Misplaced Pages

User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:36, 1 October 2010 editKafziel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,921 edits block message← Previous edit Revision as of 19:38, 1 October 2010 edit undoPostdlf (talk | contribs)Administrators91,194 edits →Harassment warning: unblocked; admin conflict of interestNext edit →
Line 79: Line 79:


] '''You have now been blocked for 24 hours for persistent harassment and baiting in violation of ]. , in particular. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC) ] '''You have now been blocked for 24 hours for persistent harassment and baiting in violation of ]. , in particular. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
:Without any judgment on his conduct, I've unblocked ] because it's simply unacceptable for an admin to block someone because of their personal conflict with him. Kafziel, if you think his conduct ''regarding you'' merits a block, post it on ] for an ''uninvolved'' admin to address. ''']''' ('']'') 19:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:38, 1 October 2010

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Silly pissing match over anonymously quoting another editor

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Silly pissing match over anonymously quoting another editor |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Silly pissing match over anonymously quoting another editor |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Silly pissing match over anonymously quoting another editor |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi! welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

My wikistalkers

I have a sneaking suspicion that they are either the same person or working together. Most of their contributions appear to be nominating articles that I start.


As it turned out the two were the same along with a third. I am sure there are more. All three personas nominated the same article and the accounts were banned from editing.

New articles to start

Deletion reviews

May I respectfully ask why you sometimes nominate articles for deletion review because you disagree with the closure and without discussing the matter with the closing administrator? Stifle (talk) 08:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

William Weightman

Saw your edit. How do you know about him?Malke 2010 (talk) 01:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Through his daughter's husband. I found his photo at the library of congress, and wrote an article on him, now I found a photos of his grandson:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/4037482990

Well then, hello cousin. My great-grandmother on my mum's side is a Weightman. A cousin. Cool. We need to add the bit about his donation to the University of Pennsylvania. Weightman donated the money to Penn and they built the famous field house with it and called it Weightman Hall.Malke 2010 (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Billiards project invite

Given your recent three-cushion activity, you probably want to join WP:CUE.  :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 12:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Harold Worst

Deleted revision of Harold Worst as of 18 August 2007

{{Wikify|date=August 2007}} HAROLD WORST of Grand Rapids, Michigan was only 19 years old when he played the great Willie Hoppe, winner of 51 major billiard championships, in a demonstration game in Detroit in 1949. Hoppe soon took an interest in Worst's playing potential, and under his guidance, Worst won the world title for three-cushion billiards in Argentina in 1954, the youngest player to compete in world competition. He successfully defended this title for many years. Equally skilled at pocket billiards, Worst dominated play to win the All-Around titles in both the 1965 Johnston City, IL and 1965 Stardust Open championships. {{Unreferenced|date=August 2007}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Worst, Harold}} ]

Cheers, --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

William James Wanless

Thanks for your comments and edits on William James Wanless. Finally the AFD tag is removed, can you plz help me to Nominate this article to DYK, as I honestly do not Understood how do it. Plz help-- . Shlok talk . 10:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

HA!, I see what you mean, I haven't a clue where to paste the template, I will ask a guy to help over the weekend. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


Harassment warning

I warned you about incivility; harassment such as this will not be tolerated. If you think I have to put up with it just because we interacted on an Afd, you are very much mistaken. Consider this your final warning. Kafziel 19:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I am always civil. If you don't want your writings quoted, don't express them in a public forum. If your embarrassed to see your writings repeated, don't released them under a free license. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

You have now been blocked for 24 hours for persistent harassment and baiting in violation of WP:CIVIL. This edit, in particular. Kafziel 19:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Without any judgment on his conduct, I've unblocked User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) because it's simply unacceptable for an admin to block someone because of their personal conflict with him. Kafziel, if you think his conduct regarding you merits a block, post it on WP:ANI for an uninvolved admin to address. postdlf (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Difference between revisions Add topic