Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sustainability/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Sustainability Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:22, 27 November 2008 editSkipsievert (talk | contribs)13,044 editsm Some commentary on progress and suggestions← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:50, 8 September 2009 edit undoAlan Liefting (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers134,250 edits Subpages 
(79 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Incremental improving of article''': * '''Upgrade article per outline (below)''':
** Revise lead. Mostly done. ** Revise lead. {{done}}
** Definition section. Mostly done. ** "Scope and Definition" section. {{done}}
** "History" section. {{done}}
** Historic framing of sustainability, section Mostly done... needs condensing but material is good.
** "Description" section. {{done}}
⚫ ** ] for some sections to reduce article size
** "Measuring sustainability" section. {{done}}
** "Application/Implementation" section. Environmental management {{done}}
** "Application/Implementation" section. *] {{done}}
** "Remaining social material" ] {{done}}
** "Remaining economic material" ] {{done}}
** "Difficulties in the Application of Sustainability" section. {{done}}
** "Current Efforts in Applying Sustainability" section. {{done}}
* '''Upgrade article overall''':
⚫ ** ] for some sections to reduce article size - '''Underway'''
** Decide on content of the "See Also" section and Sustainability "Template" ** Decide on content of the "See Also" section and Sustainability "Template"
** Edit entire article according to "]: ** Edit entire article according to ] - '''Underway'''
***clear; style conforms to MoS ***clear; style conforms to MoS
***accurate and verifyable ***accurate, comprehensive and cohesive
***neutral
***comprehensive and cohesive
***neutral. Needs work ***suitable images
***side-bars in acceptable format. Content appropriate, comprehensive and not repetitive.
***stable. Pretty stable.
⚫ *** verified footnotes
***suitable images. Seems good.
**Revise 3 concentric circles diagram with the definition {{done}}
⚫ ***Edit and verify all footnotes
** Decide on appropriate content of the "Further Reading" section. ** Decide on appropriate content of the "Further Reading" section (check for duplication with quoted literature in article).
***Present all references in uniform style
** Determine whether to submit for ] or ] status
**Check against the featured article criteria (see below) - '''Underway'''
** Final copyediting and submission for ]
**]
**] attempt when criteria are met.
**Fix repetition between links, side bars and nav bars, also repetition within each one of these formats e.g. "environmental technology" nav bar contains several terms that are repeated in other navboxes. "Waste management" appears many, times: e.g., within "environmental technology" and then in several other navboxes: "Recycling and waste management by country," "Recycling by material" and "Topics related to waste management." The links within these navboxes can also be found in side bars. See FAs for guidance.
*(set up "talk" page to guide future editors - archives of discussion on separate sections etc.)
*Each editor to copy-edit re-read
*Re-think the Lead


'''Current tasks''' '''Current tasks'''
* Revision of article as per "to do" list
See the bottom of this talk page for the latest discussions and contribute to improving the article. Mostly that is being done in real time with counter point sandbox discussions also. Participation in editing the article is encouraged and suggestions and comments are welcome below.

==Subpages==
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] Environmental management
*] Management of consumption
*]
*]
*]
*] (was Talk:Sustainability/Barriers)
*]

Latest revision as of 19:50, 8 September 2009

  • Upgrade article per outline (below):
    • Revise lead.  Done
    • "Scope and Definition" section.  Done
    • "History" section.  Done
    • "Description" section.  Done
    • "Measuring sustainability" section.  Done
    • "Application/Implementation" section. Environmental management  Done
    • "Application/Implementation" section. *Human consumption management  Done
    • "Remaining social material" Social material  Done
    • "Remaining economic material" Economic material  Done
    • "Difficulties in the Application of Sustainability" section.  Done
    • "Current Efforts in Applying Sustainability" section.  Done
  • Upgrade article overall:
    • Summary style for some sections to reduce article size - Underway
    • Decide on content of the "See Also" section and Sustainability "Template"
    • Edit entire article according to GA nomination - Underway
      • clear; style conforms to MoS
      • accurate, comprehensive and cohesive
      • neutral
      • suitable images
      • side-bars in acceptable format. Content appropriate, comprehensive and not repetitive.
      • verified footnotes
    • Revise 3 concentric circles diagram with the definition  Done
    • Decide on appropriate content of the "Further Reading" section (check for duplication with quoted literature in article).
      • Present all references in uniform style
    • Check against the featured article criteria (see below) - Underway
    • Get creative feedback (Peer review)
    • FA review attempt when criteria are met.
    • Fix repetition between links, side bars and nav bars, also repetition within each one of these formats e.g. "environmental technology" nav bar contains several terms that are repeated in other navboxes. "Waste management" appears many, times: e.g., within "environmental technology" and then in several other navboxes: "Recycling and waste management by country," "Recycling by material" and "Topics related to waste management." The links within these navboxes can also be found in side bars. See FAs for guidance.
  • (set up "talk" page to guide future editors - archives of discussion on separate sections etc.)
  • Each editor to copy-edit re-read
  • Re-think the Lead

Current tasks

  • Revision of article as per "to do" list

Subpages