| Revision as of 08:52, 15 November 2010 editGoodvac (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,892 edits →:(: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:22, 15 November 2010 edit undo89.211.65.21 (talk) →'Commie'...!: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| if my article is deleted, can you give me some tips to prevent this in the future? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | if my article is deleted, can you give me some tips to prevent this in the future? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :I'm sorry that the article being discussed at ] will likely be deleted; I can see how much effort you've expended to put it together. To prevent deletion of an article you create, make sure that significant sources exist (to meet ]) and that the subject is ] by Misplaced Pages standards. See ] for a guide. ] (]) 08:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | :I'm sorry that the article being discussed at ] will likely be deleted; I can see how much effort you've expended to put it together. To prevent deletion of an article you create, make sure that significant sources exist (to meet ]) and that the subject is ] by Misplaced Pages standards. See ] for a guide. ] (]) 08:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == 'Commie'...! == | |||
| Your suggestion for a cite was welcomed and I thought we were trying for consensus but Beyond My Ken has unilaterally decided that this cite will suffice and used it to reinstate 'RC Pool'. It's wholly indicative of personal whims and stalkery getting in the way of accuracy. I just don;t see my edits here as disruptive - challenging inaccuracy and reverting what has now become vandalism. Worryingly, other editors seems happy to pick up the baton of inaccuracy, including one that reverted me so I 'wouldn't get away with it' (er.. having it correct?). That's got to be concerning as an edit summary and modus operandi? --] (]) 10:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:22, 15 November 2010
| User | 
|
Talk | 
|
Contribs | 
|
Sandbox | 
|
Tools | 
|
Icons | 
|
Thursday 9 January 22:47 UTC Welcome to Goodvac's talk page
- If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page.
- If I've left you a message on your talk page, I'll watch it, so please reply there.
- Please sign your comments by inserting four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Leave me a message
The Harvard Crimson
The information is well known to all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.219.239.238 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 12 November 2010
- Then you would be able to provide a source that substantiates those claims. Goodvac (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
You got ...
... that one right. Antandrus (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've been keeping an eye on that thread since it opened. At first, as an observer, I assumed good faith, but as the baseless accusations persisted, good faith exhausted. A block was not unforeseeable. Goodvac (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the heads up. Looooooooooooong day. :)--intelati 07:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. I was just looking around and saw something on which I could shed some light. Goodvac (talk) 07:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Re. ANI for PsychClone
Actually she has a point - but to get it one must return this toxic half-screen banner. Perched atop an AFD or RFCU the banner, indeed, looks like the kitty menace. Sometimes only socks pronounce the obvious.
Cheers, East of Borschov 10:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- With no doubt, PsychClone has some valid points, but the circumstances in which the comments were expressed lead me to believe the user is a sock solely here to disrupt. Goodvac (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Expedrium
Hello Goodvac, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Expedrium, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- G11 was not the only reason I had. See this; it was also a copyvio of http://www.elance.com/s/expedrium/. Goodvac (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
:(
- (
if my article is deleted, can you give me some tips to prevent this in the future? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessicagilmore (talk • contribs) 08:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that the article being discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Matthew edward hall will likely be deleted; I can see how much effort you've expended to put it together. To prevent deletion of an article you create, make sure that significant sources exist (to meet WP:GNG) and that the subject is notable by Misplaced Pages standards. See Misplaced Pages:Your first article for a guide. Goodvac (talk) 08:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
'Commie'...!
Your suggestion for a cite was welcomed and I thought we were trying for consensus but Beyond My Ken has unilaterally decided that this cite will suffice and used it to reinstate 'RC Pool'. It's wholly indicative of personal whims and stalkery getting in the way of accuracy. I just don;t see my edits here as disruptive - challenging inaccuracy and reverting what has now become vandalism. Worryingly, other editors seems happy to pick up the baton of inaccuracy, including one that reverted me so I 'wouldn't get away with it' (er.. having it correct?). That's got to be concerning as an edit summary and modus operandi? --89.211.65.21 (talk) 10:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)