Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:48, 20 February 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Chinese on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Kusma (討論) 03:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop distorting information about Taiwanese opinion towards Chinese reunification. How "Chinese" Taiwan is is a delicate topic, and we are trying to apprach it with a neutral point of view. Also, your edits on Chinese can be understood as vandalism, so please stop. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 04:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove large chunks of text without explanation, in the edit summary and on the relevant talk page. Otherwise, your edits are automatically reverted as they are construed as vandalism, which can easily get you blocked.--Jiang 06:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I do not endorse the views presented by the man depicted on my user and talk pages. The NPOV rule only applies to articles, not user pages.--Jiang 07:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

(I was too slow in typing this, so my answer comes a bit late) I can understand your edits on Taiwan independence and am also not completely happy with the sentence you removed that basically said Powell was right and all Taiwanese parties miss the point, but I can also see why Jiang reverted them since you didn't really say why you removed them. It might be a good idea to discuss this issue on Talk:Taiwan independence. However, you should restore the image on Jiang's user page - it is not very polite to edit other people's userpages, and he is only displaying a well-known San Francisco Chinatown figure whose ultra-nationalism is so silly it is almost funny. You should assume good faith and not believe that these are Jiang's personal opinions. By the way, Jiang is an administrator and I am not. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 07:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't know about the factual accuracy of the section that you keep deleting (I am not an expert in international law; it would be a good thing to try to find verifiable sources on this matter). However, there are other ways to remove bias than outright deletion (I have just tried to remove bias by simply changing "unfortunately" to "however"). The article in general seems to be more or less balanced to me, giving all different views on the matter without favoring one over the other (that is what or neutral point of view policy is about). Kusma (討論) 14:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Administrators are human; we are bound to be biased in something in all our lives. The question is whether if our actions as editors and as administrators cause Misplaced Pages to be biased. I don't see any evidence that Jiang has done that. For example, I state on my own user page that I am against George W. Bush, but I don't think I've made any edits that caused Misplaced Pages to slant against Bush. --Nlu (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Jiang's Talk Page

I looked at Jiang's talk page as you asked of JzG. What exactly concerns you about it? Mike _{(T C)} 03:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ so I know who wrote it. How exactly is it racist? Mike _{(T C)} 03:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The picture is protesting an issue, I am unsure what issue. How is it different from shame italy and europe, and shame=jiang that are found on your pages? Mike _{(T C)} 07:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Taiwanese American

You edited somebody else's comment, totally reversing its meaning. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Kusma (討論) 03:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Jiang

You probably know this already by now, but this kind of thing gets fastest replies if posted to the admin incidents board. Also, you need to sign comments with ~~~~. I'm guessing someone is already on the case, but I am going to have a look - I'm also removing the comment at the head of your talk page as being distinctly unhelpful. Just zis  Guy, you know? / 10:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Warning

You are not permitted to edit my user or user talk pages (except to post a comment in the appropriate format, not to delete anything). If you do so once more, you will be blocked. --Jiang 09:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Enough is enough. For your personal attacks and apparently unwillingness to learn Misplaced Pages regulations and follow them, you've been blocked from editing for 24 hours (which does not affect your ability to read Misplaced Pages). If you are willing to contribute positively, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Your prior edit on February 14 () clearly constituted personal attack (particularly in conjunction with the edit summary). That's why I blocked you. --Nlu (talk) 06:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. I don't want to reblock you, but I will if this continues. --Nlu (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

leavin wikipedia

i'm outta wikipedia. dis place is sad. nothin can be done and accomplished and da adminz themselves are biased so anyway i'm out. Peace