Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ehsan1388: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:19, 12 February 2011 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,217 edits Warning: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 13:36, 12 February 2011 edit undoEhsan1388 (talk | contribs)171 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


:: Please calm down. Blustering is unhelpful. I tagged the image because the source website was down when I tried to check it. It was briefly back up again some time ago and I checked. I could find the source page of the image, but I could not find the phrase you cite anywhere on that site. If I overlooked it, please point me to the precise page where it says that. All I saw (on the English pages) was a normal copyright notice, i.e. all rights reserved. Without a better translation I'm also not sure it would actually constitute a free license, even if it does say it somewhere. It's inherently unlikely. That site is a commercial news agency. They presumably try to make money selling these images. It would be rather self-defeating if they gave them all away for free, don't you think? ] ] 11:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC) :: Please calm down. Blustering is unhelpful. I tagged the image because the source website was down when I tried to check it. It was briefly back up again some time ago and I checked. I could find the source page of the image, but I could not find the phrase you cite anywhere on that site. If I overlooked it, please point me to the precise page where it says that. All I saw (on the English pages) was a normal copyright notice, i.e. all rights reserved. Without a better translation I'm also not sure it would actually constitute a free license, even if it does say it somewhere. It's inherently unlikely. That site is a commercial news agency. They presumably try to make money selling these images. It would be rather self-defeating if they gave them all away for free, don't you think? ] ] 11:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Dear Sir.I guess you do not have the right to delete an image immediately if you are unsure of its copyright state.I have provided all information regarding that picture but unfortunately you continued to do your personalized decision.I filed a complain against your act to Wikimedia foundation and also one of the administrators through my representative.Act of people like you discourage users from contributions.Also if you can not read Persian you should ask some who can to not to accuse a user of lying.
And I have no idea about your country but in mines images that are published to the public through official or semi official agencies are free for everyone to use some by noting the copyright and some even without it.


== Warning == == Warning ==


By the way, I take it that you are also the IP editor {{ipuser|80.191.64.2}}. In that case, let me strongly warn you against repeating anything like . ] ] 11:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC) By the way, I take it that you are also the IP editor {{ipuser|80.191.64.2}}. In that case, let me strongly warn you against repeating anything like . ] ] 11:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
::Again ,Accusing me of vandalism.I also took this into consideration in my email.I am not interested to politics .take a look at my contribution first and take some network courses to know that Many of IPs are shared zillion times a day.

A copy of this conversation has been attached to the email.

I do not want to start a war but this is my right.

Revision as of 13:36, 12 February 2011

Images

It is ok and it should be deleted.I try to find a picture from my own collection.Thank you. 11:11, 16 January 2011 (IST)

I think the deletion is not proper. According to Iranian law media content produced by publicly funded organizations such as IRIN can be used without any copy rights as long as they are identified as such. It is very similar to any kind of media produced by government of US, which are extensively being used on wikipedia.--Irooniqermez (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a lawyer, but looking at this category I don't see a template for PD Iran other than the usual expiration one, which makes me doubtful. Also, I haven't read through the entire law, can you point me to the exact section? --Muhandes (talk) 11:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kish Air Show 2009.jpg

Delete this please!

Orphaned non-free image File:Iran space agency ofiicial logo.jpg

Delete this please!

File permission problem with File:Iran Space Lab.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Iran Space Lab.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 09:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE NOTE EVERYBODY READING THIS:

All images from Mehrnews agency can be published to the public as far as you note the copyright and the name "Mehrnews Agency" .This has been clearly stated in their photo section of their website at the button of all pictures which says in Persian امانت داری و اخلاق مداری استفاده از این عکس(ها) فقط با ذکر منبع "خبرگزاری مهر" مجاز است. If you can not read Persian and do not know how to use Google translator then this is your problem. Deleting this picture which has all kinds of copyright, source and... is not acceptable and doing so I will officially complain to Wikimedia Headquarter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehsan1388 (talkcontribs)

Please calm down. Blustering is unhelpful. I tagged the image because the source website was down when I tried to check it. It was briefly back up again some time ago and I checked. I could find the source page of the image, but I could not find the phrase you cite anywhere on that site. If I overlooked it, please point me to the precise page where it says that. All I saw (on the English pages) was a normal copyright notice, i.e. all rights reserved. Without a better translation I'm also not sure it would actually constitute a free license, even if it does say it somewhere. It's inherently unlikely. That site is a commercial news agency. They presumably try to make money selling these images. It would be rather self-defeating if they gave them all away for free, don't you think? Fut.Perf. 11:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Dear Sir.I guess you do not have the right to delete an image immediately if you are unsure of its copyright state.I have provided all information regarding that picture but unfortunately you continued to do your personalized decision.I filed a complain against your act to Wikimedia foundation and also one of the administrators through my representative.Act of people like you discourage users from contributions.Also if you can not read Persian you should ask some who can to not to accuse a user of lying.

And I have no idea about your country but in mines images that are published to the public through official or semi official agencies are free for everyone to use some by noting the copyright and some even without it.

Warning

By the way, I take it that you are also the IP editor 80.191.64.2 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). In that case, let me strongly warn you against repeating anything like this. Fut.Perf. 11:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Again ,Accusing me of vandalism.I also took this into consideration in my email.I am not interested to politics .take a look at my contribution first and take some network courses to know that Many of IPs are shared zillion times a day.

A copy of this conversation has been attached to the email.

I do not want to start a war but this is my right.

User talk:Ehsan1388: Difference between revisions Add topic