| Revision as of 14:53, 13 June 2007 editOnly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,384 edits declined← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009 edit undoSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits AfD nomination of Five themes of geography. using TW | ||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to...|reason=*Looks up ]*...are sockpuppets allowed by users who are avoiding a block placed upon their main account? Oh look, ]. ] 14:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| I never made an "abusive sockpuppet". Two-Sixteen never would have been banned if you thought he was a different person than me. It may as well have been another person. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ''÷]'' 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Why should my treatment as Two-Sixteen have differed from my treatment as Flameviper? | |||
| :That difference in treatment, my friends, is why I was banned. | |||
| :I never did anything that was outright evil. I never made personal attacks, I didn't vandalise anything, I didn't violate 3RR or any of the other infinite rules. | |||
| :All I did was say something to Elaragirl. On her talk page. | |||
| :At the top of her talk page, IN BRIGHT RED LETTERS NO LESS, was a notice from Elaragirl that basically stated that on her talk page, one could be less constrained than normally. | |||
| :So I went ahead and spoke my mind. I told her that we were either going to get along or not get along, basically. And that's what I meant. It wasn't intended to be a "personal attack" and both of us acknowledged that. I e-mailed her later on and apoligized for being rude, and she basically told be that it was no big deal and that she didn't mind. | |||
| :But it doesn't matter whether I actually violated a rule or not. Metros, who had been riding my ass for the last month or so, seized the opportunity to attack me for the "violation of policy". Techincally, it was a violation of policy, but it wasn't really; the same way that lending someone your money isn't the same as being robbed. | |||
| :If Metros hadn't been riding my ass for the month previous to that, I never would have been banned. It's as simple as that; when you try to find fault in someone, you will do so. | |||
| :So after a few months of silent reflection that I had imposed upon myself, I decided to start again. I had tried to contact the administrators through every other avenue; my talk page, e-mail, the mailing list, everything. My talk page was locked for "unblock abuse" even though I was just trying to have a conversation. My e-mails to administrators were ignored. The mailing list was of no help whatsoever. | |||
| :I had no choice but to create a sockpuppet. | |||
| <center>'''You caused this through your own ignoring of my attempts to contact you.'''</center> | |||
| ~ '''<font color="CC0000">]</font><font color="009900">]</font><font color="00CC00">]</font><font color="009900">]</font>''' 14:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:16, 7 August 2009
Redirect to:
Articles for deletion nomination of Five themes of geography
I have nominated Five themes of geography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Five themes of geography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ÷seresin 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)