| Revision as of 02:57, 15 February 2011 editEdison (talk | contribs)Administrators53,898 edits →Serene Branson← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:00, 15 February 2011 edit undoTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Serene Branson: - fraudulentNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| *:None of that confers notability, just standard blurbs on a minor reporter. Oh, she left one job for another? Woo hoo....local, trivial coverage. Stop trying to squeeze notability out of nothing. ] (]) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | *:None of that confers notability, just standard blurbs on a minor reporter. Oh, she left one job for another? Woo hoo....local, trivial coverage. Stop trying to squeeze notability out of nothing. ] (]) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ** ] requires only multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, which is satisfied. An entire article is not trivial coverage.] (]) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ** ] requires only multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, which is satisfied. An entire article is not trivial coverage.] (]) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ***Your claim is simply fraudulent. What we have are two small articles from the same local (sacbee.com) source. That does not even remotely satisfy "multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources". ] (]) 03:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per ]. --] ] 02:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. --] ] 02:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| **As shown above, she had multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources before the recent worldwide news coverage. ] (]) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | **As shown above, she had multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources before the recent worldwide news coverage. ] (]) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ***As shown above, this claim is rebutted. Easily. ] (]) 03:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - This is going to be the new task I appoint myself; every time I see some witless, TMZ-ish OHMYGOD news-of-the-day about some previously unknown person suddenly getting drive-byed by the 24/7 news media, I will come here. I will then search for this person, crossing my fingers and hoping against hope that it will be a redlink. Today, disappointment sets in. She is being mentioned only for this ], an on-air screw-up or seizure or whatever they think it is, it will be in youtube's archives forever more and that will be the end of it. A smattering of local dribble trawled out of a google search does not rescue this person form obscurity; absent this event, we would not be talking about her all. There are thousands of reporters in thousands of communities who have no doubt received the same "Person X is leaving local outlet Y to take a job at local outlet Z" write-ups. ] (]) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - This is going to be the new task I appoint myself; every time I see some witless, TMZ-ish OHMYGOD news-of-the-day about some previously unknown person suddenly getting drive-byed by the 24/7 news media, I will come here. I will then search for this person, crossing my fingers and hoping against hope that it will be a redlink. Today, disappointment sets in. She is being mentioned only for this ], an on-air screw-up or seizure or whatever they think it is, it will be in youtube's archives forever more and that will be the end of it. A smattering of local dribble trawled out of a google search does not rescue this person form obscurity; absent this event, we would not be talking about her all. There are thousands of reporters in thousands of communities who have no doubt received the same "Person X is leaving local outlet Y to take a job at local outlet Z" write-ups. ] (]) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 15 February 2011
Serene Branson
- Serene Branson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was hastily added after incorrect reporting of an on air incident. Proposing for deletion as a non notable reporter. Safiel (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Also, the Frank Shakespeare award she won is in itself non notable and not sufficient to establish her notability. Safiel (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This is a just a local reporting flubbing about 10 seconds of speech, which is pretty minor. --Rob (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete – A minor case of Paraphasia. ttonyb (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Weak delete. She may well be non-notable under the applicable Misplaced Pages standards, but in fairness, it should be noted that last night's incident has been reported in hundreds of reliable sources, nationally and internationally, in addition to hundreds of unsavory gossip sites. She has been around as a reporter for quite a while and might have a scintilla of notability apart from last night's scare. However, I haven't been able to track down independent confirmation of the Emmy nominations mentioned at her station bio, and it appears to me that the "Frank Shakespeare Award" mentioned there is a student award given by the Institute on Political Journalism of the Fund for American Studies, and thus probably not anything that conveys notability. WP:BLP1E and some level of discretion here may suggest that deletion is the best course.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Even if we get 3rd party verification of the emmy nom, it probably wouldn't show notability, since it's probably a regional emmy, given for local news coverage. --Rob (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Do not delete There is no basis for deleting this article. Case in point: Caitlin Upton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.102.220.252 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- KEEP Don't you just love the way that Safiel determines that this beautiful reporter's prize is "not notable". And what have you won, Safiel? What national prizes have you won, you lazy armchair prat? This is a classic example of the talentless morons who dictate their biased and unfair views on Misplaced Pages. If you weren't posting on Misplaced Pages and if the internet didn't exist, you would never even have a platform to voice your worthless rubbish. No one would listen to your rubbish; just another smelly college student getting ready to join a workforce of sheep. Serene Branson is a beautiful young lady who has achieved a wonderful prize and deserves to be recognized for that honor. She also has a wonderful career in front of her, despite you nasty talentless male pigs wishing her ill. FACT: None of YOU could win the Frank Shakespeare award. Deleting her article is totally against the spirit of Misplaced Pages that Jimbo Wales professes to encourage while asking the public with his begging bowl to donate money. Please do NOT delete this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairnessprevails (talk • contribs) 01:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Comment – Fairnessprevails, It does not matter that you are new to Misplaced Pages, such comments are not only not appreciated, but they are not acceptable in any form. If you wish to contribute to Misplaced Pages, I suggest you realize this is a community of volunteers and understand you are welcome to disagree, but not become disagreeable. Please read WP:UNCIVIL before you continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. I will make sure you have been left a Welcome message on your talk page that contains a number of useful links. ttonyb (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment ttonyb your play on words, witty as it may be, does not help your case. Fairnessprevails is entitled defend his/her standpoint in this matter. If you find this disagreeable then I recommend you disregard Fairnessprevails comment. Others may find it completely valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.102.220.252 (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment – My comments were not intended to defend my stand on the article, only to point out to Fairnessprevails lack of civility is not appreciated nor acceptable on Misplaced Pages. If you think it is, then I suggest you also read WP:UNCIVIL. Fairnessprevails is more than entitled to defend his/her stand; however, not in a manner that is offensive or WP:UNCIVIL. ttonyb (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep She had some claim of notability before the vocal flubadub, since there had been multiple news coverage about her, not merely by her. See the pre-flub Google News Archive results for 2005-2010:. See in particular a 2007 newspaper article about her, "Serene Branson who had been freelancing in the area will be a reporter ..." and "Serene Branson Channel 13's crime reporter made a name for herself during last November's sweeps when she had an exclusive interview with released pedophile ... " , behind paywall, also appear to have significant coverage of her before the episode. Being in the news worldwide does not remove modest notability which previously existed. Edison (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- None of that confers notability, just standard blurbs on a minor reporter. Oh, she left one job for another? Woo hoo....local, trivial coverage. Stop trying to squeeze notability out of nothing. Tarc (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- WP:N requires only multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, which is satisfied. An entire article is not trivial coverage.Edison (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Your claim is simply fraudulent. What we have are two small articles from the same local (sacbee.com) source. That does not even remotely satisfy "multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources". Tarc (talk) 03:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per our policy on biographies of living people who are known only for a single event. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- As shown above, she had multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources before the recent worldwide news coverage. Edison (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- As shown above, this claim is rebutted. Easily. Tarc (talk) 03:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- As shown above, she had multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources before the recent worldwide news coverage. Edison (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - This is going to be the new task I appoint myself; every time I see some witless, TMZ-ish OHMYGOD news-of-the-day about some previously unknown person suddenly getting drive-byed by the 24/7 news media, I will come here. I will then search for this person, crossing my fingers and hoping against hope that it will be a redlink. Today, disappointment sets in. She is being mentioned only for this WP:ONEEVENT, an on-air screw-up or seizure or whatever they think it is, it will be in youtube's archives forever more and that will be the end of it. A smattering of local dribble trawled out of a google search does not rescue this person form obscurity; absent this event, we would not be talking about her all. There are thousands of reporters in thousands of communities who have no doubt received the same "Person X is leaving local outlet Y to take a job at local outlet Z" write-ups. Tarc (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)