Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chzz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:21, 27 June 2010 editCoercorash (talk | contribs)586 edits →I didn't started edit war: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 08:46, 27 June 2010 edit undoEditor182 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,053 edits Dispute closed.Next edit →
Line 72: Line 72:


:Hi, OlEnglish.You are being very rude with me and treating me like a vandal.What's the problem if I will collect information about different rights?I want to know about different rights so that I can make my self illegible for those rights.As, we had discussed, I am not going to apply for these rights now-a-days.I want to apply for these rights when I'm little bit experienced with Misplaced Pages.So, Stop treating me very rudely.] | ] 05:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC) :Hi, OlEnglish.You are being very rude with me and treating me like a vandal.What's the problem if I will collect information about different rights?I want to know about different rights so that I can make my self illegible for those rights.As, we had discussed, I am not going to apply for these rights now-a-days.I want to apply for these rights when I'm little bit experienced with Misplaced Pages.So, Stop treating me very rudely.] | ] 05:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
== Edit Warring ==
Hello, I thought I'd let you know that I maintain my Talk page like an email inbox, when I receive a message and read it, or a discussion is over, I clear the page and leave the "blank" message so people know why. Otherwise there's too much clutter, so I don't mean it to be taken in any other respect. I also wasn't sure if the warning on edit warring was an automated response or that you may have wanted to get back to me. Regarding the edit warring however, an article ban on ] (]) may be required as they refuse to accept that their images aren't suitable or a contribution to ] or ].

When I have disagreements with other users, I either seek the opinion of a third established user who has experience with the topic of the article, compromise or accept the decision. This particular user is beyond reason, claiming that ] (]) is my "puppet", because this user also reverted the two edits in dispute on both articles. I have never communicated with this user, and the comment is preposterous. Sertraline is a featured article, which makes the warring more unacceptable, but ] (]) refuses to accept the consensus of others. I have also notified ] (]) that the user is persisting to revert edits when two users (including myself) disagree with the images being suitable or a contribution to the articles based on their non-English context and the presence of other suitable images. ] (]) has their own interests at heart, not the quality of articles. ] (]) 01:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

:The other user may well be doing wrong too, but that is not the point at all; I see no ] for the edit on ].

:My message was partly a template, but only because the template text says exactly what I meant;

:'''...users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors.''' Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. '''If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice.'''

:The remainder was my own, 'hand-written' advice;

::"] - why not ], have ], do not ]. ], it does not matter if it is the ] for a bit. If it's a content dispute, it can be resolved through ]. If others are not ], we can ]"

:As long as you have read, understood and acted upon the warning, then of course you are perfectly at liberty to blank your user talk page. If you have any questions, please let me know. Best wishes, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 03:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the reply. Thus far there is one other user on the sertraline page who has given their opinion against the image, but I'm not sure how far it has to go. I'm about to give up on this one, but it's a shame that an edit warring can allow a user to keep their revision in place even when it's 2 against 1, or in the case of the sertraline article, 3 against 1, and a dispute process has to be fulfilled. I was under the impression that an administrator could review the issue and decide which edit is more suitable and end it there. It's nothing major, though. ] (]) 03:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


==Question== ==Question==

Revision as of 08:46, 27 June 2010

Leave me a message
Emergency block button
Emergency block button
Emergency Misplaced Pages shutdown
Emergency block button
Emergency block button

DO NOT PRESS

Where has my message gone?
My talkpage is very active, so please check the archives.
Put your user name or article name into this box, and 'search'-----→
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35

Notes to self   
PRODlog  · CSDlog

WP:RFA  · WT:RFA  · WP:AN  · WP:ANI CAT:AFC

Notes

Periodic Detention

Bots; 
I'm gonna strip the AFC page - remove the {{AFC submission...}} and the <!-- comment> stuff and the auto-reference part, and see what is left, and if it looks anything like an article
 <@Chzz> also, gonna be able to advise people if they ONLY put refs UNDER ==References==
 <@Chzz> but...yeah; that is on the long to-do-list
 <@Chzz> am just trying to get less "false positives", but miss less who do need ref-help
 <@Chzz> am also gonna check number-of-edits, and not give any help on e.g. >50 edits
 <@Chzz> and I'm gonna fix the sandbox-cleaner so it clears more 'sandbox' pages, in tutorials and talks
 <@Chzz> and fix the stalkbot up
 <@Chzz> and add another stalkbot that actually checks the diff
 <@Chzz> (which thus becomes as powerful as 'edit filter')
 <@Chzz> then I just need to install the "laser beam" and we're good to go
WT:ACN

Keegs, emails, H

CB

stuff

idk


q


Extended content

demo: http://helpmebot.org.uk/User:Chzz/cem

<Shearonink> 1) can you crop the images into A)Each individual RAISIN panel B) Both RAISIN panels

-> Commons 

 <Chzz> you don't want the "Buena Vista" then?
 <Shearonink> no
 <Chzz> just the 2x "Raison"   rite?
 <Shearonink> yes
 <Chzz> c-c-c-combo, and split into two
 <Chzz> and looking good at thumb size 
 <Chzz> do you like it 'straightened'   - like I did on that demo?
 <Chzz> ie I 'distorted' the pic, to make it 'straight'
 <Shearonink> yes
 <Chzz> yep, ok
 <Shearonink> yes I noticed it was crokked in the version gene upcloaded
 <Chzz> and I'll fiddle with the colour/light balance, to make it as clear as poss without it looking bizarre
I also work for Misplaced Pages, and had a rather scary email recently: "Before you edit a banner or update some code, just remember that if our readership was a country it would be the 3rd largest country in the world."



IP warns

SELECT SUM(single) FROM (select cl_sortkey,COUNT(*) as single from categorylinks LEFT JOIN recentchanges ON cl_sortkey=rc_user_text where rc_timestamp>"201110XX202500" AND cl_to="Wikipedia_user_talk_pages_of_shared_IP_addresses" GROUP BY cl_sortkey HAVING cl_sortkey RLIKE "^{1,3}\.{1,3}\.{1,3}\.{1,3}$") as dummy; XX=day


That

  • Bad example of canvassing on DRV apology

Tech

other places

stuff to add to

Extended content

Those that are included in this classification

Extended content
  • Sandbox essay about[REDACTED] by ip
  • <Chzz> !editcount Dance With The Devil <Helpmebot> The edit count of User:Dance With The Devil is 666
  • New admins: 2007, 408; in 2008, 201; in 2009, 119; in 2010, 75 signpost RFA by month
  • kimbo AFC decline
  • 'clear the air' meobs @10:19

"If people would stop getting offended by words that are just words, all this retarded shit wouldn't be so gay."

☠Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge's Taxonomy

Misplaced Pages:Successful_requests_for_adminship

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology/Archive_3#Dulcis_foetidus Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Dulcis_foetidus Cody primavera (talk · contribs)

Ongoing/longterm

Outreach/Amb/Guide

User:Chzz/l1

irc

Checkback

Riks *Chrisr121 (talk · contribs)  ·  Ricko22 (talk · contribs)  ·  Bensamuels (talk · contribs)  ·  Freddieengels (talk · contribs)

---

Prob given up on


File:PiratesVsTemp English.jpg

As ur daughter ...

Thanks for the help, again. Did u adopt me as a nubilian princess editor? Bridgetttttttebabble 12:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hiya! Well, I do not go in for the official 'adoption' programme (I'm afraid of the poop!) but I am always happy to try and help anyone, as best I can. So, if you ever need help with anything, feel free to ask me, right here. Cheers!  Chzz  ►  12:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Beach Nourishment COI Edit

Hey Chzz, thanks for your comments on my edit on the discussion page of the "Beach Nourishment" entry on Misplaced Pages. I made some revisions and created a user-space draft like you asked. Could you review it for me and provide some feedback? http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Weissmax25/Beach_Nourishment

Thanks.

Weissmax25 (talk) 19:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi. the proposed article still has a number of problems. Per WP:COI, I suggest that you edit other articles instead.
Issues with the proposal include (but are not limited to);
  • three commonly accepted methods - accorting to whom? (see WP:V)
  • All three of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages - according to whom?
  • However, no one solution can be applied in all situations. - according to whom?
  • This article concentrates on... - meta-information; this is not encyclopaedic. Just state facts.
  • Re. section "Response Alternatives On An Eroding Beach" - this offers a biased view, opinion, not fact. For example,
There is a growing body of evidence - where? Prove that it is 'growing'.
nearshore breakwaters, if filled with sand, will not have a negative impacts on the littoral drift system. - according to perhaps that one source. Do others disagree?
Problems with vague terms, per WP:WEASEL, WP:PEACOCK etc. - Managed Retreat - A second option is retreat as the shoreline erodes. This option has been exercised very infrequently along the United States shoreline; however, a number of examples exist. Retreat the most appropriate option in areas of high erosion and in the presence of small economic revenue base. Many, but not all areas of high erosion are due to human activities.
  • And so it goes on. "Sand or “Borrow” Sources" says, source of suitable material for a particular project depends upon... - opinion, not fact.
  • The most important borrow material characteristic is ditto

I hope this gives some indication of the problems with conflict of interest. I highly recommend editing other articles. Best,  Chzz  ►  02:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Question About Submitting Draft

(Loreensherman (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)). Hi Chzz, thanks for your advice about posting on Misplaced Pages. I certainly want to stay within Misplaced Pages's parameters and guidelines. I am confused because my article for Formulaic Communication in the 21st Century was moved to another talk page under a draft... Uncertain as to what that means. Please explain. (Loreensherman (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)).

On 21 June, you first created Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics - that is still there; it is a 'declined' submission, but that does not preclude further edits, and asking us to re-check it.
It would appear that you created an article re. "Continual Progression of Entrepreneurism" on your user talk page, and I then moved that to a subpage - that is now in User talk:Loreensherman/draft one, which you have edited and resubmitted here. Most of that article did not display, because of the incorrect reference format, which I have just fixed, here. It still, currently, contains almost entirely quoted material, rather than encyclopaedic fact; please do read other articles for ideas, as suggested on your talk page, and ask for a further review when it is more appropriate. Best,  Chzz  ►  03:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Chzz, It's time to become an Administrator

Chzz, do it! And please don't give me past viewpoints and stuff..... ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ 13:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Honestly? It might be a little too soon yet.. but I'd say he does have a fairly good chance at succeeding at this point. But it could be a little risky.. -- œ 01:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Agreed; a meer 15,000 non-auto drama-free edits, it's far too soon to think about. Chzz  ►  03:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Chzz, man, sarcasm aside - just go ahead now. There are admins and there are admins, and there should be you now. You've done the call duty already. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ 03:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Your rights.

MaxViwe, we chatted about this when you emailed me remember? Instead of trying to collect rights for yourself that you don't even need, try focusing on editing articles instead. -- œ 01:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, OlEnglish.
I was going to write more of an explanation here, but in light of the above, I merely suggest that full details of these rights are avaialble at Misplaced Pages:Edit filter and Misplaced Pages:Account creator.  Chzz  ►  03:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, OlEnglish.You are being very rude with me and treating me like a vandal.What's the problem if I will collect information about different rights?I want to know about different rights so that I can make my self illegible for those rights.As, we had discussed, I am not going to apply for these rights now-a-days.I want to apply for these rights when I'm little bit experienced with Misplaced Pages.So, Stop treating me very rudely.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 05:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Question

I didn't started edit war

It were User:Urduboy and User:MatthewVanitas,so called neutral editors,who started the edit-war. That made me quote this:


IF majority of online users (2us1) can decide the truth in real world than it means that The day of Judgement IS NEAR.


Coercorash 07:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Chzz: Difference between revisions Add topic