Revision as of 04:11, 27 July 2010 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 26 July 2010: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:48, 27 July 2010 edit undoDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits Unblocked - but be warned.Next edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:We've got your e-mail and are discussing it. --] ] 17:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | :We've got your e-mail and are discussing it. --] ] 17:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks. I look forward to the results and have appreciated the thoughtful correspondence with Brandon. ]<u>]</u> 21:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks. I look forward to the results and have appreciated the thoughtful correspondence with Brandon. ]<u>]</u> 21:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I have unblocked you. Given the situation as a whole, your explanation for the technical data we have is plausible (if unverifiable). But be warned, any further suspicious behaviour from your IPs will result in an immidiate indefinite block. --] ] 07:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 26 July 2010 == | == ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 26 July 2010 == |
Revision as of 07:48, 27 July 2010
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Welcome to my talk page, go Cubbies, da Bears and da Bulls! You must be thinking... what about the Blackhawks? Hockey is the only sport I didn't play growing up, never was good at skating or rollerblading. Apologies if I have somehow offended you during discussions. I am rather blunt in real life, sometimes my wikipersona follows suit. Really, nothing personal. Please feel free to post a message below. I'll be happy to respond at my earliest convenience (which may be 30 seconds later, don't freak out).
Blocked
Misplaced Pages's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Brandon (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
ThinkEnemies (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Shared IP address resulted in block. †TE†Talk 18:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Checkuser block, which reveals a large number of accounts operated by you. You can, if you wish, e-mail the blocking admin. No-one else will unblock you.--Anthony.bradbury 20:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yeah, I figured as much. I'm just going through the motions now and emailed Brandon around the time I requested the unblock. Having my editing privileges returned could make it easier to get this cleared up, though. †TE†Talk 23:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- We've got your e-mail and are discussing it. --Deskana (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I look forward to the results and have appreciated the thoughtful correspondence with Brandon. †TE†Talk 21:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have unblocked you. Given the situation as a whole, your explanation for the technical data we have is plausible (if unverifiable). But be warned, any further suspicious behaviour from your IPs will result in an immidiate indefinite block. --Deskana (talk) 07:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I look forward to the results and have appreciated the thoughtful correspondence with Brandon. †TE†Talk 21:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News