| Revision as of 09:48, 8 October 2010 editTikiwont (talk | contribs)31,783 edits Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:49, 8 October 2010 edit undoTeleComNasSprVen (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,323 edits yes, thank youNext edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| Thanks. I really, really hate Huggle from time to time. ] (]) 04:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | Thanks. I really, really hate Huggle from time to time. ] (]) 04:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :No problem. ]]] 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | :No problem. ]]] 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | |||
| Hello TeleComNasSprVen, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''somebody thought this is a plausible typo. Please bring to RFD or explain what you want to merge or move here.''' You may wish to review the ] before tagging further pages. Thank you. ] (]) 09:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:49, 8 October 2010
 "Previous stuff" | |
|
|
|
Status: Unknown 
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
OMG! It's RickK: [[ User:RickK
Note: I've become more interested in writing Misplaced Pages policy than I am in writing articles.
Anything else goes below this line.
October 2010
WP:WWF/D/2010/O
Would you like to join in the fun of wikifying pages at our wikification drive? Barnstars will be handed out to participants. WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • shot down) 00:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
NPD
You marked quite a few images one week ago today at {{npd}}. Many of these images are marked pd-self (e.g., ), with no compelling reason to mark as npd. May I ask you to be more careful in your image tagging? Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
In fact, today alone on patrol I had to remove 9 ( ) {{subst:npd}} mistaggings of yours on images. Out of those, 3 of those might be considered unfree due to being a derivative work - really they should be going through WP:PUF, as they're not clear-cut cases - but the rest are just inexplicable. Just as bad, not a single npd edit you made was actually valid - none of them were deletable. This not only creates more work for us as administrators, but is rather WP:BITEy towards our users. Please consider being more careful with Twinkle - I do warn you that other users have had their right to use it revoked in the past for being too hasty with it.
Apologies if this message is harsh but hopefully you understand the need for it. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
HareKrishnaPortal
I see, that wikipedia is mostly atheistic. So what should I do? Wait till atheists kill whole world??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.108.252 (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
User:Abdullah a khoshaim
Is "unreadable" a good justification for requesting speedy deletion of a user page in Arabic? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Files that you tagged
Sorry, but if a source is valid at one time, it is always valid for the purposes of this criterion. It's vaguely like print sources: unless we have good reason to believe otherwise, we assume good faith on the part of the uploader. Alternatively, think of rotten links as sources for content: as long as they're properly sourced, with access dates, all style guides accept them as valid. Even if you have good reason to believe that the uploader didn't follow policy, do not edit image descriptions as you did: sources are provided, and removal of them is disruptive. If you find an image whose rotten link you don't trust to have contained the permission that is claimed, you should take it to FFD. Nyttend (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion tag: User:Levani1980
Hi TeleComNasSprVen! Firstly, thanks for helping out in CSD areas. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on User:Levani1980- because: blanking is not taken as a deletion request in the userspace. If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks Kingpin (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion, again
I see you mistagged the above image again. I'll overlook the fact that WP:CSD#F1 doesn't apply to images on commons, and assume you meant F8 - but the images aren't even of the same tint. Please slow down TCNSV, your talk page is littered with requests to review CSD better and slow down. If you don't, we may have to remove your ability to use Twinkle at all (yes, we can do that). Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I believe that was established after the fact. In any case, if it is that important, I might as well bring it to FfD sometime; I cannot see any mention currently of the tint of the picture having a bearing on the csd criteria. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The wording states Images available as identical copies on the Wikimedia Commons (or higher quality/resolution). The previous wording I suppose was clearer: "bit for bit copy". Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
User talk:69.181.249.92 (2)
Thanks. I really, really hate Huggle from time to time. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)