Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:15, 26 February 2010

Attention:Last edited: Last edited by:23:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC) FisherQueen (talk · contribs) This IP address, 91.55.97.142, is registered to Deutsche Telekom. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Place of origin: Preußisch Oldendorf, North Rhine – Westphalia, Germany.

A word of advice

Stop trolling around and waste our time. --Dave 20:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Why do you think I am a troll? --91.55.97.142 (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for 31 hours

Template:Z8 Nick-D (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

91.55.97.142 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Completely Bogus. I harassed nobody.

Decline reason:

It's not possible to evaluate this request without more context; if you decide to request unblock again, please include the name of your other Misplaced Pages account or accounts, or the other ip addresses you've been editing from. This ip is clearly continuing a disagreement that began elsewhere, but I don't know what that disagreement is. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

91.55.97.142 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I think my request for unblock is complete: There is simply no reason for the block. (Also please have a look at this page's history, the unblock template does not seem to cover links.) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think my request for unblock is complete: There is simply no reason for the block. (Also please have a look at this page's history, the unblock template does not seem to cover links.) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think my request for unblock is complete: There is simply no reason for the block. (Also please have a look at this page's history, the unblock template does not seem to cover links.) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Well, just based on this ip's contribution history, you appeared from nowhere and are at Misplaced Pages only to randomly attack a specific editor, so the block is certainly appropriate. If there's no other context, that just makes it a better block. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Here are my previous contributions: Special:Contributions/91.55.112.142

Please let me know if you disagree with one of my actions. --91.55.97.142 (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

No, I don't see anything that helps me understand your disagreement. You don't really explain it here, either. If you disagree with someone, it's hard for them to determine whether you're right or not if you don't explain yourself clearly. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, now I see- you were blocked when you were making lots of small, randomly disruptive edits for no obvious reason, and now you're blocked again for making vague hostile comments for no obvious reason. If I had to guess, I'd say you were just bored on a Friday and looking for someone else on Misplaced Pages to entertain you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock