Misplaced Pages

User talk:Davrosz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:42, 4 January 2010 editMiesianiacal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,041 edits +  Revision as of 07:43, 4 January 2010 edit undoMiesianiacal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,041 edits →Republicanism in Australia: rewordNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Republicanism in Australia== ==Republicanism in Australia==
Hi. Please be aware that ] advises that personal points of view not be added to articles, such as you did at ]; it is only one opinion that the Queen of Australia is not an Australian, and to include it violates the neutral point of view policy. Also, please don't remove information that is sourced, add an edit summary so that other's may know what you're doing at a glance, and discuss controversial changes rather than reverting, per ]. Cheers. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">] ]</span> 07:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Hi. Please be aware that ] directs that personal points of view not be added to articles, such as you did at ]; it is only one opinion that the Queen of Australia is not an Australian, and to include it violates the neutral point of view policy. Also, please don't remove information that is sourced, add an edit summary so that other's may know what you're doing at a glance, and discuss controversial changes rather than reverting, per ]. Cheers. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">] ]</span> 07:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:43, 4 January 2010

Republicanism in Australia

Hi. Please be aware that WP:NPOV directs that personal points of view not be added to articles, such as you did at Republicanism in Australia; it is only one opinion that the Queen of Australia is not an Australian, and to include it violates the neutral point of view policy. Also, please don't remove information that is sourced, add an edit summary so that other's may know what you're doing at a glance, and discuss controversial changes rather than reverting, per WP:BRD. Cheers. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 07:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)