Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Lareneg: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:31, 8 March 2010 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits →Evidence submitted by Biophys← Previous edit Revision as of 19:24, 9 March 2010 edit undoSpitfire (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,508 edits →Comments by accused parties: removing irrelevant personal attacks.Next edit →
Line 50: Line 50:
::re the IP vandal on my talk page: That was one IP. Don't know what second one he's talking about. And his message had nothing to do with Biophys. It was a personal attack against FPaS which I promptly removed. But I have no idea what that has to do with any of this. ] (]) 00:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC) ::re the IP vandal on my talk page: That was one IP. Don't know what second one he's talking about. And his message had nothing to do with Biophys. It was a personal attack against FPaS which I promptly removed. But I have no idea what that has to do with any of this. ] (]) 00:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


{{clerknote}} personal attacks by {{user|Saiga12}} redacted, regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 19:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

*You post on[REDACTED] terrorist PROPAGANDA! You provide terrorist websites from the Internet and defend them and you try to do something against the users who defend the articles from your shit.'''--Saiga 20:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Your lovely source provide things like this:

{{quote box|width=50%|align=left|
Mujahideen released a summary of military operations against Anglo-American invaders and Karzai puppets in Helmand for Saturday, February 13. According to these data, '''more than 50 US invaders have been killed''' or injured and '''16 US have been tanks destroyed on Saturday''' in separate incidents in Marjah, Garmsir, Nad Ali and Now Zad districts of the Helmand province.
'''Kavkaz Center'''}}
{{Clearleft}}

That's not TRUE that's surely not true and you know this but you post it.
Terrorist mouthpiece of Al-Qaeda.


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======

Revision as of 19:24, 9 March 2010

Lareneg

Lareneg (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lareneg/Archive.


Report date March 7 2010, 15:58 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Biophys

Very similar vandalism patterns with numbers, in the same or related articles. Please compare:

Saiga12 (talk · contribs):,,, See how he first adds word "dead" to the number of casualties , but then removes the number .

Lareneg (talk · contribs),, (this is probably an IP from Germany: )

ALRisala (talk · contribs)

Compare Ravenssx (talk · contribs) and Saiga12:

Synchronized edit waring at the same page, with the same edit summary: ,

Vandalizing the same talk page: ,

The user denied sockpuppetry: and also did this . All accounts above are essentially SPA.

I ask for checkuser because there could be more SPA accounts with similar vandalism patters but a small number of edits created to avoid detection.

It's noteworthy that Saiga12 (talk · contribs) came to my talk page almost simultaneously (40 minutes difference) with another sockpuppeteer, LokiiT (talk · contribs) (see his sockpuppet case). They both made very similar but highly unusual claims: and , thus demonstrating a similar behavior pattern. They both share similar POV, edit the same articles, and both created large numbers of secondary accounts with small numbers of edits. See for example, these two recent sequential edits in the same article by LokiiT and Saiga12: and . For other background information about LokiiT please see this: .

Two proxy accounts came to LokiiT talk page to support claims by him and Saiga12 about "terrorist supporters". First account blamed an uninvolved administrator of being a ""terrorist supporter" . The both were also concerned of my business. They were blocked for one and two years, respectively.

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Oh look, he's at it again . A note to whoever is going to deal with this: I feel this is nothing other than a personal attack against myself, given the recent dispute between Biophys and I, and the fact that the only similarity between myself and the other accused party is that we both have edits in Chechen war related articles. I urge you to do a usercheck on me, and then please read what I wrote in that first diff about Biophy's history of sock fishing against people he doesn't like.LokiiT (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
re the IP vandal on my talk page: That was one IP. Don't know what second one he's talking about. And his message had nothing to do with Biophys. It was a personal attack against FPaS which I promptly removed. But I have no idea what that has to do with any of this. LokiiT (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk note: personal attacks by Saiga12 (talk · contribs) redacted, regards, Spitfire 19:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Biophys (talk) 15:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lareneg: Difference between revisions Add topic