| Revision as of 08:11, 18 March 2010 editBidgee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,550 edits Final warning: Vandalism on Tiger Airways Australia. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:12, 18 March 2010 edit undoBidgee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,550 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Tiger Airways Australia. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ] This is the '''final warning''' you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to ]. If you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> ] (]) 08:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ] This is the '''final warning''' you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to ]. If you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> ] (]) 08:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 08:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | ||
Revision as of 08:12, 18 March 2010
March 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page Tiger Airways Australia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Tiger Airways Australia. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 05:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Tiger Airways Australia, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Bidgee (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Tiger Airways Australia. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 08:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tiger Airways Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 08:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.