| Revision as of 11:33, 20 October 2010 view sourceGiacomoReturned (talk | contribs)Rollbackers11,926 edits →Stay off my page!← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:45, 20 October 2010 view source Kingpin13 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators54,922 edits →Stay off my page!: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
| :Giano, if you start purposely annoying TreasuryTag simply because they comment about you, you will be blocked. Do '''not''' think you can prevent editors who are likely to have conflicting views from commenting on your actions, by threatening to harass them if they do so. That said, you are entitled to remove TreasuryTag's comments from ''your own'' talk page (TreasuryTag, best not to complain if this happens). If the comment's are problematic they can be dealt with, using means other then attacking TreasuryTag. - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 11:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | :Giano, if you start purposely annoying TreasuryTag simply because they comment about you, you will be blocked. Do '''not''' think you can prevent editors who are likely to have conflicting views from commenting on your actions, by threatening to harass them if they do so. That said, you are entitled to remove TreasuryTag's comments from ''your own'' talk page (TreasuryTag, best not to complain if this happens). If the comment's are problematic they can be dealt with, using means other then attacking TreasuryTag. - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 11:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::I have no intention at all of attacking Treasure Tag - I merely ask him to stay away from me. I feel this will be beneficial to all, and will assist the peace and harmony of the project. I point out that I am more than happy to extend the same courtesy to him. That's all. Please do not misconstrue. I wish it to be very clear exactly what I mean. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ::I have no intention at all of attacking Treasure Tag - I merely ask him to stay away from me. I feel this will be beneficial to all, and will assist the peace and harmony of the project. I point out that I am more than happy to extend the same courtesy to him. That's all. Please do not misconstrue. I wish it to be very clear exactly what I mean. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::I think you make yourself rather clear . By attack I mean come to TreasuryTag's page with the intent of making his editing of Misplaced Pages unpleasant (in violation of ]). Threatening to do this is also a violation of harass, FYI - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 11:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:45, 20 October 2010
|
TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Misplaced Pages, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
Just to fix the formatting...
Lime
Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
Whys
Because of WP:BRD. When there is disagreement about an issue we restore things to where there were before the bold change and then discuss. In theory the person making the bold change should initiate the discussion. Instead you three edit warred without discussion. You all know better. I set us back to the state we started in before your bold change and initiated discussion--exactly what should have happened to begin with. Hobit (talk) 12:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- So you basically decided to make the 8th revert on a page while simultaneously lecturing others about the evils of revert-warring. What hypocrisy. ╟─TreasuryTag►person of reasonable firmness─╢ 16:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Misplaced Pages, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
File:Flag of the African Union 2010.svg
Hi,
concerning File:Flag of the African Union 2010.svg, as far as I'm aware F4 doesn't apply to fair-use images. A source in particular is not particularly relevant as long as the rationale is valid – quite regularly the source of a fair use image is actually unknown.
Cheers, Amalthea 18:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Any comment? Amalthea 18:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I've restored it, less your tag. And I'm confused that you're ignoring me. Amalthea 11:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
Your change to a section title
This edit broke the section link that shows up on people's watchlists. Please be more careful about that sort of thing in future. --Viennese Waltz 17:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- I make no apology for enforcing WP:TALK#markup. Please be more conservative in dishing out brusque comments to people! ╟─TreasuryTag►Lord Speaker─╢ 17:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Stay off my page!
Sometime ago you were asked to leave me alone . Yesterday, uninvited, you chose to twice ignore that request and post on my page and comment on me in matter which did not concern you. I am more than happy to maintain a very great distance between us. In future, if you comment about me anywhere, post on my page or go out of your way to irritate me (on or off site), then I will not consider myself bound to abide by that same agreement. I hope that is very clearly understood. I hope I will not have to post on this page ever again. Is that quite clear? Giacomo 11:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Giano, if you start purposely annoying TreasuryTag simply because they comment about you, you will be blocked. Do not think you can prevent editors who are likely to have conflicting views from commenting on your actions, by threatening to harass them if they do so. That said, you are entitled to remove TreasuryTag's comments from your own talk page (TreasuryTag, best not to complain if this happens). If the comment's are problematic they can be dealt with, using means other then attacking TreasuryTag. - Kingpin (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have no intention at all of attacking Treasure Tag - I merely ask him to stay away from me. I feel this will be beneficial to all, and will assist the peace and harmony of the project. I point out that I am more than happy to extend the same courtesy to him. That's all. Please do not misconstrue. I wish it to be very clear exactly what I mean. Giacomo 11:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think you make yourself rather clear here. By attack I mean come to TreasuryTag's page with the intent of making his editing of Misplaced Pages unpleasant (in violation of WP:HARASS). Threatening to do this is also a violation of harass, FYI - Kingpin (talk) 11:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have no intention at all of attacking Treasure Tag - I merely ask him to stay away from me. I feel this will be beneficial to all, and will assist the peace and harmony of the project. I point out that I am more than happy to extend the same courtesy to him. That's all. Please do not misconstrue. I wish it to be very clear exactly what I mean. Giacomo 11:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)