| Revision as of 13:28, 17 December 2005 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →Your statements about Turks← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:29, 17 December 2005 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →A Turk-Murderer, eh?: rm, unsuitable for Misplaced PagesNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| I am opposed to the Annan plan, and as far as the EU problems with the Turks - let them answer to their own crimes. They have a lot to come to terms with first. (] 04:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)) | I am opposed to the Annan plan, and as far as the EU problems with the Turks - let them answer to their own crimes. They have a lot to come to terms with first. (] 04:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)) | ||
| == A Turk-Murderer, eh? == | |||
| So, you enjoy killing Turks, do you? That comment of yours in the TRNC discussion section makes it pretty clear what you think of reconciliation. And people wonder why I support the right of the ] to exist as a recognized state. Its people like you who do more to justify the existance of the TRNC than anyone else, with you pro-enosist, Turk-hating nihlistic attitude. The enosist Makarios, the terrorist Grivas, the hypocritical Turk-hating Orthrodox Church, and the murderer Sampson couldn't dislodge the Turkish Cypriot presence on the Island and neither will Papadopoulos! Long live TRNC. ] | |||
| :In Cyprus, there are no such thing as Turks, there are only a Moslem minority, and look what Moslems did in London. We have always respected the right of The Moslem minority. And for the so called defacto 'TRNC', no such thing exists on the map, and it never will now Cyprus have entered the European Union, so stick to your pipe dreams if you must. Not even your own country of England recognizes them and they are the most pro-Turkish country in the World, I have seen your sycophantic way of dealing with Turks on your Talk page, pandering to their conspiracy theories about the murder of 2 Million Armenians as well as their conspiracy theories about the Cyprus. The Turks also killed 5000 people during the invasion, children and women, and raping the women as well and dont you forget there are 1619 missing Greek Cypriots. Also, you remember the genocide of the Greeks in Turkey during 1923 onwards, and from a population of over 1 million Greeks in Turkey, there remain only a few hundred, how can they claim any kind of moral high ground over protecting minority rights? | |||
| Did you know there were even cases of Turkish Barbarians gutting Armenian women who were pregnant and killing the unborn babies inside? These are the kinds of people you want in the EU? The more and more you people support Moslems, the more and more bold they will become, they will start to demand more and more 'special' rights (already now in England it is illegal to criticize Islam and you can arrested for it), and they will eventually conquer you, Islam is evil, and you had better believe it, because Turkey epitomizes Islam, it is Islam and Nationalism. | |||
| ''"Muslims are paranoid, have victim mentality, feel humiliated, have explosive personality, are vengeful, lack empathy, are oblivious of the pain that they cause to others, lack conscience, consider themselves superior to others, demand preferential treatments while deny the basic human rights to others, are scornful and abusive of others but expect respect and undeserving recognition, lack self- esteem but are most concerned about their image. …Muslims do not value personal integrity and do not respect the rights of other people. None of the so-called Islamic human rights organizations are concerned about the abysmal rights of non-Muslims in Islamic countries and not even about the human rights abuses of nominal Muslims in Islamic countries. They pup up only in non Muslim democracies and their sole mission is to wreak havoc when someone criticizes Islam, demand apologies and resignations and make sure that Muslims are treated preferentially.'' | |||
| ''Muslims have grandiose sense of self-importance and expect to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements. They are envious of others and believe that others are envious of them. They are arrogant and show haughty behaviors and attitudes. They suffer from chronic lack of confidence and are fundamentally dissatisfied, but mask this with violence and a ruthless exploitative personality, victimizing often those who are most vulnerable and can't retaliate. These were traditionally their wives and children, but now with terrorism, they can victimize everyone and enjoy the sensation of power that this gives them. They seek respect and importance by instilling fear. Their brazen and reckless behavior covers up for a depressive, anxious interior. Their souls are barren landscapes of misery and fears. You may find individual Muslims who do not fall into this mold. But we are talking about general traits and not exceptions.'' | |||
| ''Muslims are walking scar tissues. They collectively suffer from narcissistic personality disorder because they have entered in Muhammad's psychotic bubble universe, think like him and behave like him. The more they emulate their role model and are influenced by his psychotic mind, the more pathological they become. However, since the narcissistic personality disorder of Muslims is a reflection of Muhammad's psychosis, once they leave Islam and are no more influenced by its nefarious effect, they can recover, albeit it requires effort and self-awareness. Likewise, those who convert to Islam, and to the extent that they follow Muhammad, acquire his disorder, become narcissists and even dangerous."'' | |||
| '''- Ali Sina''' | |||
| ==Your statements about Turks== | ==Your statements about Turks== | ||
| Your recent statements about Turks ( , and anything similar) are absolutely unacceptable on Misplaced Pages. I am removing them. Do not attempt to replace them. Do not repeat any similar inflammatory statements about any other person or group or nation of persons. This is a final warning. --]|] 13:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | Your recent statements about Turks ( , and anything similar) are absolutely unacceptable on Misplaced Pages. I am removing them. Do not attempt to replace them. Do not repeat any similar inflammatory statements about any other person or group or nation of persons. This is a final warning. --]|] 13:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 17 December 2005
Welcome!
Hello GreekWarrior, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also Misplaced Pages:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Courtkittie (talk) July 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Erm, who the hell are you?
La Prensa
Hello ! I just noticed your message, sorry for the little delay before the answer. Very glad to see you in the community, that's a very positive step for everybody !
Regarding the subject at hand, it is obvious that your knowledge of the topic is very good, as are your feelings over the matter. Given the policy of Misplaced Pages, however, only the "knowledge" part is allowed in, not the "feelings", and it can sometimes be honestly difficult to tell one from the other.
If you see that example of the typical difference between your view of the article, you can notice that the version which I am reverting to has a more general and nuanced view of the matter ("However, the paper was also critical of the nascent ruling junta which succeeded Somoza"...); your version tends to feel like it aims at demonstrating something; for instance, the beginning:
- It is now largely known now, that La Prensa recieved large amounts of funding from The CIA. It espoused a violent overthrowal of the regime and fully supported the American Proxy Army, the Contras, in their attacks against Nicaraguan Governmental Targets and Civilian Infrastructure (CIA Director William Casey's orders to attack 'Soft Targets').
Compare to something like (I know nothing about the topic so you'll have to provide the actual information)
- La Prensa was founded in X by X, who was X (like, a well-known right-wing politician, a Human right activist, a religious personlity ?). It was intended as a publication (perhaps put something like the motto of the paper here, the way its director described it, ...)
- It had the following stance upon the following topics. the following event, it took the following stance, notably saying this when that happened.
- That, this and that led to suspicions from those that it had pro-US sympathies; accusations of arose from these people (citation/reference if possible).
- In (long afterward), the release of the following documents (citation/reference) proved that the following accusations were
I hope that you see what I mean. I would encourage you to start a new section on the talk page of the article, suggest a version, and see how it shapes. It is interesting, for instance, to see what sort of things which seem straightforward to you can be difficult or dubious for others, and se when and how explanations, references, etc. are necessary. I can help if necessary.
Have you seen Ken Loach's Carla's Song ?
Thank you for the spirit of it ! Good work and cheers ! Rama 13:31, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I'll get around to changing my draft as soon as possible. Btw, I haven't seen 'Carla's song', but I intend to when I have the time. Thanks for the advice on how to structure my redraft as well.--GreekWarrior 13:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
You called Nikos Sampson 'a good man'????? With an attitude like that, no wonder there's nwever going to be any hope of reconciliation on Cyprus. I take it you're pro-Enosis, fanatically anti-Turk, and want to ethnically cleanse Cyprus of everything non-Greek.......or am I being too subtle in my observation? --User:Expatkiwi 02:01, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
From a Greek Cypriot in the US
Dude you should not be such an enosist. Those who supported that dream destroyed the unity of Cyprus by not respecting the 1960 constitution. Then the Turks took it a step further.
I am opposed to the Annan plan, and as far as the EU problems with the Turks - let them answer to their own crimes. They have a lot to come to terms with first. (UNFanatic 04:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC))
Your statements about Turks
Your recent statements about Turks ( , and anything similar) are absolutely unacceptable on Misplaced Pages. I am removing them. Do not attempt to replace them. Do not repeat any similar inflammatory statements about any other person or group or nation of persons. This is a final warning. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)