Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mastiffkennel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:57, 30 November 2010 editThe Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators55,812 edits →WP:RSN: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:14, 23 January 2011 edit undoFluffernutter (talk | contribs)Administrators41,664 edits →Edit warring on St. Bernard (dog): new sectionNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:


Per the comments on the ], I've started a thread at the Reliable Sources noticeboard at ]. I thought the thread might interest you. ] (]) 21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Per the comments on the ], I've started a thread at the Reliable Sources noticeboard at ]. I thought the thread might interest you. ] (]) 21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

== Edit warring on ] ==

I am posting this same warning to both ] and ]. You both appear to be engaged in a slow-motion edit war about what constitutes reliable sourcing. I note that you took this to ] once, but the issue appears to have flared up again and you're both handling it by reverting each other. Please remember that our ] cover even slow edit wars; just because you are not reverting multiple times within a single day does not mean that you're not edit warring and doesn't mean that you are not subject to sanctions for edit warring. If you feel the two of you cannot resolve the issue of what, if anything, constitutes a reliable source for the statements in question, you ''must'' take it either disengage, take it back to the RS noticeboard, or go through our ]. Handling it by sniping and reverting each other is just a quick route to a block. ] (]) 22:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:14, 23 January 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages

Welcome!

Hello, Mastiffkennel, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PhilKnight (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

English Mastiff

Hi,

I left a response on my talk page and a comment on the English Mastiff discussion page.

Best of luck, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:RSN

Per the comments on the Talk:St. Bernard (dog), I've started a thread at the Reliable Sources noticeboard at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#St. Bernard (dog). I thought the thread might interest you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring on St. Bernard (dog)

I am posting this same warning to both User talk:Mastiffkennel and User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights. You both appear to be engaged in a slow-motion edit war about what constitutes reliable sourcing. I note that you took this to WP:RSN once, but the issue appears to have flared up again and you're both handling it by reverting each other. Please remember that our edit-war prohibitions cover even slow edit wars; just because you are not reverting multiple times within a single day does not mean that you're not edit warring and doesn't mean that you are not subject to sanctions for edit warring. If you feel the two of you cannot resolve the issue of what, if anything, constitutes a reliable source for the statements in question, you must take it either disengage, take it back to the RS noticeboard, or go through our dispute resolution process. Handling it by sniping and reverting each other is just a quick route to a block. Fluffernutter, previously known as Chaoticfluffy (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)