for selectively and misleadingly editing a ], ] interview of ] by ]. In the interview Biden proposed the submission of legislation for an independent commission to look into wrongdoing in the ]'s prison system at ], ] and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite news | year = 2005 | work = ] | url= http://shows.airamericaradio.com/alfrankenshow/node/2803 | title = GOP Woes Lead to Finger-Pointing; Bin Laden Resurfaces in Attack Ads | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> When O'Reilly analyzed the same interview on ''The Factor'', the broadcast edited out all references Biden made to appointing an independent commission and only presented Biden's call to shut down Guantanamo Bay. O'Reilly accused Biden of misusing the prison abuse story and then presented the missing part of Biden's remarks as his own opinion: "The ] should set up an independent commission to investigate American detainee policy across the board. The president must take the offensive on this, or else the country's image will continue to suffer and the ]ists and their enablers will win another victory." Franken criticized this as a misrepresentation by O'Reilly.<ref>{{cite web | title = Franken vs. O'Reilly | url = http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2671823 | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> | |||
===FAIR's Peter Hart=== | |||
=== Marvin Kitman and his O'Reilly biography=== | |||
Peter Hart, a media analyst for the ] ], co-authored ''The Oh Really Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly.''<ref>{{cite web | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2008-05-20 | url = https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/592/t/6157/shop/item.jsp?storefront_KEY=56&t=&store_item_KEY=285 | title = ''The Oh Really? Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly'' }}</ref> In the 2004 documentary '']'', Hart states that '']'' is a "perfect example" of what is wrong with Fox News, alleging that the ] gets favored treatment over the ] on O'Reilly's show, as well as the network in general.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.outfoxed.org/docs/outfoxed_transcript.pdf |format=PDF| title = Outfoxed - transcript pgs 49-50 | accessdate = 2007-05-05 }}</ref> | |||
=== Factual inaccuracy and selective edits === | |||
Critics of O'Reilly allege that he misleads his audience by presenting false information and also engages in misleading and selective editing. For example, he featured a story about a "national epidemic" of teenage ] gangs who carry pink pistols and try to indoctrinate young girls into lesbianism.<ref name="glaad1">{{cite web|url=http://www.glaad.org/action/calls_detail.php?id=4031 |title=GLAAD: Update: Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor Offers Unsubstantiated Claims in "Lesbian Gang Epidemic" Segment |publisher=Glaad.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/news/item.jsp?aid=274&site_area=1 |title=SPLCenter.org: O'Reilly and lesbian gangs |publisher=Splcenter.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> When confronted on the story by civil rights groups, O'Reilly later admitted it was overhyped but defended its validity.<ref>"," ''Congressional Quarterly'' (16 July 2007).</ref> Furthermore, critics such as Media Matters claims that O'Reilly misleads his audience when he described his upbringing and that he overstates his influence such as when he pointed to a non-existent publication to support his claim that his call for a boycott of French goods cost the French billions of dollars.<ref name="mmfa051027">{{cite web | last = Schweber-Koren | last = Raphael | date = ] | title = O'Reilly again trumpeted "annoying" French boycott | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270012 | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2005-12-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | author = G.W. | date = ] | title = O'Reilly defended old lies exposed by Jack Mathews and MMFA, told new ones | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200407080001 | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2007-01-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | date = ] | publisher = ] | author = G.W. | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200405020006 | title = FOX's O'Reilly fabricated evidence of success of purported boycott}}</ref> | |||
In January 2007, ] released the biography ''The Man Who Would Not Shut Up: The Rise of Bill O'Reilly'', written by longtime '']'' TV critic Marvin Kitman. O'Reilly initially cooperated with the author by giving him 29 interviews. According to Kitman, O'Reilly was going to help promote and publicize the book until, just prior to publication, they had a disagreement over the inclusion of a chapter covering ]' 2004 sexual harassment lawsuit against O'Reilly.<ref>{{citenews | first=Frank | last=Lovece | coauthors= | title=O'Reilly bio may surprise fans and foes |date=2007-01-18 | publisher=Newsday.com | url=http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:hsc2TXHKEY0J:www.newsday.com/features/booksmags/ny-etkit5055225jan18,0,883143.story+%22Marvin+Kitman%22+biography+reilly&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=42&gl=us | work= | pages= | accessdate =2007-06-22 }}Accessed via Google cache</ref>{{Dead link|date=March 2009}} After the book came out with the chapter included, Kitman asserts that O'Reilly, instead of promoting the book, attempted to bury it by "intimidating" and "terrorizing" Fox News prime time shows to keep them from inviting Kitman to appear.<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman">{{cite web|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17419934/ |title='Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for March 1 - Countdown with Keith Olbermann - MSNBC.com |publisher=MSNBC |date=2007-03-02 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
On June 24, 2004, law professor ] told ] on ] about an alleged incident that occurred while he appeared on the June 21 edition of O'Reilly's show. Cole claimed that as the episode's Talking Points Memo segment was being taped, O'Reilly told his producers to re-record the segment in order to prevent the airing of footage showing former ] governor and ] chairman ] confirming no evidence had been found suggesting a link between ]'s regime in ] and the ] terrorist network. Cole alleged that O'Reilly then claimed Kean had confirmed a link between the two groups, without playing the footage. Cole also said that when he directly challenged O'Reilly's deception, O'Reilly went "berserk", calling his guest a "]", and "said I would never, ever be invited to be on the show again." Cole said that when the interview was broadcast that night, the portion of the interview showing Cole's confrontation and O'Reilly's subsequent outburst was edited out by Fox News producers<ref>, Media Matters for America, 30 June, 2004</ref>. | |||
In an interview with Keith Olbermann, Kitman criticized O'Reilly as "kind of a hypocrite" by pointing out O'Reilly's belief that journalists should not attempt to flatter or indulge the people they cover. "Throughout all my interviews," Kitman said, " was telling me that nobody could ever tell him what question to ask, or what to say." However, when the subject was O'Reilly himself, Kitman said that "it turned out that he‘s not so much in favor of telling it like it is, but like it isn‘t".<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman"/> Kitman also said he found it strange that O'Reilly sought to suppress the book when it cast him in a generally favorable light. When speaking to Olbermann, Kitman said, "This is the only book that‘s ever said anything positive about Bill, except for the six he wrote about himself."<ref name="Olbermann-Kitman"/> Several critics agree that the book's portrayal is fair.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6396133.html |title=Social Sciences - 12/15/2006 - Library Journal |publisher=Libraryjournal.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6387979.html |title=Nonfiction Reviews: Week of 11/6/2006 - 11/6/2006 - Publishers Weekly |publisher=Publisher Weekly |date=2006-11-06 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
Franken also criticized O'Reilly for alleged selective and misleading editing in an interview of ] by ]. In the interview Biden proposed the submission of legislation for an independent commission to look into wrongdoing in the ]'s prison system at ], ] and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite news | year = 2005 | work = ] | url= http://shows.airamericaradio.com/alfrankenshow/node/2803 | title = GOP Woes Lead to Finger-Pointing; Bin Laden Resurfaces in Attack Ads | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> When O'Reilly analyzed the same interview on ''The Factor'', the broadcast edited out all references Biden made to appointing an independent commission and only presented Biden's call to shut down Guantanamo Bay. O'Reilly accused Biden of misusing the prison abuse story and then presented the missing part of Biden's remarks as his own opinion: "The ] should set up an independent commission to investigate American detainee policy across the board. The president must take the offensive on this, or else the country's image will continue to suffer and the ]ists and their enablers will win another victory."<ref>{{cite web | title = Franken vs. O'Reilly | url = http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2671823 | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> | |||
===Conflicting comments on teen pregnancy=== | |||
O'Reilly has also been criticized for his interview style such as when he and Congressman Barney Frank got into a very heated argument during a discussion of the ongoing financial crisis,<ref>http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:7_zyKC1ahIsJ:www.advocate.com/issue_story_ektid67124.asp+the+advocate+bill+o'reilly&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_10_04_Barney_Frank__Bill_O_Reilly_turn_nasty_in_on-air_battle/srvc=home&position=also |title=Barney Frank, Bill O’Reilly turn nasty in on-air battle - BostonHerald.com |publisher=News.bostonherald.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/03/bill-oreilly-and-barney-f_n_131569.html |title=Bill O'Reilly And Barney Frank Face-Off Over Fannie & Freddie |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> and when he cut off the microphone of anti-war protester Jeremy Glick.<ref>Jack Shafer, ], , Aug. 28, 2003. Retrieved October 20, 2007.</ref><ref>John Colapinto, ], , Aug. 11, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2007.</ref> Furthermore, he has also been criticized for being insensitive to certain victims and groups. An example of this was Shawn Hornbeck whom O'Reilly inferred that there was an element that he liked about this circumstances.<ref> Christina Boyle, ''New York Daily News'' (19 January 2007) p. 23.</ref> He also received criticism for comments that were taken to mean that San Francisco should not receive government protection from Al Qaeda after the city passed a ballot measure that declared the city's opposition to "the federal government's use of public schools to recruit students for service in the military."<ref>{{cite web | author = San Francisco Department of Elections | year = 2005 | title = No Military Recruiters in Public Schools, Scholarships for Education and Job Training | url = http://www.sfgov.org/site/election_index.asp?id=33918 | publisher = San Francisco Department of Elections | accessdate = 2005-12-27 }}</ref></s> | |||
O'Reilly criticized the news media for addressing the matter of Vice Presidential nominee ]'s seventeen year-old, unwed daughter's pregnancy. O'Reilly claimed it was a strictly private family matter and that Palin could not be responsible for her daughter's actions. The ]'s Editorial Page Editor ], ] and the ] each noted that O'Reilly himself had several months earlier criticized another unwed pregnant teenager, ], sixteen at the time, labeling her a "pinhead" and calling her parents irresponsible. | |||
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/tucker/stories/2008/09/03/tucked_0903.html|title=Concern, care for Palin’s teen should extend to all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&title=Sarah-Palin-Gender-Card|title=Sarah Palin Gender Card}}</ref> | |||
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/cynthia-tucker-vs-bill-or_b_124032.html|title=Cynthia Tucker vs. Bill O'Reilly: Does Palin Deserve Criticism for Daughter's Pregnancy?}}</ref><ref>http://newsone.com/elections/article/jamie-lynn-spears-and-bristol-palin-show-limbaugh-and-oreillys-hypocrisy</ref> | |||
In response to Tucker's criticism, O'Reilly sent a producer to confront her outside her home. During the brief confrontation, Tucker defended her column and her opinion that O'Reilly is a "hypocrite."{{Fact|date=March 2009}} | |||
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003846022 |title=Cynthia Tucker and Bill O'Reilly Battle Over Views of Palin and Daughter's Baby |publisher=Editorandpublisher.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> | |||
<ref>http://.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/09/04/cynthia-tucker-and-bill-oreilly-are-a-feudin/</ref> | |||
==Critics and rivals== | ==Critics and rivals== | ||
O'Reilly has been involved in numerous controversies and rivalries with various people and organizations. Some of the more notable are ], ] and ]. | O'Reilly has been involved in numerous controversies and rivalries with various people and organizations. Some of the more notable are ], ], ] of ] and ]. | ||
===Media Matters for America=== | ===Media Matters for America=== | ||
Line 43: | Line 40: | ||
O'Reilly has referred to Media Matters as "smear merchants," and "the most vile, despicable human beings on the planet," and has expressed distaste for the site he claims is funded by George Soros.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171328,00.html | title = Unresolved Problem: Political Smear Sites | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> Media Matters maintains that it has never received funding from Soros "either directly or through another organization."<ref></ref> | O'Reilly has referred to Media Matters as "smear merchants," and "the most vile, despicable human beings on the planet," and has expressed distaste for the site he claims is funded by George Soros.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171328,00.html | title = Unresolved Problem: Political Smear Sites | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> Media Matters maintains that it has never received funding from Soros "either directly or through another organization."<ref></ref> | ||
Media Matters founder ] says that he has repeatedly requested that O'Reilly debate him on O'Reilly's program and that O'Reilly has refused. Media Matters also says that O’Reilly has not been able to specifically challenge the accuracy of Media Matters’s criticism.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://mediamatters.org/items/200412160011 | title = Letter from David Brock to Bill O'Reilly | date = ] | first = David | last = Brock | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> | |||
===Al Franken=== | ===Al Franken=== | ||
].]] | ].]] | ||
]'s 2003 book '']'' included a picture of O'Reilly on the cover and a chapter devoted to him inside. In his book, Franken accused O'Reilly of distorting facts both to serve conservative politics and to improve his public image |
]'s 2003 book '']'' included a picture of O'Reilly on the cover and a chapter devoted to him inside. In his book, Franken accused O'Reilly of distorting facts both to serve conservative politics and to improve his public image. | ||
Following the ] argument, ] for ] over the use of the phrase "fair and balanced" in the book's title. O'Reilly has generally said that he was not involved in the lawsuit.{{Fact|date=March 2009}} In an interview with '']'', O'Reilly was asked if he "regrets pushing the lawsuit against Al Franken", to which he replied, "Not at all."<ref>{{cite web|last=Stengel |first=Richard |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,490678,00.html |title=10 Questions For Bill O'Reilly - TIME |publisher=Time.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> When the case reached court, the presiding judge denied Fox's request for ] and described the case as "wholly without merit, both factually and legally". | |||
<ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0CE5DE1439F930A1575BC0A9659C8B63 | |||
|title="In Courtroom, Laughter at Fox And a Victory For Al Franken" | |||
|accessdate=2008-06-19 | |||
|last=Saulny | |||
|first=Susan | |||
|date=2003-08-03 | |||
|publisher='']'' | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
Fox then dropped the suit. O'Reilly later said he had considered personally suing Franken for ] but was told that, as a public person, the ] would be too high to sustain a lawsuit.{{Fact|date=March 2009}} | |||
===Keith Olbermann=== | ===Keith Olbermann=== | ||
{{seealso|Countdown with Keith Olbermann#Olbermann vs. O'Reilly}} | {{seealso|Countdown with Keith Olbermann#Olbermann vs. O'Reilly}} | ||
Olbermann's show '']'' on ], which airs opposite ''The O'Reilly Factor'', is highly critical of O'Reilly. Olbermann frequently names O'Reilly in the "Worst Persons in the World" segment of the program. | Olbermann's show '']'' on ], which airs opposite ''The O'Reilly Factor'', is highly critical of O'Reilly. Olbermann frequently names O'Reilly in the "Worst Persons in the World" segment of the program. | ||
===2008 financial bailout: criticism of right wing radio=== | |||
O'Reilly criticized conservative radio hosts for opposing the $700 billion ]. He said, "Most talk radio is conservative-dominated, ideologue, Kool-Aid–drinking idiots." Conservative radio host ] fired back by calling O'Reilly "another mainstream, moron, phony journalist".<ref></ref><ref> of ] and ]</ref> | |||
===Dispute with Bill Moyers and Free Press=== | |||
]]] | |||
During the ], O'Reilly sent producer ] to question ]. According to critics, the conduct and goal of Porter Barry was to "ambush" Moyers and set up an attack piece.<ref name="Bill Moyers"/><ref name="KO Ambush">{{cite video|title=Countdown with Keith Olbermann|people=Olbermann, Kieth|publisher=msnbc|date2=2008-06-10}}</ref><!--and we are leaving out the critics side of the argument on a article titled criticism? How is that objective coverage?!--> In his questioning, Porter repetitively asked why Bill Moyers did not agree to go on O'Reilly's show and said that he had played "games" with O'Reilly. Moyers denied playing games and Porter did not specify what those "games" were. <ref name="actual video"><!--Video Is In Countdown Cite, therefore NOT a OR. It is just for directness, also was on FP site (although they replaced it with KO's)-->{{cite video|title=NCMR Footage (Via youtube)|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_2IZT4VgDY|publisher=Uptake/Free Press}}</ref> In response to Barry's questions asking why he wouldn't go on Bill's show, Moyers said that: {{quote|"Rupert Murdoch said the best thing that will come out of the Iraq War would be gasoline at $20 a barrel. Now today when I came here I looked at it and it was 130 and something dollars. When is Rupert going to explain why the war didn't give us $20 a barrel?"|Bill Moyers}} | |||
and that he would | |||
{{quote|"come on the O'Reilly show first after Rupert Murdoch has explained why we are not getting $20 a barrel of oil for the Iraq War he said would deliver. Secondly I will come on Bill O'Reilly's show after he accepts my invitation to be on my show unedited. I'll give him a whole hour. You go back and take that message. But let's see if the message gets on the air. And if it doesn't, you know, if you want a job, I may have some recommendations for you."|Bill Moyers}}<ref name="KO Ambush"/> | |||
Furthermore, Moyers called O'Reilly a "pugilist", not a journalist, and claimed that another of Bill O'Reilly's producers had ambushed him previously.<ref name="actual video"/> | |||
After speaking with Moyers, several reporters questioned Porter Barry using what they claimed were the same tactics he used on Moyers, as the producer left.<ref name="KO Ambush"/><ref name="actual video"/> | |||
''The O'Reilly Factor'' did not air the interview, and instead called the NCMR a "far-left fiesta",<ref>{{cite video|title=The O'Reilly Factor|people=O'Reilly, Bill|date2=2008-06-09|publisher=Fox News}}</ref> in addition to previously calling Free Press "crazy" and "fascist".<ref name="Bill Moyers"/> | |||
In response, ], which supports the NCMR, launched a campaign saying O'Reilly was not a journalist, and that he should stop calling himself one. <ref name="Bill Moyers"/> | |||
==Notable controversies== | ==Notable controversies== | ||
Bill O'Reilly has been involved in several controversies throughout the years. | Bill O'Reilly has been involved in several controversies throughout the years. | ||
=== Malmedy massacre controversy === | |||
On ], ], retired four-star general ] was a guest on ''The O'Reilly Factor''. A topic of debate on the program was a ruling regarding the potential release of more photos from the infamous ] prison in Iraq. Clark defended the release of the additional Abu Ghraib photos saying the country needed to know what happened. While debating with Clark, O'Reilly incorrectly stated a historical fact of ] when he said "General, you need to look at the ] in World War II and the ] that did it." That massacre was the killing of 84 American soldiers by the Germans in the town of ], ] during World War II.<ref>Charles MacDonald (1984). A Time For Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-553-34226-6.</ref> | |||
The next day, on ], ], O'Reilly addressed a viewer email regarding the inaccuracy. As reported on ''The O'Reilly Factor'', the email came from a ] Texas viewer named Donn Caldwell and stated: "Bill, you mentioned Malmedy as the site of an American massacre during World War II. It was the other way around, the ] shot down U.S. prisoners." O'Reilly responded to this by saying: "In the heat of the debate with General Clark my statement wasn't clear enough Mr. Caldwell. After Malmedy, some German captives were executed by American troops."<ref>{{cite news | first=Keith | last=Olbermann | coauthors= | title=]| date=2006-06-01 | publisher= | url =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHUGCkROwJE | work =MSNBC | pages = | accessdate = 2008-06-06 | language = En}}</ref> | |||
According to Keith Olbermann and Media Matters, Fox News' website edited the transcript of O'Reilly's second interview with Clark, changing the line to, "In '']'', as you know, U.S. forces captured SS forces" when the video clearly shows that O'Reilly said "Malmedy" rather than "Normandy."<ref>{{cite news | first=Keith | last=Olbermann | coauthors= | title=]| date=2006-06-01 | publisher= | url =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHUGCkROwJE | work =MSNBC | pages = | accessdate = 2008-06-06 | language = En}}</ref> | |||
This second instance of O'Reilly misstating the facts of the massacre, combined with his denial of doing so and the apparent cover up in the transcript by Fox News prompted a harsh response by Olbermann on the ], ] edition of ]'s ''Countdown with Keith Olbermann.''<ref>{{cite news | first=Keith | last=Olbermann | coauthors= | title=Keith Olbermann Neuters Bill O'Reilly | date=2006-06-02 | publisher= | url =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2KU02lsfH8&NR=1 | work =MSNBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-12-21 | language = }}</ref> Olbermann showed video clips of O'Reilly making these incorrect statements from the October 3 and May 30 editions of ''The O'Reilly Factor'' and showed the clip of O'Reilly addressing the viewer email the following day. | |||
Olbermann lambasted O'Reilly, calling him a "false patriot who would rather be loud than right." He also compared the editing of the transcript to ]'s ]. | |||
After the airing, Fox News corrected the afore-mentioned transcript on June 2, which was noted in a follow up report on ''Countdown with Keith Olbermann'' the following Monday.<ref>{{cite news | first=Keith | last=Olbermann | coauthors= | title=Keith Olbermann Points Out Bill O'Reilly Yet To Apologize | date=2006-06-05 | publisher=YouTube | url =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GebrR6BNPsw&watch_response | work =MSNBC Countdown with Keith Olbermann | pages = | accessdate = 2007-12-21 | language = }}</ref> | |||
===Jeremy Glick=== | |||
On his televised program on ], ], O'Reilly interviewed Jeremy Glick (co-author of ''Another World is Possible''), whose father had been killed in the ]. Glick had signed an anti-war ad that made comments relating the attacks to atrocities in ], ] and ]. After Glick accused O'Reilly of evoking "9/11 to rationalize everything from domestic plunder to ] aggression worldwide", and also of evoking "sympathy with the 9/11 families" to do the same, O'Reilly became visibly angered with Glick and said, "That's a bunch of crap. I've done more for the 9/11 families by their own admission — I've done more for them than you will ever hope to do". At one point in the interview, O'Reilly told Glick to "shut up" and said, "I don't really care what you think." The short and heated segment ended with O'Reilly giving the command to his staff to cut Glick's microphone.<ref>Jack Shafer, ], , Aug. 28, 2003. Retrieved October 20, 2007.</ref><ref>John Colapinto, ], , Aug. 11, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2007.</ref> | |||
In an interview with '']'', Glick said that O’Reilly said to him after the interview, “Get out of my studio before I tear you to fucking pieces.” Glick also says that he insulted O’Reilly’s show off-camera.<ref></ref> O'Reilly aired the segment, which was recorded "live to tape"<ref>{{cite web|author=Nox Solutions |url=http://www.billoreilly.com/audienceletters;jsessionid=E6A7BB766D6BF7005C74537CFC7437CF |title=BillOReilly.com: Behind the Scenes Q & A |publisher=Billoreilly.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref>, then said to his audience, "If I knew that guy Jeremy Glick was gonna be like that I never would have brought him in here. I feel bad for his family, I really do." Afterward, O'Reilly apologized for Glick's appearance on the show and then accused Glick of touting ], and, based upon the tape and transcript of the interview which MediaMatters posted on its website, falsely claimed that Glick said the Bush administration planned the 9/11 attacks. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200509220012?f=s_search |title=Media Matters - O'Reilly again falsely accused former guest of claiming that Bush "orchestrat[ed] 9-11" |publisher=Mediamatters.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> O'Reilly repeated the false assertion in a subsequent segment with Phil Donahue. | |||
=== Peabody Award === | |||
O'Reilly incorrectly claimed at a ], ] speech at ] in ], ], that '']'', a show he had previously anchored, had won a ]. After watching subsequent broadcast of the speech on ], Al Franken performed a search on ] and found three previous occasions dating back to ], ] where O'Reilly had repeated the incorrect claim. On at least one occasion, O'Reilly used the first-person pronoun "we" and said the show won (plural) "Peabody Awards".<ref name="fair-oreillyness">{{cite news | url = http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1070 | title = Bill O'Reilly's Sheer O'Reillyness | first = Seth | last = Ackerman | coauthors = Peter Hart | work = Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author = Franken, Al | title = ]|publisher = Dutton Books|year = 2003|isbn = 0-525-94764-7}}</ref> After Franken called O'Reilly for a statement, O'Reilly acknowledged that he had made an error and issued a correction on his show. ''Inside Edition'' had in fact won a ] and not a Peabody.<ref name="polk">{{cite news | url = http://www.brooklyn.liu.edu/polk/prev/prev90.html | title = The George Polk Awards for Journalism | publisher = Long Island University | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> The Polk award was given one year after O'Reilly's tenure at ''Inside Edition'' and for work O'Reilly had not been involved with.<ref name="polk"/><ref>{{cite book|author = Franken, Al | title = ]|publisher = Dutton Books|year = 2003|isbn = 0-525-94764-7}}</ref> | |||
Franken called Lloyd Grove, a reporter for ''],'' who called O'Reilly and asked him about his statements. O'Reilly said, "So I got mixed up between a Peabody Award and a Polk Award". Grove published the story on ], ] in his column "The Reliable Source".<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A6352-2001Mar1¬Found=true | title = The Reliable Source | first = Lloyd | last = Grove | work = ] | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref>{{Dead link|date=March 2009}} | |||
Robert Reno of '']'' wrote an opinion piece that used this example to argue that O'Reilly cares more about self-aggrandizement than ]. O'Reilly criticized Reno's article as an example of "attack journalism" and said that "you can't find a transcript where I said ".<ref>{{cite web|last=Maslin |first=Janet |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE1DC1438F932A3575AC0A9659C8B63 |title=BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Franken Retorts, You Decide - New York Times |publisher=Query.nytimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> He has rejected the characterization that he was lying and maintained that he never said that he personally won any such award. Franken and other critics have pointed to O'Reilly's use of "we" to rebut O'Reilly's contention. | |||
===Ludacris and Pepsi=== | |||
In 2002, ] hired rapper ] to be a spokesperson. On August 27, 2002, O'Reilly called for Americans to boycott the product,<ref></ref> due to O'Reilly's opinion that Ludacris' lyrics glamorize a "life of guns, violence, drugs and disrespect of women".<ref></ref> The next day, Pepsi officially dropped Ludacris as a spokesperson, claiming "a responsibility to listen to our customers -- and we've heard from a number of people that they were uncomfortable with our association with this artist."<ref>{{cite news |first= Gary |last= Susman |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= Canned Rapper - Pepsi drops Ludacris after O'Reilly-sparked protest |url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,345308,00.html |work= |publisher= ] |date=29 August 2002 |accessdate=20 February 2009 }}</ref> In his book ''Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them'', Franken pointed out that even though O'Reilly called for the Pepsi boycott because of the vulgarity of Ludacris' lyrics, O'Reilly himself described scenarios of a similarly violent and sexual nature in his novel, '']''. Ludacris has referenced the controversy several times, particularly in the songs "]" and "]". | |||
=== Boycott of French goods === | |||
In March 2003, O'Reilly called for a ] of ] products and services sold in the United States, due to ] ]'s stance on the ].<ref name="mmfa051027">{{cite web | last = Schweber-Koren | last = Raphael | date = ] | title = O'Reilly again trumpeted "annoying" French boycott | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270012 | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2005-12-27}}</ref> In ], ]; O'Reilly said, “They’ve lost billions of dollars in France” as a direct result of his boycott, referring to "The Paris Business Review" as his source, a publication that does not exist. O'Reilly then said about two months later that the boycott caused France to lose $138 million in business compared to the previous year.<ref>{{cite web | author = G.W. | date = ] | title = O'Reilly defended old lies exposed by Jack Mathews and MMFA, told new ones | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200407080001 | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2007-01-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | date = ] | publisher = ] | author = G.W. | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200405020006 | title = FOX's O'Reilly fabricated evidence of success of purported boycott}}</ref> | |||
The ] and Media Matters for America have said that French exports to the US increased during the period of O'Reilly's boycott, citing ] figures.<ref>{{cite news | year = 2005 | publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation | url = http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/sticksandstones.html | title = Sticks and Stones }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | date = ] | publisher = ] | author = R.S.K. | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200508020002 | title = O'Reilly boycotts truth to spin French boycott; falsely claimed it 'hurt France'}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | year = 2006 | publisher = U.S. Census Bureau | author = U.S. Census Bureau | url = http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/product/enduse/imports/c4279.html | title = U.S. Imports from France from 2001 to 2005 }}</ref> | |||
In May 2007 O'Reilly announced he was ending the boycott upon the election of ] as French President.<ref>{{cite web|last=Pitney |first=Nico |url=http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/08/oreilly-lifts-boycott-of-france/ |title=Think Progress » O’Reilly lifts boycott of France |publisher=Thinkprogress.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
===Controversy about O'Reilly's childhood home and upbringing=== | |||
O'Reilly has long said that his inspiration for speaking up for average Americans, or what he calls "the folks", are his ] roots. He has pointed to his boyhood home in ] as a credential. In an interview with '']'', O'Reilly's mother said that her family lived in ],<ref name="lifeoforeilly">{{cite news | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62722-2000Dec12?language=printer | work = ] | title = The Life of O'Reilly | first = Paul | last = Farhi | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> which is a few miles from Levittown. Citing this interview, ], ], and others have accused O'Reilly of distorting his background to create a more working-class image. | |||
O'Reilly has countered that ''The Washington Post'' misquoted his mother,<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.nydailynews.com/news/col/story/185118p-160369c.html | work = ] | title = Gloves of fairness are off | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 | first = Bill | last = O'Reilly }}</ref> and he said his mother still lives in his childhood home, which was built by William Levitt. O'Reilly placed a copy of the house's mortgage, which shows a Levittown postal address, on his website. Levittown was redrawn into a squarish shape<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.nycroads.com/history/1960_metro-4/ | title = New York Metro Maps (1960) | publisher = nycroads.com | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> to conform with the 11756 ], which was introduced in 1963. After this time the O'Reilly home was located in ]. On a 2005 episode of '']'', Franken invited a ] historian onto the show, and she said that O'Reilly's statement about having lived in "the Westbury section of Levittown" was generally accurate and that the house could fairly be described as being in either town. She also said that O'Reilly's neighborhood was not the "hardscrabble" environment he suggested it was.<ref>The Al Franken Show, October 28, 2005.</ref> | |||
O'Reilly has also said, "You don't come from any lower than I came from on an economic scale"<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.observer.com/node/52060 | work = ] | title = Fox News Superstar Bill O'Reilly Wants to Oppose Hillary in 2006! | first = Jason | last = Gay | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-06-19 }}</ref> and that his father "never earned more than $35,000 a year in his life." ] has calculated that adjusted for ], $35,000 in 1978 would be worth over $90,000 in 2001 dollars.<ref name="fair-oreillyness"/> O'Reilly has retorted that his father's $35,000 income only came at the end of his long career, at which point O'Reilly would have been long independent of his parents. <ref>* {{cite book | first=Bill | last=O'Reilly | authorlink=Bill O'Reilly (commentator) | year=2003 | title=Who's Looking Out For You? }}</ref> | |||
=== Inaccurate reporting on "lesbian gangs" === | |||
The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (]) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (]) have each separately criticized O'Reilly for featuring a story about a "national epidemic" of teenage ] gangs who carry pink pistols and try to indoctrinate young girls into lesbianism. GLAAD and the SPLC outlined ways in which the sourcing for the story was flimsy, false, or omitted pertinent facts.<ref name="glaad1">{{cite web|url=http://www.glaad.org/action/calls_detail.php?id=4031 |title=GLAAD: Update: Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor Offers Unsubstantiated Claims in "Lesbian Gang Epidemic" Segment |publisher=Glaad.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/news/item.jsp?aid=274&site_area=1 |title=SPLCenter.org: O'Reilly and lesbian gangs |publisher=Splcenter.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> Rashad Robinson, GLAAD's Senior Director of Media Programs, said, "This type of inaccurate ] perpetuates dangerous stereotypes about lesbians and feeds a climate of ], ] and violence."<ref name="glaad1"/> O’Reilly acknowledged that the story was overhyped, but defended it. "It’s a valid story," he said. "Is it out of control? No." He continued, "I’m not in fear of the lesbians beating me up tonight." Robinson called O'Reilly's response a "non-apology apology" and added that "the story is a complete and total fabrication, and he still has failed to offer one shred of evidence as to why it’s legitimate news."<ref>"," ''Congressional Quarterly'' (16 July 2007).</ref> | |||
===Rapper Nas=== | |||
On ], ] a free concert was scheduled in remembrance of the ]. The concert was scheduled, with headline acts including ], ], ], and ].<ref name=vt.edu>. The ]; the bloodiest school massacre in U.S. history, had taken place earlier that year, on April 16, 2007, when student ], killed 32 and wounded more, before committing ]. Retrieved on August 1, 2007.</ref> When it was announced that Nas was to perform, O'Reilly and Fox News Channel denounced the concert and called for the removal of the ] citing "violent" lyrics on songs including "Shoot 'Em Up", "Got Urself A Gun", and "Made You Look". During his ''Talking Points Memo'' segment for ], ], an argument erupted in which O'Reilly mentioned not only Nas' lyrical content but the fact that Nas had a "gun conviction" on his ].<ref> Bill O'Reilly.com. August 15, 2007.</ref> Responding to O'Reilly, Nas in an interview with ] said:<ref>Reid, Shaheem. . ]: September 6, 2007.</ref> | |||
{{quote|He doesn't understand the younger generation. He deals with the past. The people he represents are ], older, a generation that has nothing to do with the reality of what's happening now with my generation. ... He's not really on my radar. People like him are supposed to be taught and people like me are supposed to let ]s like him know. I don't take him serious. His shit is all about getting ratings or whatever. I wouldn't honor anything Bill O'Reilly has to say. It just shows you what bloodsuckers do: They abuse something like the Virginia Tech for show ratings. You can't talk to a person like that.}} | |||
Nas later took part in a protest in front of Fox News' headquarters in ] with the Reverend ] in 2008, accusing Fox News of being biased against the ] community.{{Fact|date=March 2009}} | |||
===American Red Cross and the United Way=== | ===American Red Cross and the United Way=== | ||
After the ], O'Reilly devoted substantial time on his television show and wrote pieces accusing the ] and ] of failing to deliver millions of dollars in donated money, raised by the organizations in the name of the disaster, to the families of those killed in the attacks.<ref>, Bill O'Reilly, WorldNetDaily, December 13, 2001</ref> | After the ], O'Reilly devoted substantial time on his television show and wrote pieces accusing the ] and ] of failing to deliver millions of dollars in donated money, raised by the organizations in the name of the disaster, to the families of those killed in the attacks.<ref>, Bill O'Reilly, WorldNetDaily, December 13, 2001</ref> | ||
O'Reilly claimed that the organizations misrepresented their intentions for the money being raised by not distributing all of the 9/11 relief fund to the victims.<ref>, Kevin Curran, NewsMax.com, October 31, 2001</ref> Actor George Clooney responded to O'Reilly's claims, accusing O'Reilly of misstating facts (including confusing the United Way with the Red Cross), sloppy reporting and harming the relief effort by inciting "panic" among potential donors.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1016211,00.html |title=George Clooney Bites Back at Bill O'Reilly - Asia Quake 2004, Bill O'Reilly, George Clooney : People.com |publisher=People.com |author=Sharon Cotliar and Stephen M. Silverman |date=November 7, 2008 |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> Congressional hearings were called on the matter and an investigation by New York State Attorney General ] took place. Bernadette Healey, the president of the Red Cross, resigned shortly thereafter.<ref>, Grant Williams, Philanthropy.com, October 26, 2001</ref> In a statement before the House Ways and Means Committee in November 2001, Congressman ] asserted that media pressure, most notably from O'Reilly, helped cause the Red Cross to increase payments to affected people and helped cause other charities to participate in an oversight database established by Spitzer.<ref>, Hearing on Response by Charitable Organizations to the Recent Terrorist Attacks, Committee on Ways & Means, November 8, 2001</ref> | O'Reilly claimed that the organizations misrepresented their intentions for the money being raised by not distributing all of the 9/11 relief fund to the victims.<ref>, Kevin Curran, NewsMax.com, October 31, 2001</ref> Actor George Clooney responded to O'Reilly's claims, accusing O'Reilly of misstating facts (including confusing the United Way with the Red Cross), sloppy reporting and harming the relief effort by inciting "panic" among potential donors.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1016211,00.html |title=George Clooney Bites Back at Bill O'Reilly - Asia Quake 2004, Bill O'Reilly, George Clooney : People.com |publisher=People.com |author=Sharon Cotliar and Stephen M. Silverman |date=November 7, 2008 |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> Congressional hearings were called on the matter and an investigation by New York State Attorney General ] took place. Bernadette Healey, the president of the Red Cross, resigned shortly thereafter.<ref>, Grant Williams, Philanthropy.com, October 26, 2001</ref> In a statement before the House Ways and Means Committee in November 2001, Congressman ] asserted that media pressure, most notably from O'Reilly, helped cause the Red Cross to increase payments to affected people and helped cause other charities to participate in an oversight database established by Spitzer.<ref>, Hearing on Response by Charitable Organizations to the Recent Terrorist Attacks, Committee on Ways & Means, November 8, 2001</ref> | ||
===Military recruitment in San Francisco schools=== | |||
On ] ], the voters of ] approved ], a ballot measure that declared the city's opposition to "the federal government's use of public schools to recruit students for service in the military."<ref>{{cite web | author = San Francisco Department of Elections | year = 2005 | title = No Military Recruiters in Public Schools, Scholarships for Education and Job Training | url = http://www.sfgov.org/site/election_index.asp?id=33918 | publisher = San Francisco Department of Elections | accessdate = 2005-12-27 }}</ref> In response, O'Reilly stated on his radio show, "You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right in to ], I set up my little presidential podium, and I say listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead. And if ] comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it....We're going to say, "Look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the ]? Go ahead."<ref>{{cite news | last = Garofoli | first = Joe | date = ] | title = Talk host's towering rant: S.F. not worth saving | url = http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/11/MNGFMFMNV41.DTL | work =San Francisco Chronicle | accessdate = 2005-12-27 }}</ref> San Francisco Supervisor ] responded, calling for O'Reilly to be fired from Fox.<ref>{{cite web | last = Garofoli | first = Joe | date = ] | title = Local leaders unleash vitriol at O'Reilly TV host should be fired for comments about city, Daly says | url = http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/12/COIT.TMP | work = San Francisco Chronicle | accessdate = 2005-12-27 }}</ref> O'Reilly refused to apologize, saying his comments were "obviously ]."<ref>{{cite web | last = O'Reilly | first = Bill | authorlink=Bill O'Reilly (commentator) | date = ] | url = http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,176009,00.html | title = San Francisco... Part III | publisher = FOX News Network, LLC (foxnews.com, "Talking Points,";;) | accessdate = 2005-12-27 }}</ref> The proposition's author, ], appeared on ''The O'Reilly Factor'' in response and stated that to the people of San Francisco, the proposition itself was "no laughing matter." | |||
===Shawn Hornbeck=== | |||
] (a former missing child) was found living with 41 year old ] on ], ]. Hornbeck had been kidnapped by Devlin in 2002 at the age of 11. After being discovered, it was revealed that at some point in that four years Devlin had given Hornbeck the freedom to get on the internet, ride his bike, and have friends over. Many members of the media speculated that Hornbeck apparently did not try to escape because of ]. On ], ]'s edition of ''The O'Reilly Factor'', O'Reilly called this analysis into question. He said that he doesn't believe in the Stockholm Syndrome, and that the boy probably preferred not going to school and playing video games to living with his parents. O'Reilly said: "The situation here, for this kid, looks to me to be a lot more fun than what he had under his old parents. He didn't have to go to school, he could run around and do whatever he wanted…there was an element here that this kid liked about this circumstance." He then went on to say that Hornbeck was probably maladjusted before being abducted. He supported his comments with the fact that Hornbeck had piercings and that O'Reilly himself had once taught high school. Following his comments, the ] Chapter of the ] announced that O'Reilly's appearance at a fundraiser where he was to give the keynote address was cancelled. He was replaced by ]. The ''New York Daily News'' reported that "O'Reilly responded that he may find it necessary to apologize to Shawn's parents, Pam and Craig Akers - but not until he learns more. | |||
'This is a complicated, disturbing story,' he said. 'No question this monster Devlin made threats and intimidated Shawn. But teenagers have brains, and Shawn had the freedom to get away if he wanted to.' Shawn was 11 when he was kidnapped."<ref> Christina Boyle, ''New York Daily News'' (19 January 2007) p. 23.</ref> | |||
===Harlem restaurant comments=== | ===Harlem restaurant comments=== | ||
On the ], ] edition of '']'', prior to having a discussion about racial ]s with fellow Fox News commentator and author ],<ref></ref> O'Reilly mentioned a lunch he had with ] at Sylvia's restaurant in ]. Before Williams joined the discussion, he said that he "couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship." Later on the show, while discussing how white America feels that ]pers dominate black culture, Williams stated, "Oh, and it’s just so awful. It’s just so awful because, I mean, it’s literally the sewer come to the surface, and now people take it that the sewer is the whole story", to which O'Reilly responded, "That’s right. That’s right. There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea".<ref></ref><ref name="foxnews1">{{Dead link|date=November 2008}}</ref><ref></ref> | On the ], ] edition of '']'', prior to having a discussion about racial ]s with fellow Fox News commentator and author ],<ref></ref> O'Reilly mentioned a lunch he had with ] at Sylvia's restaurant in ]. Before Williams joined the discussion, he said that he "couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship." Later on the show, while discussing how white America feels that ]pers dominate black culture, Williams stated, "Oh, and it’s just so awful. It’s just so awful because, I mean, it’s literally the sewer come to the surface, and now people take it that the sewer is the whole story", to which O'Reilly responded, "That’s right. That’s right. There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea'".<ref></ref><ref name="foxnews1">{{Dead link|date=November 2008}}</ref><ref></ref> | ||
O'Reilly also said, "I think that black Americans are starting to think more and more for themselves, getting away from the Sharptons and the ] and people trying to lead them into a race-based culture. They're just trying to figure it out. 'Look, I can make it. If I work hard and get educated, I can make it.'"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270001?f=h_latest |title=Media Matters - CNN's Roland Martin on O'Reilly comment: "] of ] said that the notion that black people are just now starting to value education is "ridiculous" and that the notion that black people let Sharpton or Jackson think for them is "nuts". He suggested that O'Reilly's view was "based upon a stereotype" and called on O'Reilly and others who think like him to "wake up".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0709/25/ltm.01.html |title=CNN.com - Transcripts |publisher=Transcripts.cnn.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | O'Reilly also said, "I think that black Americans are starting to think more and more for themselves, getting away from the Sharptons and the ] and people trying to lead them into a race-based culture. They're just trying to figure it out. 'Look, I can make it. If I work hard and get educated, I can make it.'"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270001?f=h_latest |title=Media Matters - CNN's Roland Martin on O'Reilly comment: "] of ] said that the notion that black people are just now starting to value education is "ridiculous" and that the notion that black people let Sharpton or Jackson think for them is "nuts". He suggested that O'Reilly's view was "based upon a stereotype" and called on O'Reilly and others who think like him to "wake up".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0709/25/ltm.01.html |title=CNN.com - Transcripts |publisher=Transcripts.cnn.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | ||
Karl Frisch, spokesman for Media Matters, said O'Reilly's comments were "ignorant and racially charged." O'Reilly responded in his ''Talking Points Memo'' that he believed that Media Matters took him out of context. He defended his comments by saying, "It was an attempt to tell the radio audience that there is no difference black, white, we’re all Americans. The stereotypes they see on television are not true."{{Fact|date=March 2009}} O'Reilly said, "Media Matters distorted the entire conversation and implied I was ] for condemning racism."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298120,00.html |title=FOXNews.com - CNN Goes Over to the Dark Side - Bill O’Reilly | The O’Reilly Factor |publisher=Foxnews.com |date=September 26, 2007 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | Karl Frisch, spokesman for Media Matters, said O'Reilly's comments were "ignorant and racially charged." O'Reilly responded in his ''Talking Points Memo'' that he believed that Media Matters took him out of context. He defended his comments by saying, "It was an attempt to tell the radio audience that there is no difference black, white, we’re all Americans. The stereotypes they see on television are not true."{{Fact|date=March 2009}} O'Reilly said, "Media Matters distorted the entire conversation and implied I was ] for condemning racism."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298120,00.html |title=FOXNews.com - CNN Goes Over to the Dark Side - Bill O’Reilly | The O’Reilly Factor |publisher=Foxnews.com |date=September 26, 2007 |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | ||
In an interview with Keith Olbermann, Eugene Robinson of ''The Washington Post'' said that O'Reilly's initial remarks were "casually racist" and that O'Reilly's attempts to cast himself as the victim of a smear campaign were disingenuous.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270005?f=i_latest |title=Media Matters - Wash. Post 's Robinson on O'Reilly: "]'', ] said that, contrary to O'Reilly's position, "The more context you hear, the worse it gets." Geist also said that O'Reilly might not understand the nature of his comments or why they would spark controversy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270002 |title=Media Matters - Scarborough: Fox's coverage of O'Reilly's comments suggests he "has nothing to do with" controversy |publisher=Mediamatters.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
On the ] blog, author ] wrote that the comments "looked and sounded dumb and racist", but O'Reilly "didn't say anything that was earth shatteringly offensive" or anything that others might not say in private.<ref></ref> Also on the Huffington Post, Eric Deggans, chairman of the Black Journalists Media Monitoring Committee, said that O'Reilly's history of using racially charged rhetoric suggests that he stereotyped black people as "either vocal protesters like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson or straight-up thugs like ]" Deggans said that he found it unfortunate that it "took a lunch with Al Sharpton" for O'Reilly to realize otherwise.<ref>{{cite web|author=Eric Deggans |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-deggans/judging-bill-oreilly-wh_b_65914.html |title=Eric Deggans: Judging Bill O'Reilly: Why His Comments About Lunch in Harlem Matter - Media on The Huffington Post |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | |||
] said the criticism of O'Reilly was “rank dishonesty” and that the original comments "had nothing to do with racist ranting by anybody except by these idiots at CNN."{{Fact|date=March 2009}} Williams went on to say it was "frustrating" that the media try to criticize anyone who wanted to have an honest discussion about race.<ref name="foxnews1"/> | ] said the criticism of O'Reilly was “rank dishonesty” and that the original comments "had nothing to do with racist ranting by anybody except by these idiots at CNN."{{Fact|date=March 2009}} Williams went on to say it was "frustrating" that the media try to criticize anyone who wanted to have an honest discussion about race.<ref name="foxnews1"/> | ||
Line 162: | Line 68: | ||
On the ], host ] said, "I thought Bill O'Reilly was saying that we should not be surprised." He said O'Reilly's point is that "the small group of people" who think that certain rappers represent all African Americans "need to get out and live life a little bit". Lauer later speculated that O'Reilly would want to get "a do-over" and phrase his comments differently.<ref>, NBC, September 26, 2007.</ref> | On the ], host ] said, "I thought Bill O'Reilly was saying that we should not be surprised." He said O'Reilly's point is that "the small group of people" who think that certain rappers represent all African Americans "need to get out and live life a little bit". Lauer later speculated that O'Reilly would want to get "a do-over" and phrase his comments differently.<ref>, NBC, September 26, 2007.</ref> | ||
Following the controversy, Jesse Jackson made his first appearance on the ''O'Reilly Factor''. |
Following the controversy, Jesse Jackson made his first appearance on the ''O'Reilly Factor''. {{Fact|date=April 2009}} Jackson asked O'Reilly what he had intended by his comments and said that "to underestimate the civility of black people was offensive" but that the controversy over O'Reilly's remarks had obscured other, more important issues.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200709280007 |title=Media Matters - Rev. Jackson to O'Reilly: "[T]o underestimate the civility of blacks was insulting to many people" |publisher=Mediamatters.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> | ||
===Controversy about O'Reilly's childhood home and upbringing=== | |||
==="Lynching party" comment=== | |||
O'Reilly has long said that his inspiration for speaking up for average Americans, or what he calls "the folks", are his ] roots. He has pointed to his boyhood home in ] as a credential. In an interview with '']'', O'Reilly's mother said that her family lived in ],<ref name="lifeoforeilly">{{cite news | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62722-2000Dec12?language=printer | work = ] | title = The Life of O'Reilly | first = Paul | last = Farhi | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref>{{dead link|date=July 2009}} which is a few miles from Levittown. Citing this interview, ], ], and others have accused O'Reilly of distorting his background to create a more working-class image. | |||
During the ], ] edition of '']'', O'Reilly dedicated the program to a discussion about a ] of ]'s wife, ], who had said at a campaign rally, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country.” O'Reilly questioned whether Mrs. Obama loved her country and, in response to a caller's comment that she did not, said "I don't want to go on a ] party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence."<ref>{{cite episode|title=The Radio Factor|series=]|airdate=2008-02-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/7325072|title=Michelle Obama Clarifies `proud' Remark}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/02/bill_oreilly_doesnt_want_to_ly.html|title=Bill O’Reilly Doesn’t Want to Lynch Michelle Obama Until He Is 100 Percent Positive She Hates America}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210008 |title=Media Matters - O'Reilly attacked as "far-left loon" caller who asked if he would apologize for "lynching party" comment |publisher=Mediamatters.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-19}}</ref> Columnist Eugene Robinson of the ''Washington Post'' criticized O'Reilly for his remarks. "There's certainly nothing at all funny or remotely appropriate about the use of a lynching reference to talk about Michelle Obama," he said. "It's -- I'm almost speechless."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/departments/syndicates/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003713919|title=Columnist Slams Bill O'Reilly's 'Lynching' Comment}}</ref> On his February 21 broadcast of ''The O'Reilly Factor'', O'Reilly said, "I'm sorry if my statement offended anybody."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210014|title=O'Reilly on his Michelle Obama remarks: "I'm sorry if my statement offended anybody" | |||
}}</ref> | |||
O'Reilly has countered that ''The Washington Post'' misquoted his mother,<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.nydailynews.com/news/col/story/185118p-160369c.html | work = ] | title = Gloves of fairness are off | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-03-04 | first = Bill | last = O'Reilly }}</ref>{{dead link|date=July 2009}} and he said his mother still lives in his childhood home, which was built by William Levitt. O'Reilly placed a copy of the house's mortgage, which shows a Levittown postal address, on his website.<ref>{{cite web |title= Form LL-65 |url= http://www.billoreilly.com/images/pdf/deed.pdf |date= |work= County Trust Company |publisher= billoreilly.com |accessdate=16 July 2009}}</ref> Levittown was redrawn into a squarish shape<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.nycroads.com/history/1960_metro-4/ | title = New York Metro Maps (1960) | publisher = nycroads.com | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> to conform with the 11756 ], which was introduced in 1963. After this time the O'Reilly home was located in ]. On a 2005 episode of '']'', Franken invited a ] historian onto the show, and she said that O'Reilly's statement about having lived in "the Westbury section of Levittown" was generally accurate and that the house could fairly be described as being in either town. She also said that O'Reilly's neighborhood was not the "hardscrabble" environment he suggested it was.<ref>The Al Franken Show, October 28, 2005.</ref> | |||
===Barney Frank=== | |||
Frank appeared on the O'Reilly Factor to respond to O'Reilly's criticism of him for the ongoing financial crisis. O'Reilly had blamed Frank and others for the crisis, said he wanted to punch him and called him a "big, fat toad."<ref>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0908/OReilly_blasts_Frank_Big_fat_toad.html</ref> When Frank began to explain his past actions regarding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, O'Reilly interrupted, began yelling at Frank, and called him a "coward." Various media critics have described O'Reilly's conduct of the interview as bullying and "unhinged."<ref>http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:7_zyKC1ahIsJ:www.advocate.com/issue_story_ektid67124.asp+the+advocate+bill+o'reilly&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us</ref> Frank responded by asking O'Reilly to stop yelling, said O'Reilly's behavior was "boorish" and that his "stupidity" prevented rational discussion of the issue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_10_04_Barney_Frank__Bill_O_Reilly_turn_nasty_in_on-air_battle/srvc=home&position=also |title=Barney Frank, Bill O’Reilly turn nasty in on-air battle - BostonHerald.com |publisher=News.bostonherald.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/03/bill-oreilly-and-barney-f_n_131569.html |title=Bill O'Reilly And Barney Frank Face-Off Over Fannie & Freddie |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> After the incident, O'Reilly suggested that his yelling at Frank was an act of political theater to make the point that Frank was a "villain."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newshounds.us/2008/10/08/bill_oreilly_suggests_barney_frank_attack_was_political_theater.php#more |title=News Hounds: Bill O'Reilly Suggests Barney Frank Attack Was Political Theater |publisher=Newshounds.us |date=Reported by Deborah - October 8, 2008 |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> | |||
O'Reilly has also said, "You don't come from any lower than I came from on an economic scale"<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.observer.com/node/52060 | work = ] | title = Fox News Superstar Bill O'Reilly Wants to Oppose Hillary in 2006! | first = Jason | last = Gay | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-06-19 }}</ref> and that his father "never earned more than $35,000 a year in his life." ] has calculated that adjusted for ], $35,000 in 1978 would be worth over $90,000 in 2001 dollars.<ref name="fair-oreillyness">{{cite news | url = http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1070 | title = Bill O'Reilly's Sheer O'Reillyness | first = Seth | last = Ackerman | coauthors = Peter Hart | work = Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting | accessdate = 2007-03-04 }}</ref> O'Reilly has retorted that his father's $35,000 income only came at the end of his long career, at which point O'Reilly would have been long independent of his parents.<ref>* {{cite book | first=Bill | last=O'Reilly | authorlink=Bill O'Reilly (commentator) | year=2003 | title=Who's Looking Out For You? }}</ref> | |||
===Likening Helen Thomas to a "witch"=== | |||
During coverage of President Barack Obama's first prime-time press conference, O'Reilly referred to veteran White House correspondent ] as the "old lady" and likened her to the "]."(sic) Bonnie Erbe of US News and World Report called O'Reilly's remarks "ugly, petty and hateful."<ref>http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/02/10/bill-oreilly-attacks-on-helen-thomas-are-ugly-petty-and-hateful.html</ref> The Womens Media Center called O'Reilly's comments sexist and ageist and called on him to apologize.<ref>http://womensmediacenter.com/wordpress/?p=589</ref> O'Reilly defended his remarks and said that his critics were being used by the "far left."<ref>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/11/oreilly-defends-calling-h_n_166223.html</ref> | |||
===George Tiller=== | |||
===Disputed claims involving the "War on Christmas"=== | |||
{{main|George Tiller|Assassination of George Tiller}} | |||
George Tiller, a controversial medical doctor, was shot dead on Sunday, May 31, 2009 while serving as an usher during worship services at Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita. Shortly thereafter, the New York Times pointed to O'Reilly's claims about Tiller as incitements to violence against the doctor.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/us/02blame.html?_r=2</ref> O'Reilly denied such claims, insisting that his reporting about Tiller was factual and the murder should be condemned by all.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,524344,00.html</ref> | |||
Media Matters for America has criticized what O'Reilly calls the "]." Media Matters posted several reports on their website with links to news articles from ]’s ], the '']'',<ref>{{cite news | first = Dennis B | last = Roddy | work = ] | url = http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05336/616063.stm | title = Religious stamps not outlawed after all | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-01-19 }}</ref> and the '']'',<ref>{{cite news | first = Neely | last = Tucker | work = ] | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901802.html | title = Have a Holly, Jolly Holiday | date = ] | accessdate = 2007-01-19 }}</ref> as well as one retraction by O’Reilly himself<ref>{{cite web publisher = ] | date = ] | author = S.G. | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200512210005 | title = O'Reilly admits he falsely accused Plano of banning red and green clothing}}</ref> noting that several of O'Reilly’s allegations to support his theory were either false or inaccurate.<ref>{{cite web | date = ] | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2007-01-19 | author = J.B. | url = http://mediamatters.org/items/200512130005 | title = O'Reilly falsely claimed that 'spiritual' Christmas stamps are no longer being offered }}</ref><ref name="WNEM">{{cite news | year = 2005 | publisher = WNEM TV-5 | author = S.G. | url = http://www.wnem.com/Global/story.asp?S=4235657 | title = Saginaw Township on the ''The O'Reilly Factor'' Radio Program }}</ref> {{Dead link|date=March 2009}} ] also published a December 3, 2004 exchange on O'Reilly's radio show in which O'Reilly told a Jewish caller that "if you are really offended (by Christmas celebrations in public schools), you gotta go to Israel." <ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200412070004?f=s_search |title=Media Matters - O'Reilly to Jewish caller: "[I]f you are really offended, you gotta go to Israel" |publisher=Mediamatters.org |date= |accessdate=2008-11-08}}</ref> | |||
Tiller was first discussed on '']'' on February 25, 2005. Subsequently Tiller was discussed in at least 28 episodes before his death. On the show he was sometimes described as "Tiller the Baby Killer" and host ] warned of what Tiller would face on "]".<ref>{{cite news|publisher=salon.com|date=2009-31-05|accessdate=2009-05-31|title=O'Reilly's campaign against murdered doctor|url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/05/31/tiller/}}</ref> | |||
On November 3, 2006, O'Reilly featured an exclusive segment on his ''The O'Reilly Factor'', saying that he had an "inside source" with official clinic documentation indicating that George Tiller performed late-term abortions to alleviate "temporary ]" in the pregnant woman.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227658,00.html |title=Killing Babies in America |accessdate=2006-11-07 |last=O'Reilly |first=Bill |authorlink=Bill O'Reilly (commentator)|date=2006-11-06 |work=The O'Reilly Factor Talking Points |publisher= FoxNews.com }}</ref> Tiller responded to O'Reilly's statements by demanding an investigation into the "inside source" through which the information was leaked, suggesting that ], then the Kansas Attorney General, was responsible. Kline subsequently denied the charge. | |||
O'Reilly denied that his criticism of Tiller incited the violence, defending his coverage saying "every single thing we said about Tiller was true, and my analysis was based on those facts". O'Reilly also denounced the action saying "clear-thinking Americans should condemn" the killing. | |||
Civil rights activist ] said that speech such as O'Reilly's does not legally qualify as ] and that calling it incitement rather than political speech diminishes "the ability to speak vigorously".<ref name="KAKEMay31">{{cite news | title= Abortion Doctor George Tiller Killed | url= http://www.kake.com/home/headlines/46575872.html | date= 2009-05-31| publisher= Gray Television, Inc| accessdate=2009-05-31 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=|first=|title=Source: Abortion doc Tiller gunned down at church |url=http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/6450904.html|work=]|date=2009-05-31|accessdate=2009-05-31}}</ref> | |||
<ref>http://www.leader-vindicator.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20329201&BRD=2758&PAG=461&dept_id=572980&rfi=6</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 183: | Line 95: | ||
{{Bill O'Reilly}} | {{Bill O'Reilly}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Oreilly, Bill}} | |||
{{blpwatch|from=05/2008|reason=Controversial media figure.}} | |||
] | ] |
Revision as of 04:10, 30 July 2009
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "Public image of Bill O'Reilly" political commentator – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FCriticism+of+Bill+O%26%2339%3BReilly+%28political+commentator%29+%283rd+nomination%29%5D%5DAFD |
Over the years, there have been several issues highlighted in American political commentator Bill O'Reilly's print and broadcast work. He has drawn criticism from several individuals and groups, which include media personalities such as Al Franken, Bill Moyers, David Letterman, Bill Maher, and Keith Olbermann. He has also been criticized by progressive media watchdog groups such as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Free Press, and Media Matters for America.
Analysis of Bill O'Reilly and his methods
Indiana University study
In early 2007, researchers from the Indiana University School of Journalism published a report in the academic journal Journalism Studies that analyzed the Talking Points Memo segment. Using analysis techniques developed in the 1930s by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis, the researchers compared O'Reilly's comments and style to a 1939 study of Father Charles Coughlin. The study found that O'Reilly used propaganda far more often than Coughlin, was three times more likely to engage in name calling, and consistently cast non-Americans as threats and never in the role of victim or hero."
O'Reilly criticized the study, asserting that "the terms 'conservative,' 'liberal,' 'left,' 'right,' 'progressive,' 'traditional' and 'centrist' were considered name-calling if they were associated with a problem or social ill." The study's authors responded that those terms were only considered as name-calling when linked to derogatory qualifiers, for instance "Kool-Aid left". O'Reilly also claimed that Indiana University has received millions of dollars from George Soros' Open Society Institute, to which the authors responded that they had "received no funding for this study".
Fox News producer Ron Mitchell wrote an op-ed in which he accused the study's authors of seeking to manipulate their research to fit a predetermined outcome. Mitchell argued that by using tools developed for examining propaganda, the researchers presupposed that O'Reilly propagandized.
Marvin Kitman and his O'Reilly biography
In January 2007, St. Martin's Press released the biography The Man Who Would Not Shut Up: The Rise of Bill O'Reilly, written by longtime Newsday TV critic Marvin Kitman. O'Reilly initially cooperated with the author by giving him 29 interviews. According to Kitman, O'Reilly was going to help promote and publicize the book until, just prior to publication, they had a disagreement over the inclusion of a chapter covering Andrea Mackris' 2004 sexual harassment lawsuit against O'Reilly. After the book came out with the chapter included, Kitman asserted that O'Reilly attempted to bury it by "intimidating" and "terrorizing" Fox News prime time shows to keep them from inviting Kitman.
In an interview with Keith Olbermann, Kitman criticized O'Reilly as "kind of a hypocrite" by pointing out O'Reilly's belief that journalists should not attempt to flatter or indulge the people they cover. Kitman also said he found it strange that O'Reilly sought to suppress the book when it cast him in a generally favorable light. Kitman said, "This is the only book that‘s ever said anything positive about Bill, except for the six he wrote about himself." Several critics agree that the book's portrayal is fair.
FAIR's Peter Hart
Peter Hart, a media analyst for the progressive Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, co-authored The Oh Really Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly. In the 2004 documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism, Hart states that The O'Reilly Factor is a "perfect example" of what is wrong with Fox News, alleging that the Republican Party gets favored treatment over the Democratic Party on O'Reilly's show, as well as the network in general.
Factual inaccuracy and selective edits
Critics of O'Reilly allege that he misleads his audience by presenting false information and also engages in misleading and selective editing. For example, he featured a story about a "national epidemic" of teenage lesbian gangs who carry pink pistols and try to indoctrinate young girls into lesbianism. When confronted on the story by civil rights groups, O'Reilly later admitted it was overhyped but defended its validity. Furthermore, critics such as Media Matters claims that O'Reilly misleads his audience when he described his upbringing and that he overstates his influence such as when he pointed to a non-existent publication to support his claim that his call for a boycott of French goods cost the French billions of dollars.
On June 24, 2004, law professor David D. Cole told Al Franken on Air America Radio about an alleged incident that occurred while he appeared on the June 21 edition of O'Reilly's show. Cole claimed that as the episode's Talking Points Memo segment was being taped, O'Reilly told his producers to re-record the segment in order to prevent the airing of footage showing former New Jersey governor and 9/11 Commission chairman Thomas Kean confirming no evidence had been found suggesting a link between Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist network. Cole alleged that O'Reilly then claimed Kean had confirmed a link between the two groups, without playing the footage. Cole also said that when he directly challenged O'Reilly's deception, O'Reilly went "berserk", calling his guest a "SOB", and "said I would never, ever be invited to be on the show again." Cole said that when the interview was broadcast that night, the portion of the interview showing Cole's confrontation and O'Reilly's subsequent outburst was edited out by Fox News producers.
Franken also criticized O'Reilly for alleged selective and misleading editing in an interview of Senator Joseph Biden by George Stephanopoulos. In the interview Biden proposed the submission of legislation for an independent commission to look into wrongdoing in the U.S. Army's prison system at Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. When O'Reilly analyzed the same interview on The Factor, the broadcast edited out all references Biden made to appointing an independent commission and only presented Biden's call to shut down Guantanamo Bay. O'Reilly accused Biden of misusing the prison abuse story and then presented the missing part of Biden's remarks as his own opinion: "The Bush administration should set up an independent commission to investigate American detainee policy across the board. The president must take the offensive on this, or else the country's image will continue to suffer and the jihadists and their enablers will win another victory."
O'Reilly has also been criticized for his interview style such as when he and Congressman Barney Frank got into a very heated argument during a discussion of the ongoing financial crisis, and when he cut off the microphone of anti-war protester Jeremy Glick. Furthermore, he has also been criticized for being insensitive to certain victims and groups. An example of this was Shawn Hornbeck whom O'Reilly inferred that there was an element that he liked about this circumstances. He also received criticism for comments that were taken to mean that San Francisco should not receive government protection from Al Qaeda after the city passed a ballot measure that declared the city's opposition to "the federal government's use of public schools to recruit students for service in the military."
Critics and rivals
O'Reilly has been involved in numerous controversies and rivalries with various people and organizations. Some of the more notable are Al Franken, George Soros, Bill Moyers of PBS and Keith Olbermann.
Media Matters for America
Media Matters for America describes itself as a politically progressive, web-based, non-profit organization that reports and criticizes what it describes as "conservative misinformation in the U.S. media." O'Reilly is often the subject of Media Matters' online reports.
O'Reilly has referred to Media Matters as "smear merchants," and "the most vile, despicable human beings on the planet," and has expressed distaste for the site he claims is funded by George Soros. Media Matters maintains that it has never received funding from Soros "either directly or through another organization."
Al Franken
Al Franken's 2003 book Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look At the Right included a picture of O'Reilly on the cover and a chapter devoted to him inside. In his book, Franken accused O'Reilly of distorting facts both to serve conservative politics and to improve his public image.
Keith Olbermann
See also: Countdown with Keith Olbermann § Olbermann vs. O'ReillyOlbermann's show Countdown on MSNBC, which airs opposite The O'Reilly Factor, is highly critical of O'Reilly. Olbermann frequently names O'Reilly in the "Worst Persons in the World" segment of the program.
Notable controversies
Bill O'Reilly has been involved in several controversies throughout the years.
American Red Cross and the United Way
After the September 11 terrorist attacks, O'Reilly devoted substantial time on his television show and wrote pieces accusing the United Way of America and American Red Cross of failing to deliver millions of dollars in donated money, raised by the organizations in the name of the disaster, to the families of those killed in the attacks. O'Reilly claimed that the organizations misrepresented their intentions for the money being raised by not distributing all of the 9/11 relief fund to the victims. Actor George Clooney responded to O'Reilly's claims, accusing O'Reilly of misstating facts (including confusing the United Way with the Red Cross), sloppy reporting and harming the relief effort by inciting "panic" among potential donors. Congressional hearings were called on the matter and an investigation by New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer took place. Bernadette Healey, the president of the Red Cross, resigned shortly thereafter. In a statement before the House Ways and Means Committee in November 2001, Congressman J.D. Hayworth asserted that media pressure, most notably from O'Reilly, helped cause the Red Cross to increase payments to affected people and helped cause other charities to participate in an oversight database established by Spitzer.
Harlem restaurant comments
On the September 19, 2007 edition of The Radio Factor, prior to having a discussion about racial stereotypes with fellow Fox News commentator and author Juan Williams, O'Reilly mentioned a lunch he had with Rev. Al Sharpton at Sylvia's restaurant in Harlem. Before Williams joined the discussion, he said that he "couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship." Later on the show, while discussing how white America feels that gangsta rappers dominate black culture, Williams stated, "Oh, and it’s just so awful. It’s just so awful because, I mean, it’s literally the sewer come to the surface, and now people take it that the sewer is the whole story", to which O'Reilly responded, "That’s right. That’s right. There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea'".
O'Reilly also said, "I think that black Americans are starting to think more and more for themselves, getting away from the Sharptons and the Jacksons and people trying to lead them into a race-based culture. They're just trying to figure it out. 'Look, I can make it. If I work hard and get educated, I can make it.'" Roland S. Martin of CNN said that the notion that black people are just now starting to value education is "ridiculous" and that the notion that black people let Sharpton or Jackson think for them is "nuts". He suggested that O'Reilly's view was "based upon a stereotype" and called on O'Reilly and others who think like him to "wake up".
Karl Frisch, spokesman for Media Matters, said O'Reilly's comments were "ignorant and racially charged." O'Reilly responded in his Talking Points Memo that he believed that Media Matters took him out of context. He defended his comments by saying, "It was an attempt to tell the radio audience that there is no difference black, white, we’re all Americans. The stereotypes they see on television are not true." O'Reilly said, "Media Matters distorted the entire conversation and implied I was racist for condemning racism."
Juan Williams said the criticism of O'Reilly was “rank dishonesty” and that the original comments "had nothing to do with racist ranting by anybody except by these idiots at CNN." Williams went on to say it was "frustrating" that the media try to criticize anyone who wanted to have an honest discussion about race.
On the Today show, host Matt Lauer said, "I thought Bill O'Reilly was saying that we should not be surprised." He said O'Reilly's point is that "the small group of people" who think that certain rappers represent all African Americans "need to get out and live life a little bit". Lauer later speculated that O'Reilly would want to get "a do-over" and phrase his comments differently.
Following the controversy, Jesse Jackson made his first appearance on the O'Reilly Factor. Jackson asked O'Reilly what he had intended by his comments and said that "to underestimate the civility of black people was offensive" but that the controversy over O'Reilly's remarks had obscured other, more important issues.
Controversy about O'Reilly's childhood home and upbringing
O'Reilly has long said that his inspiration for speaking up for average Americans, or what he calls "the folks", are his working-class roots. He has pointed to his boyhood home in Levittown, New York as a credential. In an interview with The Washington Post, O'Reilly's mother said that her family lived in Westbury, which is a few miles from Levittown. Citing this interview, Al Franken, Michael Kinsley, and others have accused O'Reilly of distorting his background to create a more working-class image.
O'Reilly has countered that The Washington Post misquoted his mother, and he said his mother still lives in his childhood home, which was built by William Levitt. O'Reilly placed a copy of the house's mortgage, which shows a Levittown postal address, on his website. Levittown was redrawn into a squarish shape to conform with the 11756 ZIP code, which was introduced in 1963. After this time the O'Reilly home was located in Westbury. On a 2005 episode of The Al Franken Show, Franken invited a Long Island historian onto the show, and she said that O'Reilly's statement about having lived in "the Westbury section of Levittown" was generally accurate and that the house could fairly be described as being in either town. She also said that O'Reilly's neighborhood was not the "hardscrabble" environment he suggested it was.
O'Reilly has also said, "You don't come from any lower than I came from on an economic scale" and that his father "never earned more than $35,000 a year in his life." Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has calculated that adjusted for inflation, $35,000 in 1978 would be worth over $90,000 in 2001 dollars. O'Reilly has retorted that his father's $35,000 income only came at the end of his long career, at which point O'Reilly would have been long independent of his parents.
George Tiller
Main articles: George Tiller and Assassination of George TillerGeorge Tiller, a controversial medical doctor, was shot dead on Sunday, May 31, 2009 while serving as an usher during worship services at Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita. Shortly thereafter, the New York Times pointed to O'Reilly's claims about Tiller as incitements to violence against the doctor. O'Reilly denied such claims, insisting that his reporting about Tiller was factual and the murder should be condemned by all.
Tiller was first discussed on The O'Reilly Factor on February 25, 2005. Subsequently Tiller was discussed in at least 28 episodes before his death. On the show he was sometimes described as "Tiller the Baby Killer" and host Bill O'Reilly warned of what Tiller would face on "judgment day".
On November 3, 2006, O'Reilly featured an exclusive segment on his The O'Reilly Factor, saying that he had an "inside source" with official clinic documentation indicating that George Tiller performed late-term abortions to alleviate "temporary depression" in the pregnant woman. Tiller responded to O'Reilly's statements by demanding an investigation into the "inside source" through which the information was leaked, suggesting that Phill Kline, then the Kansas Attorney General, was responsible. Kline subsequently denied the charge.
O'Reilly denied that his criticism of Tiller incited the violence, defending his coverage saying "every single thing we said about Tiller was true, and my analysis was based on those facts". O'Reilly also denounced the action saying "clear-thinking Americans should condemn" the killing.
Civil rights activist Burt Neuborne said that speech such as O'Reilly's does not legally qualify as incitement and that calling it incitement rather than political speech diminishes "the ability to speak vigorously".
References
- Silver, J. "Bill O'Reilly Thinks You're Crazy". Free Press. Retrieved 2008-08-28.
- Indiana University. "Content analysis of O'Reilly's Rhetoric find spin to be a 'factor'".
- Mike Conway, Maria Elizabeth Grabe, and Kevin Grieves, "Villains, Victims, and the Virtuous in Bill O'Reilly's 'No-Spin Zone'," Journalism Studies 8:2 (2007).
- ^ Mike Conway, Maria Elizabeth Grabe and Kevin Grieves, Los Angeles Times, Bill O'Reilly and Krippendorff's Alpha, May 16, 2007. Retrieved May 18, 2007.
- O'Reilly B, "Calling People Names", Foxnews.com, May 4, 2007. Accessed May 10, 2007.
- Mitchell R, "Stop Calling O'Reilly Names", LATimes.com (Opinion), May 10, 2007, Accessed May 10, 2007.
- Lovece, Frank (2007-01-18). "O'Reilly bio may surprise fans and foes". Newsday.com. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)Accessed via Google cache - ^ "'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for March 1 - Countdown with Keith Olbermann - MSNBC.com". MSNBC. 2007-03-02. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "Social Sciences - 12/15/2006 - Library Journal". Libraryjournal.com. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "Nonfiction Reviews: Week of 11/6/2006 - 11/6/2006 - Publishers Weekly". Publisher Weekly. 2006-11-06. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "The Oh Really? Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly". Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Retrieved 2008-05-20.
- "Outfoxed - transcript pgs 49-50" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-05-05.
- "GLAAD: Update: Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor Offers Unsubstantiated Claims in "Lesbian Gang Epidemic" Segment". Glaad.org. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "SPLCenter.org: O'Reilly and lesbian gangs". Splcenter.org. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "Gay Gun Advocates Draw Bead on O'Reilly," Congressional Quarterly (16 July 2007).
- Raphael (2005-10-27). "O'Reilly again trumpeted "annoying" French boycott". Media Matters for America. Retrieved 2005-12-27.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - G.W. (2004-07-07). "O'Reilly defended old lies exposed by Jack Mathews and MMFA, told new ones". Media Matters for America. Retrieved 2007-01-19.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - G.W. (2004-04-28). "FOX's O'Reilly fabricated evidence of success of purported boycott". Media Matters for America.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - On O'Franken Factor, O'Reilly guest shared a "story about how O'Reilly distorts and lies"; O'Reilly called guest "SOB" off-air, Media Matters for America, 30 June, 2004
- "GOP Woes Lead to Finger-Pointing; Bin Laden Resurfaces in Attack Ads". Air America Radio. 2005. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
- "Franken vs. O'Reilly". 2005-05-24. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:7_zyKC1ahIsJ:www.advocate.com/issue_story_ektid67124.asp+the+advocate+bill+o'reilly&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us
- "Barney Frank, Bill O’Reilly turn nasty in on-air battle - BostonHerald.com". News.bostonherald.com. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
- "Bill O'Reilly And Barney Frank Face-Off Over Fannie & Freddie". Huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
- Jack Shafer, Slate.com, Bill O'Reilly Wants You To Shut Up, Aug. 28, 2003. Retrieved October 20, 2007.
- John Colapinto, Rolling Stone, Mad Dog, Aug. 11, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2007.
- Christina Boyle, "O'Reilly Takes Hit for Kid-Liked-It Comment," New York Daily News (19 January 2007) p. 23.
- San Francisco Department of Elections (2005). "No Military Recruiters in Public Schools, Scholarships for Education and Job Training". San Francisco Department of Elections. Retrieved 2005-12-27.
- "Our Mission: Who We Are". Media Matters for America. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
- "Unresolved Problem: Political Smear Sites". 2005-10-05. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - O'Reilly purported to chart an intricate web leading to "vile propaganda outfit" Media Matters
- "Fight the power", Bill O'Reilly, WorldNetDaily, December 13, 2001
- "Red Cross Diverts Donations From Sept. 11 Victims", Kevin Curran, NewsMax.com, October 31, 2001
- Sharon Cotliar and Stephen M. Silverman (November 7, 2008). "George Clooney Bites Back at Bill O'Reilly - Asia Quake 2004, Bill O'Reilly, George Clooney : People.com". People.com. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
- "Red Cross President Resigns Under Pressure From Board", Grant Williams, Philanthropy.com, October 26, 2001
- Opening Statement of the Hon. J.D. Hayworth, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Committee on Ways and Means, Hearing on Response by Charitable Organizations to the Recent Terrorist Attacks, Committee on Ways & Means, November 8, 2001
- Audio broadcast of Radio Factor 9/19/2007
- Transcript of Radio Factor with Juan Williams
- ^ FOXNews.com - Bill O'Reilly Says He's Being Smeared - Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Arts And Entertainment
- Harlem dinner comments
- "Media Matters - CNN's Roland Martin on O'Reilly comment: "[L]ast I checked, I didn't hand over my brain to Rev. Sharpton"". Mediamatters.org. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "CNN.com - Transcripts". Transcripts.cnn.com. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- "FOXNews.com - CNN Goes Over to the Dark Side - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor". Foxnews.com. September 26, 2007. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- Today show, NBC, September 26, 2007.
- "Media Matters - Rev. Jackson to O'Reilly: "[T]o underestimate the civility of blacks was insulting to many people"". Mediamatters.org. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
- Farhi, Paul (2000-12-13). "The Life of O'Reilly". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - O'Reilly, Bill (2004-04-18). "Gloves of fairness are off". New York Daily News. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - "Form LL-65" (PDF). County Trust Company. billoreilly.com. Retrieved 16 July 2009.
- "New York Metro Maps (1960)". nycroads.com. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
- The Al Franken Show, October 28, 2005.
- Gay, Jason (2000-10-09). "Fox News Superstar Bill O'Reilly Wants to Oppose Hillary in 2006!". The New York Observer. Retrieved 2007-06-19.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Ackerman, Seth. "Bill O'Reilly's Sheer O'Reillyness". Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - * O'Reilly, Bill (2003). Who's Looking Out For You?.
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/us/02blame.html?_r=2
- http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,524344,00.html
- "O'Reilly's campaign against murdered doctor". salon.com. 2009-31-05. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - O'Reilly, Bill (2006-11-06). "Killing Babies in America". The O'Reilly Factor Talking Points. FoxNews.com. Retrieved 2006-11-07.
- "Abortion Doctor George Tiller Killed". Gray Television, Inc. 2009-05-31. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
- "Source: Abortion doc Tiller gunned down at church". Associated Press. 2009-05-31. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
- http://www.leader-vindicator.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20329201&BRD=2758&PAG=461&dept_id=572980&rfi=6
Bill O'Reilly | |
---|---|
General | |
Shows | |
Books | |
Debate |