| Revision as of 17:25, 26 February 2007 editFlameviper (talk | contribs)2,325 edits Yay!← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009 edit undoSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits AfD nomination of Five themes of geography. using TW | ||
| (85 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{User talk:Flameviper/header}} | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Informal checkuser== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ''÷]'' 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Can you explain, exactly, what the intent of ] is? It just appears to be some hypothesized thing you've come up with. To claim that it will result in an RfC or de-sysopping is purely your own speculation. ] 17:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It violates ] and negates the need for ]. Any sysop isn't supposed to be able to use checkuser. Why do you think that checkuser, as a user right, is so exclusive? And on a side note, '''I''' will file the RfC myself and request de-sysopping. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 17:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Flameviper, I deleted ]. Please don't make up policies and throw them into the WP namespace. If you've got an issue with the way Checkuser is carried out, then discuss it on the ]. ] <sup><small><font color="DarkBlue">]</font></small></sup> 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You that the block of User:Squeamish Editor had resulted in your IP being autoblocked and you gave the IP number. That meant that anyone reading that would know you were editing from that IP. There was no use of Checkuser or even any Administrator function involved. It's just a coincidence that one of the people involved is a Checkuser. No one did anything wrong and there's nothing to complain about. If you don't want your IP to be available, I'm sure if you ask nicely someone will delete the edit with your IP number from the history of your archive page. ] 17:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I know that. But in the future, supposing someone wanted to get my IP address, the damage would already have been done. My IP address would be sitting on a Post-It somewhere in a sysop's basement, just waiting for the day it can be unleashed as ]. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 18:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::If you know that, then why are you talking about RfC's and desysoppings? Do you have a serious point to make here? ] 18:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I'm just saying that people get their IP addresses revealed daily in the form of autoblocks. It doesn't take a <s>rocket scientist</s>] to figure out how to utilize that for evil. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 18:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Users in that situation can post "I need an autoblock listed, can an admin who's online now please let me know so I can e-mail him or her" and then the user will have given the IP information to just one admin rather than anyone who reads the page. So to that extent, your point is a fair one. But making accusations that people have acted improperly, or that people are going to act improperly in the future, is unproductive. Please stop that, it's not helping your mood or the encyclopedia. ] 18:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Dare I say that this is now boring me and I wish it to end? ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 18:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Be warned, this is just another disruptive action on your part. A lot of people are monitoring you closely now, I'm sure. If you continue any disruption, I'm pretty sure you'll be looking at block sometime soon, ] 18:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == BWAAARARRRGH == | |||
| Stop leaving me messages! ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 18:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Flameviper, you're the one drawing attention to yourself with your edit summaries and generally disruptive activity. If you'd like to talk about other matters, such as building an encyclopedia, then just start acting like you're here to contribute. ] <sup><small><font color="DarkBlue">]</font></small></sup> 18:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm not doing anything. You won't neeve me anone! | |||
| == Mentoring == | |||
| Flameviper, would you be willing to work with a mentor? A mentor would help you focus your Misplaced Pages contributions and as a bonus, keep me and others out of your hair. What do you think? ] <sup><small><font color="DarkBlue">]</font></small></sup> 18:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That would be shweet. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 18:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Would you like me to help you with your wikipedia editing? I hope I can give you ome good advice and help you with problems you may have with other editors. ]<sup>See ] or ]</sup> 19:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmm... I'm not actively editing this moment, I'm going to cruise through some juicy backlogs and gawk at the missing users. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 19:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::To be honest with you I think it would be a good idea, you have the potential to b a very good editor. Its just that some lapses in your temprement have put you at odds with quite a few other editors. If you allow me to, I will help you on your style in talkpage conversations and also help defend your point. I will also look at your contributions and look at ways you could improve ]<sup>See ] or ]</sup> 19:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks! ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 19:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| For your continuous disruption, you have been blocked for 1 month. You've had this coming and with its threats sealed the deal. ] 20:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Feh == | |||
| <center>I've decided to</center> | |||
| <center><big><big><big>'''LEAVE WIKIPEDIA'''</big></big></big></center> | |||
| <center><small><small><small>for one month</small></small></small></center> | |||
| <center>:P</center> | |||
| <center>~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>'''</center> | |||
| <center>20:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)</center> | |||
| * Wrong. You're blocked. Get over it, move on. --]<small> (]) (])</small> 20:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == HUNGY MAN sockpuppet == | |||
| Yet ''another'' sockpuppet, Flameviper? Haven't you learned anything from Son of a Peach, Flameviper in exlie, Flameviper12 etc.? You may not use sockpuppet accounts to evade a block. You cannot edit Misplaced Pages during your block. Your sockpuppet account has been indef blocked, and your 1 month block has been reset and starts again now. You realize this behavior guarantees you will never pass an RfA? You are now on the brink of exhausting the community's patience and being indefinitely blocked. Please do not return to Misplaced Pages until your block on this account expires. 12:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Because of your glaring past and unrepentant attitude, I've indefinitely blocked this account. ] 19:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == An article which you started, or significantly expanded, '']'', was selected for ]! == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> | |||
| Thanks for your contributions! ''']]''' 20:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration request == | |||
| If you need to comment further on your arbitration request, post your comments here and a clerk will copy them to the arbitration page. ] 15:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you very much! I am forever grateful! ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 17:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009
Redirect to:
Articles for deletion nomination of Five themes of geography
I have nominated Five themes of geography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Five themes of geography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ÷seresin 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)