User talk:Daedalus969: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:41, 17 January 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 17.← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:08, 17 January 2010 edit undoNiteshift36 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,779 edits →BLP issue: new sectionNext edit →
Line 55:		Line 55:
	*{{user5\|1=Generation Y-Not?}}		*{{user5\|1=Generation Y-Not?}}
	*{{user5\|1=Soda fan90}}		*{{user5\|1=Soda fan90}}

			== BLP issue ==

			You were involved in the BLP discussion about John Rosatti. I'm currently involved in a BLP debate that I think is very similar. In my case, there is a lurid, very contentious allegation based solely on something that a single author said in her book. She states it as fact (based on an anon source IIRC), not even an allegation. No other media source has even made the allegation, let alone repeated it as fact. This seems odd by itself, but when you consider that the subject is ], the CEO of Blackwater and far from being a media favorite, it becomes even more odd. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion here and telling me if you think I am off base? ] (]) 21:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:08, 17 January 2010

4:21 am, 22 January 2025 (PDT)

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.

When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:

Use a descriptive subject/headline
Use ] when mentioning users and pages
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section
Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date
Please also note that I have a problem with dropping things, but I am working on it, and have made progress.
If you are going to use {{talkback}} templates, date them, so they can be archived properly.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives

2007
December 15, 2007 – March 17, 2008

2008
March 17, 2008 – March 26, 2008 March 26, 2008 – March 31, 2008 March 31, 2008 – April 28, 2008 April 28, 2008 – May 5, 2008 May 5, 2008 – May 31, 2008 May 31, 2008 – July 17, 2008 July 17, 2008 – November 5, 2008

2009
November 5, 2008 – January 5, 2009 January 5, 2009 – February 27, 2009 February 27, 2009 – April 14, 2009 April 14, 2009 – May 22, 2009 May 22, 2009 – June 26, 2009 June 26, 2009 – September 4, 2009 September 4, 2009 – November 3, 2009

2010
November 3, 2009 – January 2, 2010 January 3, 2010 – March 14, 2010 March 14, 2010 – July 6, 2010 July 11, 2010 – Present

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Happy New Year

Dear Daedalus969,
I just wanted to wish you and your family a HAPPY NEW YEAR. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.Malke 2010

Sysop? you aren't?

Here I've thought you were a sysop all this time. I would be willing to nominate you if nec, it might not help you but I think highly of your particaption here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dæ dαlus 01:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Have me supporting you would certainly help. Afeterall, I contributed to your block. And haveing a person who would normally vote oppose do the opposite is always a good thing in RFA's.--Coldplay Expért 01:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I still don't think I'm ready.. it's too soon since my last conflict.— Dæ dαlus 01:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

But your last conflict would be void if the two people that you had a conflict with were supporting you! That would make people realize that your block was a mistake. If you do go up for an RFA, i'll be there to co-nom it. (Unless you don;t want me to)--Coldplay Expért 01:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

What you do is up to you, but I still don't think that that would really help matters. I was still uncivil, and your behavior does not excuse mine.— Dæ dαlus 01:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Alrigh. Well whenever you do go up for one. Don't hesitate to tell me.--Coldplay Expért 01:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Alright.— Dæ dαlus 01:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, me too. Let me know. :)Malke 2010 01:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 11 January 2010

From the editor: Call for writers

2009 in review: 2009 in Review

Books: New Book namespace created

News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more

In the news: Misplaced Pages in British schools, Hitler's Downfall meme, and more

Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Transaction Go

Done. Deleted per your request. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 15:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Wallflowers98 sock info

I noticed your reports at WP:AIV a little bit ago. I had an encounter earlier today with both of those users and several more on Full House. Here's the list. Dawnseeker2000 04:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

En7834 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Danteorange78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Generation Y-Not? (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Soda fan90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

BLP issue

You were involved in the BLP discussion about John Rosatti. I'm currently involved in a BLP debate that I think is very similar. In my case, there is a lurid, very contentious allegation based solely on something that a single author said in her book. She states it as fact (based on an anon source IIRC), not even an allegation. No other media source has even made the allegation, let alone repeated it as fact. This seems odd by itself, but when you consider that the subject is Erik Prince, the CEO of Blackwater and far from being a media favorite, it becomes even more odd. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion here and telling me if you think I am off base? Niteshift36 (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:41, 17 January 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 17.← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:08, 17 January 2010 edit undoNiteshift36 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,779 edits →BLP issue: new sectionNext edit →
Line 55:		Line 55:
	*{{user5\|1=Generation Y-Not?}}		*{{user5\|1=Generation Y-Not?}}
	*{{user5\|1=Soda fan90}}		*{{user5\|1=Soda fan90}}

			== BLP issue ==

			You were involved in the BLP discussion about John Rosatti. I'm currently involved in a BLP debate that I think is very similar. In my case, there is a lurid, very contentious allegation based solely on something that a single author said in her book. She states it as fact (based on an anon source IIRC), not even an allegation. No other media source has even made the allegation, let alone repeated it as fact. This seems odd by itself, but when you consider that the subject is ], the CEO of Blackwater and far from being a media favorite, it becomes even more odd. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion here and telling me if you think I am off base? ] (]) 21:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)