Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flameviper: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:48, 13 June 2007 editFlameviper (talk | contribs)2,325 edits ATTENTION CALLED FROM ALL ADMINISTRATORS!← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009 edit undoSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits AfD nomination of Five themes of geography. using TW 
(43 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{unblock reviewed|1=What just happened? I just got unbanned yesterday, and now I'm banned again, and Jpgordon is saying that I'm Two-Sixteen. There was no checkuser or anything!|decline=actually there was a checkuser; {{user|Jpgordon}} has checkuser access and flagged Two-Sixteen as your sockpuppet. Sockpuppeting at the discussion of lifting the ban on your main account despite your history of sockpuppetry? Not such a good idea Flameviper. It's a pity too because it appeared that the community was willing to give you one more chance. — ] 14:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)}}


==] nomination of ]==
Can someone tell me what's going on here? One minute, everything's peachy, and the next, I'm perma-banned again.
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ''÷]'' 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't even want to edit anything, I just wanted to tell everyone I was leaving, put a message on my user/talk pages, and be gone.

This is utter madness.

Someone, an admin or something, put this on your watchlist, I'd like to have an actual conversation...

~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 14:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

:Okay...fine. I did it. I made a sockpuppet.
:But is there really any harm in it?
:I was Two-Sixteen. I tried to keep as low a profile as I could.
:My plan was to never reveal anything about Flameviper. In fact, I never wanted this account to be unblocked. I was going to edit constructively, be nice and eventually nominate myself for adminship.
:Once I was a sysop, I would do normal administrator tasks for a while, to show that I was for real.
:Then, finally, I would reveal that I was Flameviper. When that happened, everyone would see that I could do something worthwhile, and that I wasn't just a banned user.
:But a hitch developed in my plan! Flameviper was unblocked!
:I intended to simply leave Misplaced Pages with the Flameviper account (as was the original intent) and proceed editing constructively with Two-Sixteen.
:I couldn't foul this one up. It was my last chance!
:But with my new, familiar account came a complacency of mind, one which I cannot forgive myself for. I started making larger and larger errors in my separation of the two accounts... and that was the end...

:But the real question is whether it matters. Who cares if I am Two-Sixteen? I don't. I was making good edits! Didn't you see? But the techincalities of the situation are like snares and twisting cords. They swallowed me in my entirety.
:Why should it be that it's happy happy fun time when I never did anything? Why should my treatment as Two-Sixteen have differed from my treatment as Flameviper?
:That difference in treatment, my friends, is why I was banned.
:I never did anything that was outright evil. I never made personal attacks, I didn't vandalise anything, I didn't violate 3RR or any of the other infinite rules.
:All I did was say something to Elaragirl. On her talk page.
:At the top of her talk page, IN BRIGHT RED LETTERS NO LESS, was a notice from Elaragirl that basically stated that on her talk page, one could be less constrained than normally.
:So I went ahead and spoke my mind. I told her that we were either going to get along or not get along, basically. And that's what I meant. It wasn't intended to be a "personal attack" and both of us acknowledged that. I e-mailed her later on and apoligized for being rude, and she basically told be that it was no big deal and that she didn't mind.
:But it doesn't matter whether I actually violated a rule or not. Metros, who had been riding my ass for the last month or so, seized the opportunity to attack me for the "violation of policy". Techincally, it was a violation of policy, but it wasn't really; the same way that lending someone your money isn't the same as being robbed.
:If Metros hadn't been riding my ass for the month previous to that, I never would have been banned. It's as simple as that; when you try to find fault in someone, you will do so.

:So after a few months of silent reflection that I had imposed upon myself, I decided to start again. I had tried to contact the administrators through every other avenue; my talk page, e-mail, the mailing list, everything. My talk page was locked for "unblock abuse" even though I was just trying to have a conversation. My e-mails to administrators were ignored. The mailing list was of no help whatsoever.
:I had no choice but to create a sockpuppet.
<center>'''You caused this through your own ignoring of my attempts to contact you.'''</center>

~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 14:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009

Redirect to:

Articles for deletion nomination of Five themes of geography

I have nominated Five themes of geography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Five themes of geography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ÷seresin 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)