| Revision as of 14:30, 26 May 2010 editRuhrfisch (talk | contribs)Administrators52,174 edits →PR quirk: thanks for the explanation← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:51, 26 May 2010 edit undoRich Farmbrough (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors1,725,655 edits →ANI: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::Thanks - your explanation makes sense to me (and I am glad you thought all this through!). ] ''']''' 14:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks - your explanation makes sense to me (and I am glad you thought all this through!). ] ''']''' 14:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ANI == | |||
| Where? ''] ]'', 15:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 15:51, 26 May 2010
| m:User:CBM | Please leave new comments at the bottom of the page, using the "new section" button at the top of the page. I will respond on this page unless you request otherwise. |
Archives
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (military history) has been marked as a guideline
Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (military history) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has recently been edited to mark it as a guideline. This is an automated notice of the change (more information). -- VeblenBot (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Style guide no longer marked as a guideline
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Style guide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been edited so that it is no longer marked as a guideline. It was previously marked as a guideline. This is an automated notice of the change (more information). -- VeblenBot (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
PR quirk
Thought you might like to know that Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Carpal tunnel syndrome/archive1 was listed on the Talk:Carpal tunnel syndrome/to do page (instead of on Talk:Carpal tunnel syndrome), and as a result the bot was unable to archive the PR. I moved the PR notice from the to do page to the talk page and archived it. First time I can recall seeing that, so wanted to let you know, thanks as always for all your help, Ruhrfisch ><>° 11:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- This was intentional behavior when I programmed the bot. The bot normally removes the PR template from the article's talk page. If the PR template isn't there, the bot tries the ArticleHistory template. If that also isn't there, something is wrong, and the bot reports an error. If I turn off this double-check, the result in cases will be that the old PR template is never removed, and the talk page makes it appear that the peer review is still open. So I think it's better to report these as errors. — Carl (CBM · talk) 21:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks - your explanation makes sense to me (and I am glad you thought all this through!). Ruhrfisch ><>° 14:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Where? Rich Farmbrough, 15:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC).