| Revision as of 23:17, 21 December 2005 editEvilphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,023 edits good decision← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:20, 21 December 2005 edit undoEvilphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,023 edits →Article bans: updating bans to reflect Linuxbeak's ban on NoticeboardsNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| :Good decision. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 23:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | :Good decision. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 23:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == |
==Active bans== | ||
| ===Terminating 0147 UTC 28 December, 2006=== | |||
| *] and all subpages | |||
| ===Terminating 0001 UTC 13 January, 2006=== | ===Terminating 0001 UTC 13 January, 2006=== | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
Revision as of 23:20, 21 December 2005
This page is a central resource for editors and administrators monitoring the Misplaced Pages:probation of Andy Mabbett.
See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing for the terms of the probation.
Pigsonthewing(talk · contribs · checkuser · block user · block log · edit count)
Banned from editing Jeremy Clarkson and Longbridge
As a result of the arbitration case, Pigonthewing was subject to the following limitations:
- Probation: "He may be banned for good cause by any administrator from any page or talk page which he disrupts."
- "limited to one revert per article per week, excluding simple vandalism, for a period of one year. Determination of when this has been violated may be done by any uninvolved administrator."
Enforcement is "blocked for a short period, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses, should he edit any page from which he has been banned or excessively revert any page. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year."
His response to this was: "I shall treat that with the utter contempt that it deserves."
True to his word, that same morning he:
- Edit warred on Longbridge over the presence of a photograph: , ,
- Edit warred on Jeremy Clarkson over a "npov-section" tag: , ,
He was blocked for forty-eight hours because of this.
Looking at the history of Jeremy Clarkson, it seemed to methat this is a continuation of a long-running edit war in which he was involved.
He had also previously removed the picture from Longbridge in October, and it was recently restored by Leonig Mig, who did not engage in the subsequent edit war.
He is banned from editing Jeremy Clarkson or Longbridge until 0001 UTC, 13 January, 2006.
If he edits either article before then, the enforcement clause will apply. He may be blocked for up to one week. After five such blocks (one has already been executed, so he has four left) the maximum period of the block rises to one year.
He can still perform non-disruptive edits on the talk pages of both articles.
Ban issued by User:Tony Sidaway in order to curb the disruption.
I suggest that a strategy for administrators to deal with any further serious disruption in future would be to add any other seriously disrupted articles to this ban and reset the one-month ban to run from the current date. This would reduce the likelihood of there being a round-robin disruption, with edit wars erupting anew as the bans conclude, should Andy Mabbett fail to curb his disruptive editing. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 09:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Banned from Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard and all subpages
I have banned Andy from editing the Admin noticeboard for unnecessary troublestirring. This ban is to last for a period of one week. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 13:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Good decision. Ëvilphoenix 23:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Active bans
Terminating 0147 UTC 28 December, 2006
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard and all subpages