| Revision as of 14:57, 4 November 2010 editTHF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,107 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson. using TW | Revision as of 14:58, 4 November 2010 edit undoTHF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,107 edits →Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson: WP:FORKNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}}.html|2=Afd statistics}} | :{{la|Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}}.html|2=Afd statistics}} | ||
| :({{Find sources|Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}}) | :({{Find sources|Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson}}) | ||
| District-court cases do not merit their own articles under ]. As LEW says, it is that the statute of limitations runs from the date of publication. (COI disclaimer: I am in this case. Also, I have been sued (along with twelve other parties) a under an accusation that I have "incited" others to defame Wolk whenever someone writes about this lawsuit. And I don't want to be accused of inciting if someone writes something in Misplaced Pages that Wolk doesn't like, so I hereby announce that my position is that no one should ever write anything about ] on Misplaced Pages ever unless they have Arthur Wolk's permission.) ] (]) 14:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ]. District-court cases do not merit their own articles under ]. As LEW says, it is that the statute of limitations runs from the date of publication. (COI disclaimer: I am in this case. Also, I have been sued (along with twelve other parties) a under an accusation that I have "incited" others to defame Wolk whenever someone writes about this lawsuit. And I don't want to be accused of inciting if someone writes something in Misplaced Pages that Wolk doesn't like, so I hereby announce that my position is that no one should ever write anything about ] on Misplaced Pages ever unless they have Arthur Wolk's permission.) ] (]) 14:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 4 November 2010
Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson
- Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:FORK. District-court cases do not merit their own articles under WP:N. As LEW says, it is well-settled law that the statute of limitations runs from the date of publication. (COI disclaimer: I am a defendant in this case. Also, I have been sued (along with twelve other parties) a second time under an accusation that I have "incited" others to defame Wolk whenever someone writes about this lawsuit. And I don't want to be accused of inciting if someone writes something in Misplaced Pages that Wolk doesn't like, so I hereby announce that my position is that no one should ever write anything about Arthur Alan Wolk on Misplaced Pages ever unless they have Arthur Wolk's permission.) THF (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories: