Misplaced Pages

User talk:Trelane: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:41, 9 January 2011 editLihaas (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,615 edits →List of terrorist incidents, 2011← Previous edit Revision as of 07:30, 9 January 2011 edit undoTrelane (talk | contribs)167 edits →List of terrorist incidents, 2011: reply to LihaasNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
:::have you tried the other avenues as hes clearly beign disruptive by "stamping his feet" and not attempting to discuss anything! :::have you tried the other avenues as hes clearly beign disruptive by "stamping his feet" and not attempting to discuss anything!
:::RFCC has a case: "Before requesting community comment, at least ''two'' editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and ''tried but failed'' to resolve the problem. " (emphasis added), weve told him to discuss the ''issue'' he keeps resorting to the same diktats.(] (]) 02:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)). :::RFCC has a case: "Before requesting community comment, at least ''two'' editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and ''tried but failed'' to resolve the problem. " (emphasis added), weve told him to discuss the ''issue'' he keeps resorting to the same diktats.(] (]) 02:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).
::::Right now I'm working from a ] basis. Based on the false Consensus that terror "must be called such by a reliable source", I have listed the Wikileaks Diplomatic cable leaks, which were termed terror by both previous United States VP candidates, including the sitting VP Joe Biden. It has also been called terror by the current Majority Leader of the ]. This, and that both were carred by ] and other wire services are MORE than sufficient to qualify this horrible attack (what?) as terror under O Fenian's consensus. For what it's worth, I'm disturbed that this works to reduce the quality of articles on Misplaced Pages, but I note here that this is no more true than the unacceptable standard applied currently to what is/isn't terror. ] (]) 07:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:30, 9 January 2011

Welcome

Hello, Trelane, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Misplaced Pages Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

January 2010

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of terrorist incidents, 2011, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll see you before the arbcom before I allow you to continue to degrade articles on Misplaced Pages. Trelane (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case, there is the link. Please do it right now. O Fenian (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

List of terrorist incidents, 2011

No probs ;) Its happened before. he thinks he owns every terrorism article (particularly where the IRA are concerned) and can scare people off with his bullying.(Lihaas (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)).

He is again hijacking the page to stop discussion. what is the next avenue of DR? if you start it ill support you. as can be seen the reverters have not attempted to discuss the issue onthe talk page.
See: WP:RFCCLihaas (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
update: ive tried RFC. Talk:List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2011#CriteriaLihaas (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
have you tried the other avenues as hes clearly beign disruptive by "stamping his feet" and not attempting to discuss anything!
RFCC has a case: "Before requesting community comment, at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem. " (emphasis added), weve told him to discuss the issue he keeps resorting to the same diktats.(Lihaas (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).
Right now I'm working from a Reductio_ad_absurdum basis. Based on the false Consensus that terror "must be called such by a reliable source", I have listed the Wikileaks Diplomatic cable leaks, which were termed terror by both previous United States VP candidates, including the sitting VP Joe Biden. It has also been called terror by the current Majority Leader of the House Homeland Security Committee. This, and that both were carred by afp and other wire services are MORE than sufficient to qualify this horrible attack (what?) as terror under O Fenian's consensus. For what it's worth, I'm disturbed that this works to reduce the quality of articles on Misplaced Pages, but I note here that this is no more true than the unacceptable standard applied currently to what is/isn't terror. Trelane (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)