| Revision as of 16:57, 14 December 2009 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:06, 14 December 2009 edit undoPelleSmith (talk | contribs)7,078 edits →Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry: again stop harassing meNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :::No it is not. I don't need to answer your question and I find this, much like your comment about my tag, to be annoying. If you want to provide the diff of me editing that page in the future as evidence that I'm stalking your edits ... which is clearly what you're implying ... then be my guest. I really don't care what conclusions you want to draw from this. In the meantime stop harassing me with these personal questions, none of which have anything to do with improving the encyclopedia. Regards.] (]) 16:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | :::No it is not. I don't need to answer your question and I find this, much like your comment about my tag, to be annoying. If you want to provide the diff of me editing that page in the future as evidence that I'm stalking your edits ... which is clearly what you're implying ... then be my guest. I really don't care what conclusions you want to draw from this. In the meantime stop harassing me with these personal questions, none of which have anything to do with improving the encyclopedia. Regards.] (]) 16:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::It is indeed a valid concern. You have shown up on at least three pages where you have previously never edited before, on articles I have either created or edited shortly before your arrival there. ''']''' (]) 16:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | ::::It is indeed a valid concern. You have shown up on at least three pages where you have previously never edited before, on articles I have either created or edited shortly before your arrival there. ''']''' (]) 16:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::::] is that way. Finding the NEIRR entry had nothing to do with you or your edits. ] was linked to within that entry in a manner lending notability to NEIRR. I will be honest with you about the fact the creation of and defense of those entries is troubling for a variety of reasons related to the general disregard of Misplaced Pages content guidelines due to what appears to be a well known agenda of yours and this did in fact lead me to look at your contribution history and take interest in a related topic -- the very same you just asked me about. If that is actionable then like I said ] is that way, but for the love of God stop harassing me. I'm not on your talk page asking you about your edits or your motivations am I? I'm at content areas arguing about the content. I suggest you do the same.] (]) 17:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:06, 14 December 2009
Apology
My comments lately to you have been a bit brusque, and I want to apologize for that. I am sorry, Cirt (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry
- Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Prior to my edit at that article two hours prior to yours, you had never edited it before. Curious how you came by this page and reverted my edit there? Cirt (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- I did not revert your edit ... I corrected what seemed to be a mistake. You removed a recent PROD but you also removed a notability tag along with it. That tag has been up for years and notability has not been established in the entry. As to your curiosity don't you have better things to do? Maybe we can discuss my semi-retired tag again as well while we're at it. You should concern yourself with editing the encyclopedia and doing so with care and not with why an editor has made his first edit to a page within a general subject area he's clearly interested in. Regards.PelleSmith (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is not an answer to my question. Cirt (talk) 16:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- No it is not. I don't need to answer your question and I find this, much like your comment about my tag, to be annoying. If you want to provide the diff of me editing that page in the future as evidence that I'm stalking your edits ... which is clearly what you're implying ... then be my guest. I really don't care what conclusions you want to draw from this. In the meantime stop harassing me with these personal questions, none of which have anything to do with improving the encyclopedia. Regards.PelleSmith (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- It is indeed a valid concern. You have shown up on at least three pages where you have previously never edited before, on articles I have either created or edited shortly before your arrival there. Cirt (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- WP:ANI is that way. Finding the NEIRR entry had nothing to do with you or your edits. Twisted Scriptures was linked to within that entry in a manner lending notability to NEIRR. I will be honest with you about the fact the creation of and defense of those entries is troubling for a variety of reasons related to the general disregard of Misplaced Pages content guidelines due to what appears to be a well known agenda of yours and this did in fact lead me to look at your contribution history and take interest in a related topic -- the very same you just asked me about. If that is actionable then like I said WP:ANI is that way, but for the love of God stop harassing me. I'm not on your talk page asking you about your edits or your motivations am I? I'm at content areas arguing about the content. I suggest you do the same.PelleSmith (talk) 17:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)