| Revision as of 11:36, 18 August 2010 editWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 edits →Comments by other users: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:29, 18 August 2010 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,095 edits Marking as closed. No further action needed.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
| {{decline}} – To me, it's pretty clear that these IPs are Johnny Spasm; no CU needed. Otherwise, go forward with ] or a ban discussion at ] (not ANI, please I beg you) if necessary. –] 19:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 18 August 2010
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Johnny Spasm
Johnny Spasm (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Spasm/Archive.
16 August 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- 216.229.167.71 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 71.3.20.47 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
Evidence submitted by Wknight94
Pretty obvious block evasion by Johnny Spasm (talk · contribs) who was blocked for three months - his 5th block for various forms of disruption. 71.3.20.47 basically admitted it by trying to blank Johnny Spasm's pages, but then the IP started editing so I blocked it. Now 216.229.167.71 is making almost the same edits so I blocked it as well. Are there other socks? Can we hard-block them for a while? Thanks. Wknight94 16:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
- If Johnny Spasm is 216.229.167.71, I support an permanent ban from Misplaced Pages, per this edit on August 16 where he commits the exact act that got him blocked for three months in the first place, senselessly blanking 80% of a well-sourced article. He has exhibited that he will never learn from his mistakes, and continues evading his blocks to disrupt Misplaced Pages. Three months is not enough. Blocking is not enough. This user needs to be permanently banned from editing. Vodello (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Permanent ban. Concur w/Vodello, for reasons he stated. Socking on top of rampant disruption? Just the sort of thing that drives good editors away from the project, and eats up its resources and skews its results. Now I better understand why he was so cavalier about being blocked, at the time, saying "whatever. I really don't care", and that he wasn't asking to have his three months reduced.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- A ban proposal would have to be made at WP:AN (or maybe WP:ANI?) Wknight94 11:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Clerk declined – To me, it's pretty clear that these IPs are Johnny Spasm; no CU needed. Otherwise, go forward with WP:RFC/U or a ban discussion at WP:AN (not ANI, please I beg you) if necessary. –MuZemike 19:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories: