Revision as of 03:33, 15 August 2010 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,098 edits Unblock request declined.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:37, 15 August 2010 edit undoFrank Fascarelli (talk | contribs)61 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=I don't understand why I have been blocked.|decline=You're mass nominating articles for deletion and stalking/harassing ], not to mention posting similar unblock requests as the previously-blocked socks. Nice try, Torkmann. –] 03:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=I don't understand why I have been blocked.|decline=You're mass nominating articles for deletion and stalking/harassing ], not to mention posting similar unblock requests as the previously-blocked socks. Nice try, Torkmann. –] 03:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)}} | ||
{{unblock|Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Misplaced Pages a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be banned -- But just wait, I'm going to move to ] where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Misplaced Pages forever! His articles are total bollocks!}} |
Revision as of 03:37, 15 August 2010
First article I tried to edit was "MILF." I saw it being listed for deletion. I agree. Then I see others.
Hello? Frank Fascarelli (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC) ~ ~~ Frank Fascarelli (talk)
Cheek'd and others
Please be a little more careful and make sure to read relevant guidelines before going to overboard. Misplaced Pages:Notability. Also see WP:EL discussing external links. It is common to have the official link to the topic's website at the bottom of the article. You might be find m:Deletionism and m:Inclusionism interesting.Cptnono (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Just a note..
Edit summaries like this are strongly discouraged via the no personal attacks policy, and blocks are usually given for offenders. You may want to read it. Thank you and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Tommy! 02:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
evidence, anyone?
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Q 03:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't understand why I have been blocked.
Decline reason:
You're mass nominating articles for deletion and stalking/harassing User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), not to mention posting similar unblock requests as the previously-blocked socks. Nice try, Torkmann. –MuZemike 03:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Frank Fascarelli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Misplaced Pages a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be banned -- But just wait, I'm going to move to Cote d'Ivoire where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Misplaced Pages forever! His articles are total bollocks!Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Misplaced Pages a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be banned -- But just wait, I'm going to move to ] where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Misplaced Pages forever! His articles are total bollocks! |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Misplaced Pages a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be banned -- But just wait, I'm going to move to ] where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Misplaced Pages forever! His articles are total bollocks! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, all I'm trying to do is clean up Misplaced Pages a bit. Sometimes one has to separate the wheat from the proverbial chaff. I might be banned -- But just wait, I'm going to move to ] where my IP cannot be traced, make a bunch of legit edits, become an administrator, and ban that ass-hat Richard Norton from Misplaced Pages forever! His articles are total bollocks! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}