Misplaced Pages

User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:12, 11 October 2009 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,990 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:20, 11 October 2009 edit undoNovickas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,221 edits Notice of mention at another page - new sectionNext edit →
Line 321: Line 321:
== Thanks == == Thanks ==
Hi Piotrus. Thanks for the template and the award. I tried to do my best and continued to improved and created article of the Piast dynasty members. Thanks again and sorry for my bad english!!! ] (]) 19:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Hi Piotrus. Thanks for the template and the award. I tried to do my best and continued to improved and created article of the Piast dynasty members. Thanks again and sorry for my bad english!!! ] (]) 19:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

==Notice of mention at another page==

I have left a message regarding your use of ] to store grievances at ]'s talk page, since he is an admin both here and at Wikibooks. I feel it was an inappropriate use of that project. ] (]) 22:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:20, 11 October 2009

This user wrote 632 DYKs: 632 This user wrote 82 Good-class articles.: 82 This user wrote 6 A-class articles.: 6 =This user wrote 22 Featured-class articles.: 22
There is no Cabal

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
Archive
Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archiving icon

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Reasons for my raising wikistress:

Some general observations on Misplaced Pages governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Misplaced Pages is a kawaii mistress :)


I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online


Username for SOC0317

Piotr,

My name is Erika Moul, and I am a student in your SOC0317 class, and I am very confused by the Misplaced Pages assignments. I have made a username (Emm66) and have gone through the tutorial, but I do not understand how you will be tracking my activity. I hope that you can clear this up for me so that I am able to meet the Sept. 21st deadline for the Wiki assignment. Also, my group members are Angela Han and Mariah J(?).

Further, when I posted my blog commentary this morning, I noticed that my comment to another student's entry from last week does not appear on the blog. Do you have record of my making a second posting last week? (I had posted it on Saturday afternoon.) If there was a computer error and you did not receive the post, is there any way that I can make it up? If not, how will this affect my grade? Since the blog comments are 50% of our grade, I am very concerned about this matter. Thank you for your understanding - please advise.

Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Erika Moul username: Emm66 | email: emm66@pitt.edu

global society

i have created my account and posted a diff of an article. my account is d.j.weingart


http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Craigellachie,_Moray&diff=315199599&oldid=306286192


                -Dan W

Assignment Completed

I have created an account, joined group 6, completed the tutorial and edited a page. The page I edited is

Justin Lovett jml72 22:13 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Diff

I tried to post my diff earlier but I think I did it wrong, so here you go: ]

Justin Lovett jml72 23:04 20 September 2009 (UTC)

New Account

I managed to make a new account. Username: mariahjenae

~Mariah Blake~


Patrick Atkins

My username is PatrickJatkins and my real name is Patrick Atkins. I am in Group 10.

My user name

Hi Piotor,

My name is Teresa Green and my user name is T.starr.green. Also, I had a family emergency last Friday (that is why i wasn't in class) is it OK if I still do my comment on someones post? I did the summary, but because of the family emergency I did not have the opportunity to do it

-Teresa

Edit

Piotr,

Additionally, I made an edit to the Peters Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania page ].

-Erika Moul

Piotr,

I made an edit to the Suffield High School page. And several in the sandbox, see

ColleenHelen (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

account, edit, group

Hi, I set up my account (username: mariahjenae)and have completed the sandbox edits through the tutorial. I edited an article about Mercersburg, Pennsylvania by including the opening day of the ski season(Thanksgiving) to the information about the Whitetail Ski Resort. I have also joined group 7 with Erika, Angela, Amber, and Dominique.

Thanks, Mariah Blake

Misplaced Pages Assignments

Hi this is Sean McNamara I have completed the tutorial, joined the group, and made an edit (University of Pittsburgh page, added comments regarding residence halls)

missing information

I'm Jessica McCracken....my wiki username is Jam187....i thought i already gave the info to you but i might not have

````

Group 2 Article & Plan

Hello!

As we asked you in class - we would like to do Deviant Subculture. I made an article for it since there was none on Misplaced Pages - I am not sure if it will still be there because some speedy removal alert came up and I am unsure of how to address it, I added some headings to it.

Here is our preliminary plan for completing the article. As we complete the preliminary research we will further refine the outline and plan of action.

Overall/General Information

Definition
What makes a culture/group deviant

Examples

Past prime examples
Current prime examples
Prime examples of movements

Effect of Globalization

Discussion of what made prime examples prime and not present
Increase in tolerance
Strengthening of Groups
Networking
Strength in numbers
Global movements

We have divided preliminary research in the following way:

John - Overall definition and ways to categorize.

Kate - past examples of deviant subcultures and social movements.

Ragini - Present examples of deviant subcultures and movements.

Jessica - Present examples of deviant subcultures and movements.

Melissa - tolerance and networking.

Everybody will look for information and examples dealing with globalization.

Please let us know if this article and plan are acceptable!

Thank you Rgg6 (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Piotrus, the article almost got deleted because there was essentially no content beyond the definition. (I declined it, & added an underconstruction tag.) It would probably be of some help to try to have at least an initial paragraph and a general reference at the start. DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


Hi, we actually found an article "counterculture" which was essentially our topic.

We would like to switch to:

Topic: First World http://en.wikipedia.org/First_world

1. Overall Information a. Definition of a first world country i. GDP, GNP, prosperity – other number based quantities 2. Three World Model a. Origins b. Changes c. Relationship b/n the First World and the 2nd and 3rd floors 3. First World pre 1914 4. First World post 1914 5. Recent ( based on research – what do experts consider recent) changes in countries belonging to First World a. Globalization i. Pros- examples 1. Free trade ii. Cons - examples 1. Specialization can lead to people losing jobs b. Ascension and descent of certain countries in and out i. General information – why membership changes ii. Examples 1. Reasons particular to the country (as opposed to the general reasons listed above)

Division of Work among Group Members: Melissa – Overall Information, recent examples of countries entering or leaving first world Ragini – three world model Jessica F – first world pre 1914 Kate – first world post 1914 John Adams – globalization in connection with First World

Rgg6 (talk) 18:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Group 4 Plan, Pax Mongolica

Here is group four's flexible plan: We are expanding a stub on Pax Mongolica. The outline for the article is: 1. Introduction to the subject and academic term; 2. Rise and early years of the Pax Mongolica; 3. General Pax Mongolica period (what was covered in Before European Hegemony basically); 4. Latter years and "decline" of Pax Mongolica One person will work on part 1 and this same person will work on part 2; Two persons will work on part 2; Two persons will work on part 3 because it will be the bulk of the article; One person will work on part 4. As of now our plan is to have Stefan work on parts 1&2, Sean will work on part 2, Carly and Lauren will work on part 3, and Jessica will work on part 4. We have picked out several books to help us with our research and will use these appropriately. Gxlarson (talk) 04:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Group 10 Game Plan

The group will be covering Semi-periphery countries.

Eric: Definition of the Semi-periphery
Pat: Semi-periphery countries in the 13th century
Dan: Semi-periphery countries from the 13th to today
John: Semi-periphery countries Today
Chazz: Transitional Effects on Exising Systems

D.j.weingart (talk) 05:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Extra points for Wiki

Hello,

I should have 2 extra points for the wikipedia:

(1) Showing my edit to the class (2) Posting a diff of my edit to your talk page

Thanks Ragini

Rgg6 (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Sophia of Poland

Thank you, Piotrus. I've had two articles on the Did you know page before. I don't know how to nominate an article and I thought the creator of the article couldn't nominate it. Thank You--David (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Group 6

Hello, our group will be covering the topic of proto globalization. (talk) 04:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:GA assignment

Food power was recently redirected to Embargo, and Deviant subculture has a PROD tag. Group 7 might also pick a more concise title (like "Gender in Chinese globalization" or something similar). Other than that, things are looking good. Should be an interesting term. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 21:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

It has the potential to work as an encyclopedic article, but if it isn't well-done it definitely won't work. Depending on how able you think they are, you can either let them try it or suggest another topic. It's tricky, but it might turn out fine. The problem here is that the chance that it won't work - especially given their inexperience - is higher than the chance that it will. Short answer is, it's your call - let them try, or don't. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
That would work (I'd suggest calling it "Chinese globalization" or "Globalization in China"), but you're right - it would be very broad, and as a result unlikely to achieve GA without an incredible amount of work. It's a question of balance - the gender topic is narrower, but this one is easier to find good encyclopedic information for. 23:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Group 1 : Polyethnicity plan / mini-outline

We first decided to create headlines we would like to fill in, so we came up with:

Defining Poly ethnicity

basic concept

Conceptual History

the history of the concept, its origins, etc

Polyethnicity throughout History

a lot of what we have read in the book thus far, as well as other significant examples

Poly ethnicity and Ethnic Identity

this will highlight how widespread polyethnicity is, but how cultures are able to retain ethnic identity. This could ultimate feed into the idea of homogeneity

The Assimilation of Ethnicities

this will discuss how it is possible for some cultures to eventually assimilate, or combine. Specific examples will be given


To begin our research, we are all meeting at the Hillman Library and pulling many books that have polyethnic concepts in them. Once we get a solid amount of books, we are going to divide up all the reading between the group, note everything (including page numbers and whatnot), and then meet up to see what we have.

The other thing we will have to do (hopefully you can direct us here) is rename the article on Misplaced Pages. Currently, it is found under Polyethnicity. This could problematic, because "polyethnicity" does not actually seem to exist as a word. I am not really sure if we do anything about that. The word that does actually exist is polyethnic.

Nec26 (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

  1. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polyethnicity
  2. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/polyethnicity
  3. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polyethnic
  4. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/polyethnic

Extra Credit

I made some edits to my old high school's wiki. I added a lot of references within the athletics section, as well added a new tidbit.

St. Charles East High School#Athletics

Nec26 (talk) 01:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 5 October 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Landflucht

Updated DYK query On October 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Landflucht, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
SoWhy 16:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Adolf Bniński

Updated DYK query On October 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adolf Bniński, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Ed (talkcontribs) 23:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Suwałki Agreement GAN...

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Piotrus :)

My question about rynek glowny was that nobody in either Polish or English article included information about Walenty Badylak and I don't understand why. I basically grew up on rynek (ooo... the good old times!!!) and I remember learning about the tragedy early on, whenever it was possible. I could never walk by the well without knowing. But why nobody ever included the info in Krk history? --Koliber (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

8th Rifle Division (Soviet Union)

Thanks for your kind words. I've got a long-term plan to continue the translations as far as possible from Ru-wiki, the next being the 10th Rifle Division (Soviet Union). Would you be able to help at all? Cheers Buckshot06(prof) 23:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Addendum: I can see you're busy with your class etc, but if you have any interest, please take a look/help out/direct others to User:Buckshot06/3rd Guards Motor Rifle Division which is in fact the next on my list. Cheers Buckshot06(prof) 12:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Am I suitable

This is a rather unusual request, but I'd like to know whether you think I'm a viable admin candidate. I would appreciate any advice, opinion, or commentary that you have to offer. Thanks again.Smallman12q (talk) 01:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Implicit vs explicit

You still don't understand the difference. Explicitly there was a line that said south is Poland, north is Lithuania. We promise not to cross the line. Explicitly zero was said about Vilnius. Implicitly Vilnius was on the Lithuanian side. By drawing the line south of Vilnius Poland implicitly recognized Lithuanian claims to the city, as well as hundreds of other villages, towns, and cities. The same way as Vilnius was alloted to Lithuania, Suwalki was alloted to Poland. No one can deny that. Just look at any map. Renata (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Zeligowski's letter explaining his mutiny to Polish command (quoted in full in Lescius work) references Suwalki Agreement and his disappointment and outrage that Poland pre-destined Vilnius to be left on the Lithuanian side for good (in reference of any further negotiations). Renata (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Juliusz Słowacki

The present bicentennial of Juliusz Słowacki's birth (and the 160th anniversary of his death) might indeed make a good occasion to refurbish the article about him. Nihil novi (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Piotrus. Thanks for the template and the award. I tried to do my best and continued to improved and created article of the Piast dynasty members. Thanks again and sorry for my bad english!!! Aldebaran69 (talk) 19:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Notice of mention at another page

I have left a message regarding your use of Wikibooks to store grievances at User:SB Johnny's talk page, since he is an admin both here and at Wikibooks. I feel it was an inappropriate use of that project. Novickas (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)