Revision as of 09:55, 5 December 2008 editDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:02, 26 February 2011 edit undoCromium (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,167 edits −Category:2007 books; −Category:History books using HotCat | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] {{R to list entry}} | |||
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War|date=26 November 2008|result='''no consensus'''}} --> | <!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War|date=26 November 2008|result='''no consensus'''}} --> | ||
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> | <!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> | ||
{{notability}} | |||
{{Merge|Osprey_Publishing#General_Military|date=November 2008}} | |||
{{Infobox Book | | |||
| name = Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War | |||
| image = ] | |||
| image _caption = Book cover | |||
| author = ] | |||
| cover_artist = | |||
| country = ] | |||
| language = ] | |||
| genre = ] | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| release_date = April 24, 2007 | |||
| media_type = Print (]) | |||
| pages = 320 | |||
| isbn = 1846031087 | |||
}} | |||
'''''Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War''''' is a 2007 book of the | |||
] ''General Military'' series, dealing with the ], written by ]. It covers the history of early ] as well as that of ] from the ] until the ]. ''Shadows in the Desert'' is his second publication with Osprey, after ''Sassanian Elite Cavalry AD 224-642'' (2005). | |||
==Contents== | |||
''Shadows in the Desert'' covers the three major empires of ] (], ], ]). It tabulates a range of aspects of the pre-Islamic Iranian Culture, in the fields of ]s, and ], ], ], ], religion (] and ]), warfare (] and the associated Pahlavi culture of ]), ]s, ] and ].{{Dubious|date=November 2008}} | |||
The author mentions the weaknesses of Persia before the arrival of Islam. Mention is made for example, of the inequitable distribution of wealth seen between the nobility and the ] on the one hand versus the peasant and ordinary populations on the other – and the historical consequences of these social dynamics. | |||
Farrokh makes reference to the research of ] artist ], whose works had remained largely confined to Italian scholarship. Spatari has tabulated the impact of the architecture of pre-Islamic Persia upon ] and ]. Farrokh has cited Spatari’s findings for the first time in English-language publications. | |||
===Structure=== | |||
''Shadows in the Desert: Persia at War'' is divided into three parts, each of which contain several sections. | |||
*Foreword: The Mighty Persian Warriors ''by ]'' | |||
*Introduction: Persia or Iran? | |||
*Chronology | |||
*Part 1: The ] | |||
**1 Before the Achaemenids | |||
**2 Cyrus the Great and the early Achaemenids | |||
**3 Darius the Great | |||
**4 Xerxes and Limits of Empire | |||
**5 The Achaemenid Empire from Artaxerxes I to the rise of Macedon | |||
**6 Darius III and the fall of the Empire | |||
*Part 2: The ]ns | |||
**7 The Seleucids and the rise of the Parthians | |||
**8 Parthia challenges Rome | |||
**9 Parthia from Mark Antony to the Alan invasions | |||
**10 Emperor Trajan's bid to destroy Parthia | |||
**11 The decline and fall of Parthia | |||
*Part 3: The ] | |||
**12 The rise of the Sassanian Dynasty | |||
**13 Shapur II: a new revival of Sassanian Persia | |||
**14 The tumultuous Fifth Century | |||
**15 The Kavad era | |||
**16 Khosrow I, renaissance and revival | |||
**17 The final glory and the decline of the Empire | |||
**18 Downfall of the Sassanians and the Islamic conquests | |||
**19 The legacy of Persia after the Islamic conquests | |||
*Endnotes | |||
*Select bibliography | |||
*Index | |||
===Prehistory=== | |||
Farrokh also extends his discussion to his views on the ] and their "relationship to the ]" in upper ]. For this purpose, Farrokh conflates the ] of ] with the ] of ] and ], besides discussing the ] in the ]. | |||
==="The Alexander Mystique"=== | |||
"The Alexander Mystique", which is presented in the final chapter of the book, is the notion that the Iranians were permanently defeated and superseded by the Greeks, ] in particular, and the Romans. This has led, he suggests, to the ignorance in much of western academia as to how and why the post-Alexandrian ] were overthrown by the second empire of Persia, the Parthians. Even less acknowledged he believes, as a consequence of the Alexander Mystique, are the military defeats suffered by Roman armies under the leadership of historical figures such as ], ], ], and ].<ref> </ref> | |||
==Reception== | |||
Reactions to the book have been mixed. Jona Lendering in ''Bryn Mawr Classical Review'' was strongly negative, arguing that it was an "exceptionally bad book".<ref name="Lendering2008">{{cite journal | last = Lendering | first = Jona | year = 2008 | title = Kaveh Farrokh, Shadows in the Desert. Ancient Persia at War. | journal = Bryn Mawr Classical Review | volume = 62 | issue = 9 | url = http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2008/2008-09-62.html | accessdate = December 2, 2008 }}</ref> While acknowledging that the book was attractive in its presentation, (a view mirrored by Fred Rhodes in ''Middle East''),<ref name="Rhodes2007">{{cite journal | last = Rhodes | first = Fred | date = May 2007 | title = Shadows in the Desert Ancient Persia at War | journal = Middle East | issue = 378 | pages = pp. 65–67 }}</ref> the reviewer was critical of the coverage – both in terms of what was (and was not) included in the work and the author's approach to the sources.<ref name="Lendering2008" /> Nevertheless, other reviewers had a different response. Rhodes, in his short review, wrote that it offered a "comprehensive history of Persia's wars",<ref name="Rhodes2007" /> while Higham, writing in ''Current Reviews for Academic Libraries'', argued that it provided balance to the stories about Persia written by "Greek and Roman observers and historians".<ref name="Higham">{{cite journal | last = Higham | first = R. | date = February 2008 | title = Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War | journal = Current Reviews for Academic Libraries | volume = 45 | issue = 6 | pages = 1034–1034 }}</ref> In addition, an anonymous "collective of graduate students, researchers, scholars and writers of Iranica" wrote a reply to Lendering's review, in which they responded to the criticisms leveled by Lendering.<ref name="Rozaneh">{{cite web | date = Fall, 2008 | title = Let’s Abandon the Distortions of Achaemenid Studies | work = Rozaneh | url = http://www.rozanehmagazine.com/Rozanehweb/DRKFINDEX.html | accessdate = December 2, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
The book was recommended to the ''World Affairs International Society of Stanford University'' by one Robert Gibbs.<ref>[http://cgi.stanford.edu/group/wais/cgi-bin/?p=11367 "Introducing 'Shadows in the Desert'" by Robert Gibbs</ref> | |||
The "about this book" section on its ] profile quotes sympathetic comments by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones of the Department of Classics at the ] and by ] of the Department of Classics at ].<ref name="link1"></ref> | |||
The forward was written by ]<ref>Farrokh, Kaveh. ''Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War''. Osprey Publishing, 2007. Foreword page 7</ref>. Richard Frye notes:"In this book Dr. Farrokh has given us the Persian side of the picture as opposed to the Greek side and Roman viewpoint which has long dominated our understanding of these wars. It is refreshing to see other perspectives, and Dr. Farrokh sheds light on many Persian institutions in this history, such as the Sassanian elite cavalry, the "saravan". Osprey Publishing is to be congratulated for publishing ''Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War, which presents another aspect of wars between East and West in ancient times". | |||
The book has received the "]" in 2008.<ref> BBC Persian: November 05, 2008. </ref>. | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:02, 26 February 2011
Redirect to:
- To a list entry: This is a redirect to a list in which the subject is an entry.
- For redirects from a topic to a related list and not to an entry on that list, use {{R from list topic}} instead.