Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Dreadstar Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:24, 2 July 2011 editWill Beback (talk | contribs)112,162 edits →Deletion review for Lewinsky (neologism): cmt← Previous edit Revision as of 23:26, 2 July 2011 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits →Deletion review for Lewinsky (neologism): Fuck offNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
*Lurkers attend: . ] <small>]</small> 23:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC) *Lurkers attend: . ] <small>]</small> 23:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
**This is clear canvassing: . Please do not leave non-neutral requests for participation. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 23:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) **This is clear canvassing: . Please do not leave non-neutral requests for participation. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 23:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
***Please read ], that is in '''no way''' canvassing. 23:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:26, 2 July 2011

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Welcome!
   

Archives and sandboxes

In recognition of your efforts on Misplaced Pages and for dedication to law oriented edits, I, Cdogsimmons, award you the Society Barnstar.

Defender

The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
In recognition & thanks for your efforts in helping us work our way towards consensus towards making Battle of Washita River a good WP:NPOV (instead of WP:SOAP) article. Still a lotta work to do, but now we can do it, in no small part because of your help. Yksin

Award!

The Vandal Eliminator Award
* I, Stormtracker94, award you the Vandal Eliminator Award for amazing vandal fighting and RC Patrol. STORMTRACKER 94

RL Barnstar

The Real Life Barnstar
- For reporting a situation that could have resulted in a real life massacre I present you this barnstar. Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! Thank you. +Hexagon1
Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! +Hexagon1
Just be glad you're on the good side, every time I get involved in situations like that, I seem to be the one getting arrested... (kidding, please don't report me Mr. Thoughtpolice-man! :) +Hexagon1

Holy wow. Good job, Dreadstar. --Fang Aili

New comments below this section

Thanks! Dreadstar †

Deletion

Which speedy deletion reason was the basis for your deletion of Lewinsky (neologism)? Your deletion comment was WP:BLP concerns ""Bill Clinton" rather than Lewinsky", but I'm not sure if you're claiming it violated G10. It looks like a well-sourced and neutral article, so I don't think G10 would apply. I suggest you restore it and go through a regular AFD.   Will Beback  talk  22:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

It's clearly a BLP violation; and I will not be restoring it. Dreadstar ☥ 22:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
I also see you blocked the editor who created it. user:Kiwi Bomb. It may well be that they are a sock or have committed other blockable offenses, but I don't see how writing that article qualifies, especially since there was no warning. Who do you think is the sock master?   Will Beback  talk  22:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Again, read WP:BLP. Dreadstar ☥ 22:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Not really relevant.   ]  talk  22:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
I think it it. It's called 'retaliation'. Dreadstar ☥ 22:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Lewinsky (neologism)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lewinsky (neologism). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.   Will Beback  talk  22:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)