Misplaced Pages

User talk:Adraeus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:58, 12 December 2005 editNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits Comments← Previous edit Revision as of 07:06, 12 December 2005 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits CommentsNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


You are now in violation of the ]. I realize this may have been an oversight on your part, but you are nonetheless. IF you undo your most recent revert, and talk like a rational person on the Talk page, I am sure you won't be blocked. Otherwise, I will your negativism (or silence) as a sign of your uncooperativeness, and report your violation. -- ] ] 06:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC) You are now in violation of the ]. I realize this may have been an oversight on your part, but you are nonetheless. IF you undo your most recent revert, and talk like a rational person on the Talk page, I am sure you won't be blocked. Otherwise, I will your negativism (or silence) as a sign of your uncooperativeness, and report your violation. -- ] ] 06:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


]? Are you serious? No one is going to remotely believe my edits were vandalism, so I hope you enjoy your impending block. -- ] ] 07:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:06, 12 December 2005

Archives

/Archive001 · /Archive002 · /Archive003 · /Archive004 · /Archive005

Comments

I believe you are expressing some negative, and overbearing, attitudes related to that infobox. If there is a problem, I will be happy to fix it... if you calmly describe it on the talk page. -- Netoholic @ 06:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

You'll have to describe this "uglifying" in more specific terms. The only visual differences I see are a slight width change, left alignment of the bolded row headers, and a reduction in the amount of white-space. -- Netoholic @ 06:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

You are now in violation of the WP:3RR. I realize this may have been an oversight on your part, but you are nonetheless. IF you undo your most recent revert, and talk like a rational person on the Talk page, I am sure you won't be blocked. Otherwise, I will your negativism (or silence) as a sign of your uncooperativeness, and report your violation. -- Netoholic @ 06:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


Vandalism? Are you serious? No one is going to remotely believe my edits were vandalism, so I hope you enjoy your impending block. -- Netoholic @ 07:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)