Revision as of 04:54, 13 May 2010 edit98.248.59.58 (talk) Cat← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 23 May 2010 edit undoPAVA11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,030 edits →May 2010: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Blanking wikilinks == | == Blanking wikilinks == | ||
Any particular reason you have a problem with a wiki link? That seems like pushing a POV? Your Edit: ] (]) 04:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | Any particular reason you have a problem with a wiki link? That seems like pushing a POV? Your Edit: ] (]) 04:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== May 2010 == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 23:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:10, 23 May 2010
Blanking wikilinks
Any particular reason you have a problem with a wiki link? That seems like pushing a POV? Your Edit: 98.248.59.58 (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fort Hood shooting. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Grsz 23:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)