Revision as of 22:02, 24 December 2005 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,064 edits →Sting (biology← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:21, 25 December 2005 edit undoIzehar (talk | contribs)6,567 edits Bonaparte's blockNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Re:HoJiP temp== | ==Re:HoJiP temp== | ||
I don't want to delete it myself in case ISAAC stirs again. And perhaps some of this material may atually be used somewhere else. I don't know what to do with it, but I see no reason to delete it right now. I won't object to it if you delete it though. Enjoy your vacations!--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 22:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | I don't want to delete it myself in case ISAAC stirs again. And perhaps some of this material may atually be used somewhere else. I don't know what to do with it, but I see no reason to delete it right now. I won't object to it if you delete it though. Enjoy your vacations!--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 22:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Bonaparte's block == | |||
Mikka, you blocked {{user|Bonaparte}} for one week. In my opinion, that is a bit excessive and, as there is no firm policy backing to this block and the fact that you are in a content dispute with this user makes it, in my view, inappropriate. Bonaparte has already served 24 hours and that is the typical block vandals are given. Anyway, as Bonaparte has agreed to stop revert-warring over Cyrillic names (see ]) I have unblocked him. I just wanted to run this by you. Thanks. ] 20:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:21, 25 December 2005
- GONE on wiki-VACATION
I am reclusing from any larger intellectual work. I will occasionally do categorizing or minor typo fixes. But I will not do any major edits and not engage in any discussions and answer any requests.
Please don't post at this page until January 13, 2006 mikka (t) 22:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Sting (biology
Sting (biology) had two simultaneous proposals to merge to other articles (Venom (poison) and Stinger (organ)). Having placed the only comment so far in the discussion on this, in favour of the 1st option, I was a little surprised to see you removed that merger tag for the second option.
I guess you did not like the expanded mark-up used rather than the plain 'mergeto' tag. I thought likewise as I went to add the second mergeto suggestion. However I then reallised that the expanded format allowed a forced choice of where the discussion takes place, and having 2 merge suggestions was clearly going to split any discussion held about this page. I've therefore reverted, hope you don't mind :-)
I suspect the merge sugestions will generate little interest, and i'll be bold in about a couple of weeks (allowing you time to return from your wikibreak) and will happily perform the merger. David Ruben 13:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Re:HoJiP temp
I don't want to delete it myself in case ISAAC stirs again. And perhaps some of this material may atually be used somewhere else. I don't know what to do with it, but I see no reason to delete it right now. I won't object to it if you delete it though. Enjoy your vacations!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Bonaparte's block
Mikka, you blocked Bonaparte (talk · contribs) for one week. In my opinion, that is a bit excessive and, as there is no firm policy backing to this block and the fact that you are in a content dispute with this user makes it, in my view, inappropriate. Bonaparte has already served 24 hours and that is the typical block vandals are given. Anyway, as Bonaparte has agreed to stop revert-warring over Cyrillic names (see User talk:Bonaparte#Unblocking) I have unblocked him. I just wanted to run this by you. Thanks. Izehar 20:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)