User talk:Pungimaster: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:15, 2 September 2009 editAbce2 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,456 edits reply← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:41, 2 September 2009 edit undoAbce2 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,456 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule. (TW)Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::::If you want to, go to ] and start a new one. It's not going to work though. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::If you want to, go to ] and start a new one. It's not going to work though. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
	::::::If your so sure that were sockpuppets, file a sockpuppet investigation to prove it, as you must be right. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		::::::If your so sure that were sockpuppets, file a sockpuppet investigation to prove it, as you must be right. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:41, 2 September 2009

August 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Maulana Masood Azhar‎ appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. For further information, read WP:TERRORIST. Thank you.--RDavi404 (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Maulana Masood Azhar. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--RDavi404 (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Maulana Masood Azhar‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--RDavi404 (talk) 19:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 15 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at Maulana Masood Azhar‎. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nja 07:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Z9

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. —SpaceFlight89 11:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Maulana Masood Azhar. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nja 11:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Z9

September 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Nja247, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. It's not okay to call others terrorists at all. Just because you didn't get your way doesn't mean everyones a terrorist. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 04:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I call him a terrorist because he crashed planes into the Twin Towers, if that's not being a terrorist then what is? Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 04:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Read the second sentance on that article. It calls him a terrorist. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 04:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Sigh, I was talking about life. Not something like terrorists. And stop twisting my words around. You also may want to act better than, "Since I was blocked, I'll get angry," Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 04:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

As if I hadn't heard that one before.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

If you want to, go to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations and start a new one. It's not going to work though. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

If your so sure that were sockpuppets, file a sockpuppet investigation to prove it, as you must be right. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Abce2|From the top!Arg! 05:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:15, 2 September 2009 editAbce2 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,456 edits reply← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:41, 2 September 2009 edit undoAbce2 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,456 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule. (TW)Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:::::If you want to, go to ] and start a new one. It's not going to work though. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::If you want to, go to ] and start a new one. It's not going to work though. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
	::::::If your so sure that were sockpuppets, file a sockpuppet investigation to prove it, as you must be right. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		::::::If your so sure that were sockpuppets, file a sockpuppet investigation to prove it, as you must be right. ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]\|<small>]]</small> 05:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)