| Revision as of 16:15, 3 October 2010 editIntgr (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers32,254 edits →Notice about TrueCrypt← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:35, 4 October 2010 edit undoQuietbritishjim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,602 edits →Notice about TrueCryptNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| I will also note that the "external links" guideline is named as such '''because it applies to external links''', not article content — and the linked articles do not ''contain'' malware — they ''talk about'' it. Do you think the whole ] article should also be deleted? -- ] <small>]]</small> 16:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC) | I will also note that the "external links" guideline is named as such '''because it applies to external links''', not article content — and the linked articles do not ''contain'' malware — they ''talk about'' it. Do you think the whole ] article should also be deleted? -- ] <small>]]</small> 16:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Please see ] (the three revert rule policy). It seems you have deleted valid article content a good six or seven times (I can't be bothered to check your destructive edits in detail - there are so many of them!). I think it's pretty clear you're in violation of this rule, which counts as implicit vandalism. Please stop! ] (]) 16:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:35, 4 October 2010
October 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at TrueCrypt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nuwewsco (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at TrueCrypt, you may be blocked from editing. Nuwewsco (talk) 15:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Notice about TrueCrypt
If you actually want to improve the TrueCrypt article then create a talk page section on Talk:TrueCrypt and we can discuss it. Don't expect to have an intelligible conversation in edit comments in the middle of an edit war. If you continue edit warring then you will be banned, without making any progress and after wasting your own time and several other person's.
I will also note that the "external links" guideline is named as such because it applies to external links, not article content — and the linked articles do not contain malware — they talk about it. Do you think the whole malware article should also be deleted? -- intgr 16:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see WP:3RR (the three revert rule policy). It seems you have deleted valid article content a good six or seven times (I can't be bothered to check your destructive edits in detail - there are so many of them!). I think it's pretty clear you're in violation of this rule, which counts as implicit vandalism. Please stop! Quietbritishjim (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)