| Revision as of 00:55, 7 November 2009 editBibliomaniac15 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators33,093 editsm Due to recent vandalism from this IP address, it has been blocked for 1 week.← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:02, 14 November 2009 edit undoMiesianiacal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,041 edits →November 2009: +Next edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' for a period of '''1 week''' from editing for {{#if:|{{{reason}}}|persistent ]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our ] first. ''''']]]''''' 00:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' for a period of '''1 week''' from editing for {{#if:|{{{reason}}}|persistent ]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our ] first. ''''']]]''''' 00:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | ||
| ] is not limited to exceeding three reverts in a 24hr period. Long-term reverting without accordant discussion can also be construed as edit warring. I began a discussion on the matter you object to at ], but you have so far refused to leave long-standing content alone or engage in dialogue. I have notified the admin who just blocked you for one week about your return to your earlier behaviour that got you blocked. In light of that, I suggest you adopt a more collegial approach. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">] ]</span> 09:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:02, 14 November 2009
May 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prime Minister of Canada, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Prime Minister of Canada was changed by 174.7.14.105 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-05-27T02:49:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Michaëlle Jean, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. This applies also to Governor General of Canada --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:44, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Michaëlle Jean shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 04:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Prime Minister of Canada. It is considered vandalism, which, under Misplaced Pages policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you. SoxBot III (talk | owner) 17:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
You have reached your three revert limit at Michaëlle Jean. Please engage in discussion rather than edit warring. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Michaëlle Jean
I'd really like to suggest you use the talk pages. If you have a valid reason for trying to make these changes explain them and see what others think. If you just keep trying to make the change without discussion it could possibly end up with this IP blocked for edit warring.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to United States Capitol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. APK say that you love me 01:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, you will be blocked from editing. APK say that you love me 01:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Great Seal of the United States. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. APK say that you love me 01:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Willking1979 (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Prime Ministerial Limousine (Australia) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Javierito92 (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Prime Ministerial Limousine (Australia). Thank you. Posted By Alex Waelde (talk) 21:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Prime Ministerial Limousine (Australia). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Javierito92 (talk) 21:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Prime Ministerial Limousine (Australia). Javierito92 (talk) 21:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoyadds 21:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
You have been warned plenty of times already about the consequences of reverting without discussion or even explanation. If you have an issue with something that's been long-standing in an article, raise the matter at talk, per WP:BRD. Also, keep in mind the 3RR limits that have been frequently pointed out to you. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 20:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page Human feces has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Nezzadar 23:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to the page User:Nezzadar. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Nezzadar 00:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. bibliomaniac15 00:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring is not limited to exceeding three reverts in a 24hr period. Long-term reverting without accordant discussion can also be construed as edit warring. I began a discussion on the matter you object to at General Motors, but you have so far refused to leave long-standing content alone or engage in dialogue. I have notified the admin who just blocked you for one week about your return to your earlier behaviour that got you blocked. In light of that, I suggest you adopt a more collegial approach. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 09:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)