| Revision as of 02:06, 24 January 2006 editPatabongo (talk | contribs)160 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 24 January 2006 edit undoHiding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,138 edits 3 revert rule at From HellNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| :With regards to being a "sock", try googling ''patabongo'', it's been my online username for longer than I care to remember. I have no idea who you are. ] 02:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | :With regards to being a "sock", try googling ''patabongo'', it's been my online username for longer than I care to remember. I have no idea who you are. ] 02:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Regarding ], you are in danger, if you haven't in spirit already, of breaking the 3 revert rule. I will assume good faith that you will attempt to broker a compromise, however, please note this is a clear warning that one more revert of the page will result in a block. ] ] 22:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 24 January 2006
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! --Actown 02:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
From Hell
Sorry, but when I remove POV from an article, it's rather obnoxious for you to call making the article more NPOV as putting POV into it... furthermore, reverting it and then labeling the change "minor" is an outright lie. And, by the way, whose sock are you? Showing up to make decptive comments like that and personal attacks from a newly registered user is might suspicious. DreamGuy 01:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- It was a revert, and was marked as such, and it was minor, and was marked as such. Your attack on Knight seemed a bit out-of-place in the article, so I checked your contributions and it turned out to be a regular theme.
- With regards to being a "sock", try googling patabongo, it's been my online username for longer than I care to remember. I have no idea who you are. Patabongo 02:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
WP:3RR
Regarding From Hell, you are in danger, if you haven't in spirit already, of breaking the 3 revert rule. I will assume good faith that you will attempt to broker a compromise, however, please note this is a clear warning that one more revert of the page will result in a block. Steve block talk 22:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)