Misplaced Pages

Copper Scroll: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:08, 26 August 2009 editCoralapus (talk | contribs)403 edits Claims: restored a ref to 2 Maccabees← Previous edit Revision as of 12:30, 26 August 2009 edit undoCoralapus (talk | contribs)403 edits removed fictional "Silver Scroll" from non-fiction section; added scholarly opinions that had been neglectedNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Original research|date=June 2008}} {{Original research|date=June 2008}}
<!---Please do not enter anything new in here without a reference (footnote) from a scholarly source, which excludes the History Channel!--> <!---Please do not enter anything new in here without a reference (footnote) from a scholarly source, which excludes the History Channel!-->
The '''Copper Scroll''' (]) is one of the ] found in cave 3 near Khirbet ], but differs significantly from the others. Whereas most of the other scrolls are written on ] and a few on ], this scroll is written on ]: ] mixed with about 1% ]. Unlike the others, it is not a ] work, but a list of locations at which various items of ] and ] are buried or hidden. It differs from the other scrolls in its Hebrew (closer to the language of the ] than to the literary Hebrew of the other scrolls), its orthography (i.e., its spelling), ] (forms of letters), and date (c.50-100 CE).<ref></ref> It is currently on display at the Archaeological Museum in ]. The '''Copper Scroll''' (]) is one of the ] found in Cave 3 near Khirbet ], but differs significantly from the others. Whereas the other scrolls are written on ] or ], this scroll is written on ]: ] mixed with about 1% ]. Unlike the others, it is not a ] work, but a list of locations at which various items of ] and ] are buried or hidden. It differs from the other scrolls in its Hebrew (closer to the language of the ] than to the literary Hebrew of the other scrolls, though 4QMMT shares some language characteristics), its orthography (i.e., its spelling), ] (forms of letters), and date (c.50-100 CE, possibly overlapping the latest of the other Qumran manuscripts).<ref></ref> It is currently on display at the Archaeological Museum in ].


==History and origin== ==History and origin==
Line 10: Line 10:


==Writing style== ==Writing style==
The style of writing is unusual, different from the other scrolls. It is written in a style similar to ] ]. There is an unusual ], and the script has the features resulting from someone writing on copper with a ]. There is also the anomaly that seven of the names of locations are followed by a group of two or three ]. The text is a listing of sixty-four locations; sixty-three of which are treasures of gold and silver, which have been estimated in the tons. The final listing points to a duplicate document with additional details. Some scholars believe that this document could be the Silver Scroll - a scroll which archaeologists are still searching for in the ]i desert. The style of writing is unusual, different from the other scrolls. It is written in a style similar to ] ]. There is an unusual ], and the script has the features resulting from someone writing on copper with a ]. There is also the anomaly that seven of the names of locations are followed by a group of two or three ]. The text is a listing of sixty-four locations; sixty-three of which are treasures of gold and silver, which have been estimated in the tons. The final listing points to a duplicate document with additional details. That other document has not been found.


Some scholars believe that the text was perhaps copied from another original document by an illiterate scribe who did not speak the language in which the scroll was written. Perhaps this was done so that the secrecy of the content of the text would be preserved. This scribe is believed to have made a total of about thirty errors or mistakes in the copying of the text, mistakes that someone familiar with the original language would possibly not have made. Some scholars believe that the difficult to decipher text was perhaps copied from another original document by an illiterate scribe who did not speak the language in which the scroll was written. Perhaps this was done so that the secrecy of the content of the text would be preserved. This scribe made several errors, mistakes that someone familiar with the original language might not have made.


There is a distinctly minority view that the ] might have contained one of the listed treasures <ref></ref>, and if the artifacts from this location may have been recovered. Although the scroll was made of alloyed copper in order to last, the locations are written as if the reader would have an intimate knowledge of obscure references &mdash; e.g., "In the irrigation cistern(?) of the Shaveh, in the outlet that is in it, buried at eleven cubits: 70 talents of silver" (from Allegro's translation), or "In the cave that is next to the fountain belonging to the House of ], dig six cubits. (There are) six bars of gold".<ref></ref>
The listings are a challenge to decipher.

There is a distinctly minority view that the ] might have contained one of the listed treasures <ref></ref>, and if the artifacts from this location may have been recovered. Although the scroll was obviously made of alloyed copper in order to last, the locations are written as if the reader would have an intimate knowledge of obscure references &mdash; e.g., "In the irrigation cistern(?) of the Shaveh, in the outlet that is in it, buried at eleven cubits: 70 talents of silver" (from Allegro's translation), or "In the cave that is next to the fountain belonging to the House of ], dig six cubits. (There are) six bars of gold".<ref></ref>


==Translation== ==Translation==
Line 32: Line 30:


The theories of the origin of the treasure were broken down by ]<ref>{{cite book|author=]|title=The Dead Sea Scriptures|publisher=] Inc |year=1976|isbn=0-8446-6702-1}}<!---http://www.directtextbook.com/prices/0844667021 says Peter Smith---></ref>: The theories of the origin of the treasure were broken down by ]<ref>{{cite book|author=]|title=The Dead Sea Scriptures|publisher=] Inc |year=1976|isbn=0-8446-6702-1}}<!---http://www.directtextbook.com/prices/0844667021 says Peter Smith---></ref>:
*First, the treasure could be that of the Qumran community. The difficulty here is that the community is assumed to be an ] brotherhood, with which vast treasures are difficult to reconcile. *First, the treasure could be that of the Qumran community. The difficulty here is that the community is assumed to be an ] brotherhood, with which vast treasures are difficult to reconcile. (Yet a community, as opposed to individual wealth, for a future hoped-for temple is possible. Such is proposed by, among others, Andre Dupont-Sommer, Stephen Goranson, and Emile Puech.)
*Second, the treasure could be that of the Second Temple. However, Gaster cites ] as stating that the main treasure of the Temple was still in the building when it fell to the ], and also that other Qumranic texts appear to be too critical of the priesthood of the Temple for their authors to have been close enough to take away their treasures for safekeeping. *Second, the treasure could be that of the Second Temple. However, Gaster cites ] as stating that the main treasure of the Temple was still in the building when it fell to the ], and also that other Qumranic texts appear to be too critical of the priesthood of the Temple for their authors to have been close enough to take away their treasures for safekeeping. (The Arch of Titus shows some temple items taken to Rome. But several scholars expressed this view.)
*Third, the treasure could be that of the ], destroyed by ], King of ], in 586 BC. This would not seem to fit with the character of the other scrolls, unless perhaps the scroll was left in a cave during the ], possibly with a small community of caretakers who were precursors of the Dead Sea Scrolls community. *Third, the treasure could be that of the ], destroyed by ], King of ], in 586 BC. This would not seem to fit with the character of the other scrolls, unless perhaps the scroll was left in a cave during the ], possibly with a small community of caretakers who were precursors of the Dead Sea Scrolls community. (The scroll was written too late for this proposal.)
*Fourth, Gaster's own favourite theory is that the treasure is a <!---But Gaster DID say this. Gaster is a scholar and not a television personality. The media is usually wrong anyway. Scholars speaking to a camera for money. Leave this in until we find out that Gaster didn't know what he was talking about and is superceded by a better expert.--->hoax. If so, it is an elaborate hoax by an ancient people not known primarily for their sense of humor. *Fourth, Gaster's own favourite theory is that the treasure is a <!---But Gaster DID say this. Gaster is a scholar and not a television personality. The media is usually wrong anyway. Scholars speaking to a camera for money. Leave this in until we find out that Gaster didn't know what he was talking about and is superceded by a better expert.--->hoax. If so, it is an elaborate hoax by an ancient people not known primarily for their sense of humor.

There are other options besides those listed by Gaster (see Wolters in Bibliography p. 15-17 for a more up-to-date list). For instance Manfred Lehmann considered it Temple contributions collected after 70 CE.


Scholars are divided on whether the Copper Scroll represents real burials, and, if so, the total measurements and the owners. If it is folklore, it is poor as literature. In any case, it merits mentioning that the Copper Scroll, unlike some other texts, does not mention the ark of the covenant (unlike 2 Maccabees 2:4-10), nor urim and thummin, nor the temple menorah and other objects sometimes mistakenly associated with it in sensationalistic literature.{{fact||<!---if this can be footnoted with a scholarly reference, it really ought to replace or be merged with material in lead in this subsection. Gaster already covers Temple speculation which tends to be overemphasized by the media---> Scholars are divided on whether the Copper Scroll represents real burials, and, if so, the total measurements and the owners. If it is folklore, it is poor as literature. In any case, it merits mentioning that the Copper Scroll, unlike some other texts, does not mention the ark of the covenant (unlike 2 Maccabees 2:4-10), nor urim and thummin, nor the temple menorah and other objects sometimes mistakenly associated with it in sensationalistic literature.{{fact||<!---if this can be footnoted with a scholarly reference, it really ought to replace or be merged with material in lead in this subsection. Gaster already covers Temple speculation which tends to be overemphasized by the media--->

Thus far, no item mentioned in the Copper scroll has been found, in the majority view. The Qumran silver hoard has been suggested, but not linked specifically to a 3Q15 item. Even if it remains a failure as a treasure map, 3Q15, as a new, long ancient Hebrew text has significance. For example, as the comparative Semitic languages scholar noted, it has great significance for lexicography (in his review of Milik's edition, "The Small Caves of Qumran" in Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 89, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1969), pp. 128-141).
<!--Another distinctly minority view, of Robert Feather claims a link between the copper scroll and monotheism starter Akhenaten. According to Feather, the scroll describes the placing of the treasure in Amarna, main city of Egyptians in his time. For further information read on www.robert-feather.com.--> <!--Another distinctly minority view, of Robert Feather claims a link between the copper scroll and monotheism starter Akhenaten. According to Feather, the scroll describes the placing of the treasure in Amarna, main city of Egyptians in his time. For further information read on www.robert-feather.com.-->

Revision as of 12:30, 26 August 2009

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Copper Scroll" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (June 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Copper Scroll (3Q15) is one of the Dead Sea Scrolls found in Cave 3 near Khirbet Qumran, but differs significantly from the others. Whereas the other scrolls are written on parchment or papyrus, this scroll is written on metal: copper mixed with about 1% tin. Unlike the others, it is not a literary work, but a list of locations at which various items of gold and silver are buried or hidden. It differs from the other scrolls in its Hebrew (closer to the language of the Mishnah than to the literary Hebrew of the other scrolls, though 4QMMT shares some language characteristics), its orthography (i.e., its spelling), palaeography (forms of letters), and date (c.50-100 CE, possibly overlapping the latest of the other Qumran manuscripts). It is currently on display at the Archaeological Museum in Amman, Jordan.

History and origin

The scroll, on two rolls of copper, was found in 1952 at the back of Cave 3 at Qumran, the first cave to be explored. It was the last of 15 scrolls discovered in the cave, and is thus referred to as 3Q15. The corroded metal could not be unrolled by conventional means, and Professor H. Wright Baker, of the College of Technology at Manchester, England, therefore cut the sheets into strips. It then became clear that the rolls were part of the same document. John Marco Allegro, published his translation in 1960. Low-quality photographs of the scroll were published, but scholars found these difficult to work with, and have relied on a drawing of the text by scholar Józef Milik published in 1962. The scroll was rephotographed in 1988 with greater precision.

Scholarly estimates of the probable date range of The Copper Scroll vary, including dates from about 50 CE to 100 CE and may have been written after most of the other Qumran scrolls.

Writing style

The style of writing is unusual, different from the other scrolls. It is written in a style similar to Mishnaic Hebrew. There is an unusual orthography, and the script has the features resulting from someone writing on copper with a stylus. There is also the anomaly that seven of the names of locations are followed by a group of two or three Greek letters. The text is a listing of sixty-four locations; sixty-three of which are treasures of gold and silver, which have been estimated in the tons. The final listing points to a duplicate document with additional details. That other document has not been found.

Some scholars believe that the difficult to decipher text was perhaps copied from another original document by an illiterate scribe who did not speak the language in which the scroll was written. Perhaps this was done so that the secrecy of the content of the text would be preserved. This scribe made several errors, mistakes that someone familiar with the original language might not have made.

There is a distinctly minority view that the Cave of Letters might have contained one of the listed treasures , and if the artifacts from this location may have been recovered. Although the scroll was made of alloyed copper in order to last, the locations are written as if the reader would have an intimate knowledge of obscure references — e.g., "In the irrigation cistern(?) of the Shaveh, in the outlet that is in it, buried at eleven cubits: 70 talents of silver" (from Allegro's translation), or "In the cave that is next to the fountain belonging to the House of Hakkoz, dig six cubits. (There are) six bars of gold".

Translation

The following is an English translation of the opening lines of the Copper Scroll:

1:1 In the ruin which is in the valley of Acor, under
1:2 the steps leading to the East,
1:3 forty long cubits: a chest of silver and its vessels
1:4 with a weight of seventeen talents. KEN

Claims

The treasure of the scroll has been assumed to be treasure of the Jewish Temple, presumably the Second Temple.

There is mention of the "House of Hakkoz", with the family of Hakkoz being treasurers of the rebuilt Temple, following the return from Babylon, as listed in the Biblical Books of Ezra and Nehemiah.

The theories of the origin of the treasure were broken down by Theodor H. Gaster:

  • First, the treasure could be that of the Qumran community. The difficulty here is that the community is assumed to be an ascetic brotherhood, with which vast treasures are difficult to reconcile. (Yet a community, as opposed to individual wealth, for a future hoped-for temple is possible. Such is proposed by, among others, Andre Dupont-Sommer, Stephen Goranson, and Emile Puech.)
  • Second, the treasure could be that of the Second Temple. However, Gaster cites Josephus as stating that the main treasure of the Temple was still in the building when it fell to the Romans, and also that other Qumranic texts appear to be too critical of the priesthood of the Temple for their authors to have been close enough to take away their treasures for safekeeping. (The Arch of Titus shows some temple items taken to Rome. But several scholars expressed this view.)
  • Third, the treasure could be that of the First Temple, destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, in 586 BC. This would not seem to fit with the character of the other scrolls, unless perhaps the scroll was left in a cave during the Babylonian Exile, possibly with a small community of caretakers who were precursors of the Dead Sea Scrolls community. (The scroll was written too late for this proposal.)
  • Fourth, Gaster's own favourite theory is that the treasure is a hoax. If so, it is an elaborate hoax by an ancient people not known primarily for their sense of humor.

There are other options besides those listed by Gaster (see Wolters in Bibliography p. 15-17 for a more up-to-date list). For instance Manfred Lehmann considered it Temple contributions collected after 70 CE.

Scholars are divided on whether the Copper Scroll represents real burials, and, if so, the total measurements and the owners. If it is folklore, it is poor as literature. In any case, it merits mentioning that the Copper Scroll, unlike some other texts, does not mention the ark of the covenant (unlike 2 Maccabees 2:4-10), nor urim and thummin, nor the temple menorah and other objects sometimes mistakenly associated with it in sensationalistic literature.{{fact||

Thus far, no item mentioned in the Copper scroll has been found, in the majority view. The Qumran silver hoard has been suggested, but not linked specifically to a 3Q15 item. Even if it remains a failure as a treasure map, 3Q15, as a new, long ancient Hebrew text has significance. For example, as the comparative Semitic languages scholar noted, it has great significance for lexicography (in his review of Milik's edition, "The Small Caves of Qumran" in Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 89, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1969), pp. 128-141).


Media

In 1958, novelist Nathaniel Norsen Weinreb published The Copper Scrolls, the tale of a scribe named Kandane who is hired by a priest from Qumran to inscribe a list of sacred treasures. Weinreb wrote his novel before he or the general public learned that the so-called 'scrolls' of copper, were in reality, two separated sections of what was originally a single scroll about eight feet in length.

A Long Way to Shiloh (known in the USA as The Menorah Men so as not to be thought a Civil War novel) is a thriller by Lionel Davidson, published in 1966, whose plot follows the finding and contents of a similar treasure scroll.

The denouement of Edwin Black's Format C: included using the Copper Scroll to find the Silver Scroll, giving the protagonists the information they needed to find and defeat the main threat of the book.

The Copper Scroll is the subject of a political thriller, The Copper Scroll, by Joel C. Rosenberg, published in 2006. This book implements its author's theory that the treasures listed in the Copper Scroll (and the Ark of the Covenant) will be found in the End Times to refurnish the Third Temple.

It also features in Sean Young's novel, Violent Sands. In this historical novel, Barabbas is the sworn protector of the Copper Scroll and the treasure it points to. He is under orders to protect this document at all costs.

The scroll—and a search for its treasures—was featured in a 2007 episode of The History Channel series Digging For The Truth. The program gives a basic knowledge of the research of the Copper Scroll and all the major theories of its interpretation.

See also

Footnotes

  1. Robert R. Cargill, Center for Digital Humanities, UCLA, "On the Insignificance and the Abuse of the Copper Scroll", Bible and Interpretation, July 2009
  2. Inventory of Manuscripts from Qumran Cave 3
  3. García Martínez, Florentino and Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls: Study Edition, Paperback ed. 2 vols., (Leiden and Grand Rapids: Brill and Eerdmans, 2000).
  4. Theodor H. Gaster (1976). The Dead Sea Scriptures. Peter Smith Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-8446-6702-1.

References

Bibliography

  • Brooke, George J. (2002). Copper Scroll Studies. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Supplement Series, Vol. 40. New York: Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 0-82646-055-0. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Lefkovits, Judah K. (2000). The Copper Scroll 3Q15: A Reevaluation: A New Reading, Translation, and Commentary. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, Vol. 25. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 90-04-10685-5.
  • Parry, Donald W. (2005). Additional Genres and Unclassified Texts. The Dead Sea Scrolls Reader, Vol. 6. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers. pp. 250–261. ISBN 90-04-12646-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Text, commentary and French and English translations by Emile Puech in: Le rouleau de cuivre de la grotte 3 de Qumrân (3Q15) : expertise, restauration, epigraphie. Leiden : Brill : École biblique et archéologique française de Jérusalem : EDF Foundation, 2006. 2 volumes. Puech had access to the cleaned artifact and scans; Vol. 1, pages 169-216.
  • Wolters, Albert. The Copper Scroll: Overview, Text and Translation (Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, 1996).

External links


Ark of the Covenant topics
People
Lid
Contents
Locations
Related
Categories: