| Revision as of 20:49, 15 October 2009 editLa mome (talk | contribs)767 edits →Comments by other users: block that IP too← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:39, 19 October 2009 edit undoBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,621 edits closeNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== | ||
| *{{admin-note}} - While it could quite possibly be ObserverNY, the edit is nothing more than a simple grammar fix. I don't see that any action is really necessary here, although I will leave this up for another administrator to take a look at. <font color="navy">''']</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | *{{admin-note}} - While it could quite possibly be ObserverNY, the edit is nothing more than a simple grammar fix. I don't see that any action is really necessary here, although I will leave this up for another administrator to take a look at. <font color="navy">''']</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *:IP tagged as a sock, if further edits are made it should be blocked. 03:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{SPIclose}} | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 19 October 2009
ObserverNY
ObserverNY (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ObserverNY/Archive.
Report date October 15 2009, 19:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- 68.194.235.103 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong
Several weeks ago, 68.194 made this edit, and Observer later admitted that she had made the edit in an attempt to prove a point, and referred to it as her "silly game". Observer was later banned for incivility and other issues.
Recently, the IP made this edit. It's not a particularly significant edit, but that seems like block evasion to me. I brought this up at WP:ANI and was told to open an SPI. — HelloAnnyong 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
ObserverNY comments on "enrolled in vs attend" hereand edited anonymously on other pages here Most definitely is ObserverNY. Doesn’t matter if it is just a “grammar fix.” That IP needs to be blocked as well. La mome (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Administrator note - While it could quite possibly be ObserverNY, the edit is nothing more than a simple grammar fix. I don't see that any action is really necessary here, although I will leave this up for another administrator to take a look at. NW (Talk) 19:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- IP tagged as a sock, if further edits are made it should be blocked. 03:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
|
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |
{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.
Categories: