Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:43, 31 July 2010

Archive 1 12/2008 01/2009 02/2009 03/2009 04/2009 05/2009 06/2009 07/2009 09/2009 10/2009 11/2009 12/2009 cfwar 01/2010 02/2010 03/2010 04/2010 05/2010 06/2010 07/2010 08/2010 09/2010 10/2010 11/2010 12/2010 02/2011 03/2011 04/2011 05/2011 09/2011 10/2011 11/2011 12/2011 01/2012 02/2012 03/2012 04/2012 05/2012 06/2012 07/2012 08/2012 09/2012 10/2012 11/2012 12/2012 01/2013 02/2013 03/2013 04/2013 05/2013 06/2013 01/2014 02/2014 04/2014 05/2014 06/2014 GGsockfarms 12/2014 01/2015 02/2015 03/2015 04/2015 07/2015 11/2015 01/2016 11/2016 02/2017 10/2017 12/2017 11/2018 08/2020 11/2020 04/2021 05/2021 06/2021 07/2021 08/2021 09/2021 10/2021 11/2021 12/2021 01/2022 02/2022 03/2022 04/2022 05/2022 06/2022 07/2022 08/2022 09/2022 10/2022 11/2022 12/2022 01/2023 02/2023 03/2023 04/2023 05/2023 06/2023 07/2023 08/2023 09/2023 11/2023 05/2024 Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

good move

I didn't have the bollocks to move Lar's edit myself. Good thinking. Polargeo (talk) 12:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

hat/hab etc

Hello - I noticed you changed my use of {{discussion top}} to {{hat}} etc. That's absolutely fine - I was going to use hat/hab per clear earlier procedure but I saw a hidden comment saying when discussion top/bottom should be used and so used that instead. If it's always to be hat/hab perhaps the hidden comment should also be removed? CIreland (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

It should. I will. Hipocrite (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I moved the hat/hab comment first and made a note that it's almost always preferred to use it instead of discussion top... if discussion top should be removed entirely? dunno. Not clear to me one way or the other. ++Lar: t/c 17:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Concerned

All I was doing was stating that it has been criticised at RealClimate. That is a fact, backed up with a reference. It is a very popular blog, considered important enough to have a wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASmartKid (talk • contribs) 21:30, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Censored!

AARRGGGH. Yet, why has Snotty Wong not been censored for calling members of the Article Rescue Squadron "lazy" and continuing to imply that they undermine the project by using the rescue tag for improper purposes. My outburst was inappropriate but much less insidious.--Milowent • 21:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

"Lazy" is not as blatent as "douchebag." Be the bigger man. Hipocrite (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I fully support your removal. Lazy, especially in the way it was used, is not uncivil. Verbal chat 21:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Duchamp apparently has messy hair...

Bring the issue up at ANI. At this point, some level of banning discussion is necessary. If you start the discussion, I will chime there... --Jayron32 03:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Pov tag on "Climate Research Unit email controversy"

You placed the tag on 7/16, and there is currently a discussion underway as to whether it is still warranted. If you feel it is, can you please explain the problem, and if not, can you remove? Thanks. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Probably (hopefully) out enjoying his weekend. I'd give him till 7/27 or so, it is vacation season after all. That reminds me, why the hell am I not on vacation!? Arkon (talk) 18:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Derek Smart Surrogate

Hipocrite, I don't know who I can go to. Since I no longer have an account that I can edit articles or talk page articles. An editor that is apparently another Derek Smart surrogate has edited a BLP, David_Allen_(game_designer) with what I consider problematic edits. Mr. Smart is currently involved in a civil suit with Mr. Allen. The David Allen article appears to me to contain multiple violations of policy violations. Derek Smart surrogates have been problematic in the past, something near a half dozen accounts banned. I suggest that semi-protecting the David Allen article may be considered. I would really appreciate attention to this matter. Thank you, Bill Huffman (talk) 03:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Bill, I thought you had promised ArbCom that you would stay away from Derek Smart in Misplaced Pages because of your ongoing off-wiki feud with him. Cla68 (talk) 04:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I am asking for help on the David Allen article. BTW, on SirFozzie's talk page you have another opportunity to explain why you told ArbCom that brazen total lie about me. Bill Huffman (talk) 04:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Hipocrite, in case you aren't aware of it, Mr. Huffman runs a website dedicated to criticizing Derek Smart. Cla68 (talk) 04:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Cla68, you made this inaccurate statement before. The more accurate description, I believe is that the website is dedicated to documenting the Derek Smart flame war follies. In particular, those activities primarily focused on the Usenet portion of the Derek Smart flame war follies. Bill Huffman (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Hipocrite, I apologize for bringing this additional distraction to your doorstep. In case the miscommunication here is mine, the issue that I'm asking for assistance on is the David_Allen_(game_designer) article. I would appreciate it if you could take a look. An editor, Wildcard999, has edited this article and may be an editor that has been banned multiple times for disruptive editing. I notice that Orlady has very recently looked at the article. Thank you, Bill Huffman (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Once bitten, twice shy. I don't edit bios related to possibly litigious persons. Hipocrite (talk) 14:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the chuckle :-) Bill Huffman (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Monckton

Who's the aggrieved party you mentioned on SirFozzie's talk page? You don't mean SlimVirgin, do you? -- ChrisO (talk) 22:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

lol

Is it just me or do you share a sneaking suspicion that, lately, common logic is having to be spoon-fed to those who aren't much in the area of critical thinking? BigK HeX (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Policy based reasons for not using Climategate

Hi, just wondering if you've considered my 23:29, 29 July 2010 response to your 21:22, 29 July 2010 post at this page. Do we agree? Regards, --Yopienso (talk) 01:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Following people who have announced a desire to no longer deal with your vexatiousness to their talk page is highly problematic. Stop it. Hipocrite (talk) 02:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry--I missed or forgot your announcement. --Yopienso (talk) 02:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Deadly Serious???

Probably too strident. Try dialing back a little, please. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 03:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)