| Revision as of 02:52, 17 March 2010 editKtr101 (talk | contribs)104,342 edits →March 2010: responded to the user← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:28, 17 March 2010 edit undoKtr101 (talk | contribs)104,342 edits {{subst:uw-3rr}} ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ::The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. ] (]) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | ::The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. ] (]) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::I'm sorry for assuming that. Still, you should provide an edit summary. ] (]) 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | :::I'm sorry for assuming that. Still, you should provide an edit summary. ] (]) 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 03:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Your user name == | == Your user name == | ||
Revision as of 03:28, 17 March 2010
March 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at List of unusual deaths, you will be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I am going to revert your removal because you clearly don't want it there. There was consensus on the talk page for keeping it and I saw that you didn't agree with it being there. Doing this against a consensus is counterproductive. Please don't revert it as I will happily start a discussion on the talk page of the article with you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for assuming that. Still, you should provide an edit summary. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Your user name
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that your username, Hell Hawk, may not meet Misplaced Pages's username policy because it contains profanity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 02:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)