| Revision as of 03:34, 6 September 2009 editNifboy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,707 edits {{subst:VG deletion}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:19, 6 September 2009 edit undoA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Wholly insignificant character; player's character in the MOH/COD games might as well be nameless avatars. No claim of ] and zero ] (currently, article is referenced only to the games themselves). This is merely a regurgitation of game plot and a listing of "awards" (i.e. military recognitions) garnered by this make-believe fellow. Easily/sufficiently covered in main franchise article. No attempt to address the subject ], undoubtedly because no significant third-party sources responding to/scrutinizing this might-as-well-be-nameless character exist. --] (]) 02:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | Wholly insignificant character; player's character in the MOH/COD games might as well be nameless avatars. No claim of ] and zero ] (currently, article is referenced only to the games themselves). This is merely a regurgitation of game plot and a listing of "awards" (i.e. military recognitions) garnered by this make-believe fellow. Easily/sufficiently covered in main franchise article. No attempt to address the subject ], undoubtedly because no significant third-party sources responding to/scrutinizing this might-as-well-be-nameless character exist. --] (]) 02:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 03:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 03:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' . I did some searches on Google News and Google Books and was able to the various criticisms of the article above. The article is indeed a significant character who appears in multiple well-received mainstream games, including as the main character in one game who is additionally notable in the real world as being based on a historical figure. The article is not solely plot and I am not opposed to condensing that aspect of the article to make it more balanced, but in any event, the article now contains out of universe development information and some reception information. Looking at reviews, I expect to be able to add even more out of universe context, but just wanted to note the progress thus far. But as we have seen the article is being addressed now in an encyclopedic manner, because significant third-party sources regarding this fascinating character do indeed exist. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 16:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 6 September 2009
Manon Batiste
- Manon Batiste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wholly insignificant character; player's character in the MOH/COD games might as well be nameless avatars. No claim of notability and zero citations to third-party sources (currently, article is referenced only to the games themselves). This is merely a regurgitation of game plot and a listing of "awards" (i.e. military recognitions) garnered by this make-believe fellow. Easily/sufficiently covered in main franchise article. No attempt to address the subject in an encyclopedic manner, undoubtedly because no significant third-party sources responding to/scrutinizing this might-as-well-be-nameless character exist. --EEMIV (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep . I did some searches on Google News and Google Books and was able to address the various criticisms of the article above. The article is indeed a significant character who appears in multiple well-received mainstream games, including as the main character in one game who is additionally notable in the real world as being based on a historical figure. The article is not solely plot and I am not opposed to condensing that aspect of the article to make it more balanced, but in any event, the article now contains out of universe development information and some reception information. Looking at reviews, I expect to be able to add even more out of universe context, but just wanted to note the progress thus far. But as we have seen the article is being addressed now in an encyclopedic manner, because significant third-party sources regarding this fascinating character do indeed exist. Best, --A Nobody 16:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)